vc-sequential-thinking
Apply step-by-step analysis for complex problems with revision capability. Use for multi-step reasoning, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning,…
它会碰到什么
逐条看命中(2 条严重或高危)
- 严重
README.md:24cred-paths├── .env.example
- 高
scripts/process-thought.js:20cred-envreadconst DISABLE_LOGGING = process.env.DISABLE_THOUGHT_LOGGING?.toLowerCase() === 'true';
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Sequential Thinking
> Output style: Follow process/development-protocols/communication-standards.md — answer-first, plain language, no unexplained jargon, TL;DR on long responses.
Structured problem-solving via manageable, reflective thought sequences with dynamic adjustment.
When to Apply
- Complex problem decomposition
- Adaptive planning with revision capability
- Analysis needing course correction
- Problems with unclear/emerging scope
- Multi-step solutions requiring context maintenance
- Hypothesis-driven investigation/debugging
Core Process
1. Start with Loose Estimate
Thought 1/5: [Initial analysis]
Adjust dynamically as understanding evolves.
2. Structure Each Thought
- Build on previous context explicitly
- Address one aspect per thought
- State assumptions, uncertainties, realizations
- Signal what next thought should address
3. Apply Dynamic Adjustment
- Expand: More complexity discovered → increase total
- Contract: Simpler than expected → decrease total
- Revise: New insight invalidates previous → mark revision
- Branch: Multiple approaches → explore alternatives
4. Use Revision When Needed
Thought 5/8 [REVISION of Thought 2]: [Corrected understanding]
- Original: [What was stated]
- Why revised: [New insight]
- Impact: [What changes]
5. Branch for Alternatives
Thought 4/7 [BRANCH A from Thought 2]: [Approach A]
Thought 4/7 [BRANCH B from Thought 2]: [Approach B]
Compare explicitly, converge with decision rationale.
6. Generate & Verify Hypotheses
Thought 6/9 [HYPOTHESIS]: [Proposed solution]
Thought 7/9 [VERIFICATION]: [Test results]
Iterate until hypothesis verified.
7. Complete Only When Ready
Mark final: Thought N/N [FINAL]
Complete when:
- Solution verified
- All critical aspects addressed
- Confidence achieved
- No outstanding uncertainties
Application Modes
Explicit: Use visible thought markers when complexity warrants visible reasoning or user requests breakdown.
Implicit: Apply methodology internally for routine problem-solving where thinking aids accuracy without cluttering response.
Scripts (Optional)
Optional scripts for deterministic validation/tracking:
scripts/process-thought.js- Validate & track thoughts with historyscripts/format-thought.js- Format for display (box/markdown/simple)
See README.md for usage examples. Use when validation/persistence needed; otherwise apply methodology directly.
References
Load when deeper understanding needed:
references/core-patterns.md- Revision & branching patternsreferences/examples-api.md- API design examplereferences/examples-debug.md- Debugging examplereferences/examples-architecture.md- Architecture decision examplereferences/advanced-techniques.md- Spiral refinement, hypothesis testing, convergencereferences/advanced-strategies.md- Uncertainty, revision cascades, meta-thinking
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
.claude/skills/vc-sequential-thinking/SKILL.md