跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

verify-citations

Verify citations and references in a document, report, or article against real sources. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify references, che…

执行命令联网无严重或高危命中sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,4 KB
它会碰到什么执行命令联网
命中总数1 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Citation Verification

Verify that citations in a document actually resolve and support the claims they're attached to. Uses the Stipple API (free anonymous tier, no signup) for citation resolution, arithmetic recomputation, and unsupported-claim detection.

When to use

  • Before submitting or publishing a research report, tender response, or whitepaper
  • Reviewing an LLM-generated document (LLM citations are plausibly-formatted and frequently wrong)
  • Due diligence on third-party reports
  • Academic reference checking

Instructions

  1. Get the document. Ask the user for a URL to the report, or a local file path (PDF, DOCX, Markdown). If the user pastes text directly, skip to step 3 with text input.
  1. Run verification. POST the document to Stipple's citation verification endpoint:
   curl -X POST https://www.stipple.sh/v1/verify-references \
     -F "file=@report.pdf" \
     -H "Authorization: Bearer $STIPPLE_API_KEY"

The anonymous free tier works without the Authorization header. Deep mode (?deep=true) costs more credits but cross-checks citations against live web sources.

  1. Interpret the response. The result includes:
  • verification_coverage — percentage of claims verified (e.g. "78%")
  • citations[] — per-citation status: resolved and matching, resolved but mismatched, or unresolvable, with the issue explained
  • arithmetic[] — recomputed figures vs stated figures (flags decimal shifts, wrong sums)
  • unsupported_claims[] — claims with no citation at all
  1. Report honestly. Present results as verification coverage, not a truth verdict:
  • "21/27 citations resolve and match"
  • "[x] FY24+FY25 revenue stated $4.2m, actual $3.7m"
  • "[!] 'industry-leading accuracy' — no source in document"
  • Unverified ≠ false. The goal is telling the user which claims are backed and which aren't.
  1. Offer remediation. For failed citations, suggest: fixing the decimal shift, finding the correct source, or removing the unsupported claim.

Output format

Verification coverage: 78%

Citations: 21/27 resolve and match
  [+] "ABS unemployment 4.1% April 2026" — matches abs.gov.au
  [-] "AI adoption grew 340% in 2025" — source states 34%, decimal shifted

Arithmetic: 12/13 recompute correctly
  [x] FY24 + FY25 revenue — stated $4.2m, actual $3.7m

Unsupported claims: 2
  [!] "industry-leading accuracy" — no source in document

Limitations and Safety

  • Uploading a report or manuscript sends its contents to a hosted third party; deep

mode also retrieves external sources. Obtain approval before transmission, remove

confidential or personal material, and verify current retention and deletion terms.

  • Resolution and textual support do not establish that a source is authoritative or

that a claim is true. Inspect consequential citations in the primary source and

preserve page, edition, date, and access context.

  • Treat unresolved or unsupported claims as review items, not proof of fabrication,

and keep a human reviewer responsible for publication or academic decisions.

Notes

  • Works on PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT. For pasted text, POST JSON: {"text": "..."}
  • Deep verification (deep=true) is slower and costs more credits but resolves citations against live sources
  • Pairs well with verify-document (is the source doc itself authentic?) run first
  • Anonymous free tier: shared weekly allowance. Get a free key at https://www.stipple.sh for your own metering

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 verify-citations 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: