verify-citations
Verify citations and references in a document, report, or article against real sources. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify references, che…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Citation Verification
Verify that citations in a document actually resolve and support the claims they're attached to. Uses the Stipple API (free anonymous tier, no signup) for citation resolution, arithmetic recomputation, and unsupported-claim detection.
When to use
- Before submitting or publishing a research report, tender response, or whitepaper
- Reviewing an LLM-generated document (LLM citations are plausibly-formatted and frequently wrong)
- Due diligence on third-party reports
- Academic reference checking
Instructions
- Get the document. Ask the user for a URL to the report, or a local file path (PDF, DOCX, Markdown). If the user pastes text directly, skip to step 3 with
textinput.
- Run verification. POST the document to Stipple's citation verification endpoint:
curl -X POST https://www.stipple.sh/v1/verify-references \
-F "file=@report.pdf" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STIPPLE_API_KEY"
The anonymous free tier works without the Authorization header. Deep mode (?deep=true) costs more credits but cross-checks citations against live web sources.
- Interpret the response. The result includes:
verification_coverage— percentage of claims verified (e.g. "78%")citations[]— per-citation status: resolved and matching, resolved but mismatched, or unresolvable, with the issue explainedarithmetic[]— recomputed figures vs stated figures (flags decimal shifts, wrong sums)unsupported_claims[]— claims with no citation at all
- Report honestly. Present results as verification coverage, not a truth verdict:
- "21/27 citations resolve and match"
- "[x] FY24+FY25 revenue stated $4.2m, actual $3.7m"
- "[!] 'industry-leading accuracy' — no source in document"
- Unverified ≠ false. The goal is telling the user which claims are backed and which aren't.
- Offer remediation. For failed citations, suggest: fixing the decimal shift, finding the correct source, or removing the unsupported claim.
Output format
Verification coverage: 78%
Citations: 21/27 resolve and match
[+] "ABS unemployment 4.1% April 2026" — matches abs.gov.au
[-] "AI adoption grew 340% in 2025" — source states 34%, decimal shifted
Arithmetic: 12/13 recompute correctly
[x] FY24 + FY25 revenue — stated $4.2m, actual $3.7m
Unsupported claims: 2
[!] "industry-leading accuracy" — no source in document
Limitations and Safety
- Uploading a report or manuscript sends its contents to a hosted third party; deep
mode also retrieves external sources. Obtain approval before transmission, remove
confidential or personal material, and verify current retention and deletion terms.
- Resolution and textual support do not establish that a source is authoritative or
that a claim is true. Inspect consequential citations in the primary source and
preserve page, edition, date, and access context.
- Treat unresolved or unsupported claims as review items, not proof of fabrication,
and keep a human reviewer responsible for publication or academic decisions.
Notes
- Works on PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT. For pasted text, POST JSON:
{"text": "..."} - Deep verification (
deep=true) is slower and costs more credits but resolves citations against live sources - Pairs well with
verify-document(is the source doc itself authentic?) run first - Anonymous free tier: shared weekly allowance. Get a free key at https://www.stipple.sh for your own metering
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/verify-citations/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 verify-citations 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills — Verify citations and references in a document, report, or article against real sources. Us
- sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills — Verify citations and references in a document, report, or article against real sources. Us