跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

session-guard

>-

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中wshobson/agents

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,4 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Session Guard

Overview

Long sessions corrupt silently. Context compaction drops instructions unannounced. Hooks don't fix it (confirmed by multiple developers on GitHub issues #19471, #9796, #64171). This skill prevents both through behavioral self-enforcement: monitor health, anchor critical rules through compaction, split before damage occurs. No packages, no databases - pure behavioral enforcement that works in every harness.

When to Use

  • Session exceeds 40 tool calls
  • Agent contradicts earlier decisions
  • Style/naming conventions start drifting
  • After any context compaction event
  • Task scope growing unbounded

Health Signals

| Signal | Threshold | Action |

|--------|-----------|--------|

| Tool call count | >40 | YELLOW: checkpoint + recite critical rules |

| Tool call count | >60 | RED: split or compact with anchor |

| Agent contradicts earlier decision | Any | VERIFY: re-read source of truth |

| Style/naming drift | Any | RECITE: state the active rules aloud |

| File read returns unexpected content | Any | RE-READ: don't trust cached state |

| Task scope growing unbounded | Continuous | SPLIT: one task per session |

Protocol

Green Zone (0-40 tool calls)

Normal operation. No intervention needed.

Yellow Zone (40-60 tool calls)

  1. CHECKPOINT - summarize progress in one paragraph
  2. RECITE - state the 3-5 most critical active rules aloud: "Active rules: [naming convention], [file structure], [error handling pattern], [testing requirement]"
  3. ASSESS - almost done? Push through. Not done? Prepare split.
  4. REDUCE - no exploratory reads. Only targeted operations.

Red Zone (60+ tool calls OR drift signal)

  1. STOP - do not make more tool calls
  2. VERIFY - re-read project rules (don't trust memory)
  3. CHECKPOINT - write state to handoff document
  4. SPLIT - create handoff, suggest fresh session

Context Anchoring (anti-compaction)

When compaction has occurred (sudden loss of earlier context, or after /compact):

  1. RE-READ the project's rules file immediately
  2. RECITE the 3-5 critical rules aloud in your response
  3. VERIFY your planned next action matches those rules before executing
  4. If uncertain about ANY prior decision, RE-READ the source file - don't guess

What survives compaction:

  • Most recent user messages (high priority)
  • Currently-invoked skill body (capped at 5K tokens, oldest dropped first)
  • Git status and project structure
  • File contents read AFTER compaction

What gets LOST in compaction:

  • Decisions made early in conversation
  • Architectural rules stated only verbally (not in files)
  • Context from tool outputs (file reads, command outputs)

Compaction-Safe Pattern

Keep critical instructions in FILES (CLAUDE.md, CONTEXT.md), NOT in conversation. If a rule matters, it must live in a file the agent can re-read - not in something agreed on earlier.

Common Mistakes

  • Trusting that you remember the rules after 50+ tool calls (you don't - re-read)
  • Re-reading EVERYTHING to be safe (wastes tool calls - be targeted)
  • Feeling fine therefore assuming context is fine (compaction is SILENT)
  • Splitting AFTER noticing problems (split BEFORE - prevention, not recovery)

Why This Matters

Context compaction is the #1 unsolved platform problem in 2026. Hooks don't fix it (confirmed: the agent ignores post-compaction injections because the compaction summary creates narrative momentum). This skill is the lightweight behavioral countermeasure: no infrastructure, no packages - disciplined self-monitoring that works in every harness.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。