auto-review-loop-llm
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto …
它会碰到什么
逐条看命中(1 条严重或高危)
- 严重
SKILL.md:4perm-wildcardallowed-tools: Bash(*), Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit, Skill
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Auto Review Loop (Generic LLM): Autonomous Research Improvement
> 🔒 Do not wrap this skill in /loop, /schedule, or CronCreate. Like
> /auto-review-loop, it already loops internally (review → fix → re-review),
> feeding each round's prior-round summary into the next review prompt (the
> backend is a stateless per-round API/MCP call, not a shared thread). An
> external timer re-enters from the top each tick, dropping that accumulated
> context and firing the verdict on wall-clock time instead of on artifact
> change — zero new signal, full token cost. Schedule the *external wait that
> precedes it*, not the verdict. See
> [shared-references/external-cadence.md](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).
Autonomously iterate: review → implement fixes → re-review, until the external reviewer gives a positive assessment or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- MAX_ROUNDS = 4
- POSITIVE_THRESHOLD: score >= 6/10 AND verdict ∈ {"ready", "almost"} — both must hold, matching the operative STOP check below. Verdict vocabulary is {"ready", "almost", "not ready"}. (Earlier wording used
orand a stale verdict set; theANDform is authoritative.) - REVIEW_DOC:
review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md(cumulative log) (fall back to./AUTO_REVIEW.mdfor legacy projects)
LLM Configuration
This skill uses any OpenAI-compatible API for external review via the llm-chat MCP server.
Configuration via MCP Server (Recommended)
Add to ~/.claude/settings.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"llm-chat": {
"command": "/usr/bin/python3",
"args": ["/Users/yourname/.claude/mcp-servers/llm-chat/server.py"],
"env": {
"LLM_API_KEY": "your-api-key",
"LLM_BASE_URL": "https://api.deepseek.com/v1",
"LLM_MODEL": "deepseek-chat"
}
}
}
}
Supported Providers
| Provider | LLM_BASE_URL | LLM_MODEL |
|----------|--------------|-----------|
| OpenAI | https://api.openai.com/v1 | gpt-4o, o3 |
| DeepSeek | https://api.deepseek.com/v1 | deepseek-chat, deepseek-reasoner |
| MiniMax | https://api.minimax.io/v1 | MiniMax-M3 |
| Kimi (Moonshot) | https://api.moonshot.cn/v1 | moonshot-v1-8k, moonshot-v1-32k |
| ZhiPu (GLM) | https://open.bigmodel.cn/api/paas/v4 | glm-4, glm-4-plus |
| SiliconFlow | https://api.siliconflow.cn/v1 | Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct |
| 阿里云百炼 | https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1 | qwen-max |
| 零一万物 | https://api.lingyiwanwu.com/v1 | yi-large |
API Call Method
Primary: MCP Tool
mcp__llm-chat__chat:
prompt: |
[Review prompt content]
model: "deepseek-chat"
system: "You are a senior ML reviewer..."
Fallback: curl
curl -s "${LLM_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${LLM_API_KEY}" \
-d '{
"model": "${LLM_MODEL}",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a senior ML reviewer..."},
{"role": "user", "content": "[review prompt]"}
],
"max_tokens": 4096
}'
State Persistence (Compact Recovery)
Persist state to review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json after each round:
{
"round": 2,
"status": "in_progress",
"last_score": 5.0,
"last_verdict": "not ready",
"pending_experiments": [],
"timestamp": "2026-03-15T10:00:00"
}
Write this file at the end of every Phase E (after documenting the round).
On completion, set "status": "completed".
Workflow
Initialization
- Check
review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.jsonfor recovery (fall back to./REVIEW_STATE.jsonif not found — legacy path) - Read project context and prior reviews
- Initialize round counter
Loop (up to MAX_ROUNDS)
Phase A: Review
If MCP available:
mcp__llm-chat__chat:
system: "You are a senior ML reviewer (NeurIPS/ICML level)."
prompt: |
[Round N/MAX_ROUNDS of autonomous review loop]
[Full research context: claims, methods, results, known weaknesses]
[Changes since last round, if any]
1. Score this work 1-10 for a top venue
2. List remaining critical weaknesses (ranked by severity)
3. For each weakness, specify the MINIMUM fix
4. State clearly: is this READY for submission? Yes/No/Almost
Be brutally honest. If the work is ready, say so clearly.
If MCP NOT available:
curl -s "${LLM_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${LLM_API_KEY}" \
-d '{
"model": "${LLM_MODEL}",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a senior ML reviewer (NeurIPS/ICML level)."},
{"role": "user", "content": "[Full review prompt]"}
],
"max_tokens": 4096
}'
Phase B: Parse Assessment
CRITICAL: Save the FULL raw response verbatim. Then extract:
- Score (numeric 1-10)
- Verdict ("ready" / "almost" / "not ready")
- Action items (ranked list of fixes)
STOP: If score >= 6 AND verdict ∈ {"ready", "almost"} (exact — "not ready" does NOT qualify)
Phase C: Implement Fixes
Priority: metric additions > reframing > new experiments
Phase D: Wait for Results
Monitor remote experiments
Phase E: Document Round
Append to review-stage/AUTO_REVIEW.md:
## Round N (timestamp)
### Assessment (Summary)
- Score: X/10
- Verdict: [ready/almost/not ready]
- Key criticisms: [bullet list]
### Reviewer Raw Response
<details>
<summary>Click to expand full reviewer response</summary>
[Paste the COMPLETE raw response here — verbatim, unedited.]
</details>
### Actions Taken
- [what was implemented/changed]
### Results
- [experiment outcomes, if any]
### Status
- [continuing to round N+1 / stopping]
Write review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.json with current state.
Termination
- Set
review-stage/REVIEW_STATE.jsonstatus to "completed" - Write final summary
Key Rules
- Large file handling: If the Write tool fails due to file size, immediately retry using Bash (
cat << 'EOF' > file) to write in chunks. Do NOT ask the user for permission — just do it silently.
- Anti-hallucination citations: When adding references, NEVER fabricate BibTeX. Use DBLP → CrossRef →
[VERIFY]chain. Do NOT generate BibTeX from memory. - Be honest about weaknesses
- Implement fixes BEFORE re-reviewing
- Document everything
- Include previous context in round 2+ prompts
- Prefer MCP tool over curl when available
Prompt Template for Round 2+
mcp__llm-chat__chat:
system: "You are a senior ML reviewer (NeurIPS/ICML level)."
prompt: |
[Round N/MAX_ROUNDS of autonomous review loop]
## Previous Review Summary (Round N-1)
- Previous Score: X/10
- Previous Verdict: [ready/almost/not ready]
- Previous Key Weaknesses: [list]
## Changes Since Last Review
1. [Action 1]: [result]
2. [Action 2]: [result]
## Updated Results
[paste updated metrics/tables]
Please re-score and re-assess:
1. Score this work 1-10 for a top venue
2. List remaining critical weaknesses (ranked by severity)
3. For each weakness, specify the MINIMUM fix
4. State clearly: is this READY for submission? Yes/No/Almost
Be brutally honest. If the work is ready, say so clearly.
Output Protocols
> Follow these shared protocols for all output files:
> - [Output Versioning Protocol](../shared-references/output-versioning.md) — write timestamped file first, then copy to fixed name
> - [Output Manifest Protocol](../shared-references/output-manifest.md) — log every output to MANIFEST.md
> - [Output Language Protocol](../shared-references/output-language.md) — respect the project's language setting
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
skills/auto-review-loop-llm/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 auto-review-loop-llm 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep — Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-cha