what-am-i-not-seeing
Surface the blind spot — the missing stakeholder, the ignored option, the risk outside your frame, the thing you're too close to notice. Use when as…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
What Am I Not Seeing
The most dangerous gaps are the ones outside your frame — you can't see what you're not looking at. This deliberately searches the edges of your thinking: the stakeholder you forgot, the option you unconsciously ruled out, the ripple effect two steps downstream, and the obvious thing you've gone blind to from being too close. It answers a question your own mind structurally can't.
What This Skill Produces
- The missing people — stakeholders, affected parties, or perspectives you haven't accounted for
- The unconsidered options — choices you ruled out without noticing, or never generated
- The second-order effects — the consequences of the consequences, downstream of your plan
- The too-close blind spot — the thing obvious to an outsider that you've stopped seeing
- The uncomfortable angle — the consideration you're subtly avoiding
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The situation or plan — what you're thinking through
- Your current framing — how you're seeing it now (so we can look outside it)
- Who/what you've considered — to find who you haven't
- What's been decided — options already closed off (some may deserve reopening)
Framework: Look Outside The Frame
- Map the current frame. Understand how the person is seeing it — the edges of that frame are where the blind spots live.
- Find the missing actors. Who's affected or involved that isn't in the picture? Absent stakeholders are a classic gap.
- Reopen the ruled-out. What options were dismissed instantly or never generated? Surface at least one worth a second look.
- Trace second-order effects. Follow the consequences one step further than the person has — the ripple, not just the splash.
- Name the too-close miss. What would an outsider immediately notice that familiarity has hidden? And what's the person avoiding looking at?
Output Format
Situation: [what you're thinking through]
Missing people: [stakeholders/perspectives not accounted for].
Unconsidered options: [choices ruled out or never generated].
Second-order effects: [consequences downstream of the obvious].
The too-close blind spot: [what an outsider would notice].
The thing you're avoiding: [the uncomfortable angle].
Most important gap: [the one worth addressing now].
Quality Checks
- [ ] Looks outside the current frame, not confirming it
- [ ] Names specific missing stakeholders/perspectives
- [ ] Reopens at least one unconsidered option
- [ ] Traces genuine second-order effects
- [ ] Surfaces a too-close or avoided blind spot
- [ ] Flags the single most important gap
Anti-Patterns
- Confirming the existing frame instead of expanding it.
- Generic "consider the risks" with nothing specific.
- Only surface-level gaps the person already half-knows.
- No prioritization of which gap matters most.
Example Trigger Phrases
- "What am I missing in this plan?"
- "What's my blind spot on this decision?"
- "Who haven't I considered here?"
- "Is there something about this I'm too close to see?"
- "What haven't I thought about with this move?"
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 what-am-i-not-seeing 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Surface the blind spot — the missing stakeholder, the ignored option, the risk outside you
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Surface the blind spot — the missing stakeholder, the ignored option, the risk outside you