跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

what-am-i-not-seeing

Surface the blind spot — the missing stakeholder, the ignored option, the risk outside your frame, the thing you're too close to notice. Use when as…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,4 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

What Am I Not Seeing

The most dangerous gaps are the ones outside your frame — you can't see what you're not looking at. This deliberately searches the edges of your thinking: the stakeholder you forgot, the option you unconsciously ruled out, the ripple effect two steps downstream, and the obvious thing you've gone blind to from being too close. It answers a question your own mind structurally can't.

What This Skill Produces

  • The missing people — stakeholders, affected parties, or perspectives you haven't accounted for
  • The unconsidered options — choices you ruled out without noticing, or never generated
  • The second-order effects — the consequences of the consequences, downstream of your plan
  • The too-close blind spot — the thing obvious to an outsider that you've stopped seeing
  • The uncomfortable angle — the consideration you're subtly avoiding

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The situation or plan — what you're thinking through
  • Your current framing — how you're seeing it now (so we can look outside it)
  • Who/what you've considered — to find who you haven't
  • What's been decided — options already closed off (some may deserve reopening)

Framework: Look Outside The Frame

  1. Map the current frame. Understand how the person is seeing it — the edges of that frame are where the blind spots live.
  2. Find the missing actors. Who's affected or involved that isn't in the picture? Absent stakeholders are a classic gap.
  3. Reopen the ruled-out. What options were dismissed instantly or never generated? Surface at least one worth a second look.
  4. Trace second-order effects. Follow the consequences one step further than the person has — the ripple, not just the splash.
  5. Name the too-close miss. What would an outsider immediately notice that familiarity has hidden? And what's the person avoiding looking at?

Output Format

Situation: [what you're thinking through]

Missing people: [stakeholders/perspectives not accounted for].

Unconsidered options: [choices ruled out or never generated].

Second-order effects: [consequences downstream of the obvious].

The too-close blind spot: [what an outsider would notice].

The thing you're avoiding: [the uncomfortable angle].

Most important gap: [the one worth addressing now].

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Looks outside the current frame, not confirming it
  • [ ] Names specific missing stakeholders/perspectives
  • [ ] Reopens at least one unconsidered option
  • [ ] Traces genuine second-order effects
  • [ ] Surfaces a too-close or avoided blind spot
  • [ ] Flags the single most important gap

Anti-Patterns

  • Confirming the existing frame instead of expanding it.
  • Generic "consider the risks" with nothing specific.
  • Only surface-level gaps the person already half-knows.
  • No prioritization of which gap matters most.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "What am I missing in this plan?"
  • "What's my blind spot on this decision?"
  • "Who haven't I considered here?"
  • "Is there something about this I'm too close to see?"
  • "What haven't I thought about with this move?"

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 what-am-i-not-seeing 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: