post-patch-validation

Post-Patch Validation

Validate a security patch against the reported bug and the surrounding code it affects. Give the

patch author reproducible failures to fix and identify what still needs testing. Apply the same

checks to human and agent patches. The diff, author, upstream implementation, and original proof

of concept alone cannot establish correctness.

When to Use

• A security fix, remediation commit, patch file, or pull request already exists.
• An AI-generated patch needs validation before human review or merge.
• A fix may cover one exploit path while missing variants of the same root cause.
• A security fix may alter legitimate behavior or introduce a new vulnerability.
• A patch author needs concrete failures and coverage gaps before another revision.

When NOT to Use

• No patch exists yet; use vulnerability discovery or fix implementation first.
• The task is to review an audit finding against a report without executing patch evidence.
• The task is only to convert a finding into a permanent project test.
• The target is remote or production. This skill executes local code and tests only.
• The user has not authorized execution of the repository's code or test suite.

Quick Start

1. Pin the vulnerable base and patched input. Prefer immutable commits. For uncommitted work,

create a binary patch file first; do not validate in the user's working tree.

1. Scaffold a pinned plan:

   uv run {baseDir}/scripts/post_patch_validation.py scaffold \
     --repo . \
     --base-ref <vulnerable-ref> \
     --patched-ref <patched-ref> \
     --finding-id <stable-id> \
     --finding-summary "<root cause and impact>" \
     --evidence-level runtime \
     --output post-patch-validation/plan.json

Use --patch-file <path> instead of --patched-ref for a patch artifact. Choose the highest

honest evidence level: source for source/patch invariants only, build when target code is

compiled or analyzed but the reported behavior is not executed, or runtime when the checks

execute the reported behavior and its safety assertions.

1. Inspect the finding, diff, callers, sibling paths, cleanup/error paths, and existing tests.

Populate checks in the generated plan. Run print-schema for the structural schema:

   uv run {baseDir}/scripts/post_patch_validation.py print-schema

1. Run validate-plan for the complete validation, including coverage, command restrictions,

and pinned inputs, before executing code:

   uv run {baseDir}/scripts/post_patch_validation.py validate-plan \
     --plan post-patch-validation/plan.json

1. Execute the evidence plan:

   uv run {baseDir}/scripts/post_patch_validation.py run \
     --plan post-patch-validation/plan.json \
     --output post-patch-validation/results

1. Report result.json, report.md, the evidence level, and the complete assessment.

Return each finding to the patch author with its check ID, assertion, and saved logs. Identify

each validation gap separately, including gaps that coexist with supported findings. After

the author revises the patch, pin the new inputs and save a fresh validation run. Preserve the

prior evidence. Passing supplied checks still requires human review before acceptance.

Evidence Contract

The runner rejects incomplete plans. Supply at least one check of every kind:

| Kind | Required observation |

|---|---|

| control | Benign harness succeeds on both base and patch |

| exploit | Original safety assertion fails on base and succeeds on patch |

| variant | A distinct root-cause variant fails on base and succeeds on patch |

| behavior | Unaffected behavior succeeds with byte-identical selected output |

| regression | Targeted non-security regression check succeeds on both revisions |

| security | Adjacent/new-vulnerability check succeeds on base and patch |

| suite | Existing project suite, sanitizer, or deterministic fuzz campaign succeeds on patch |

Commands are argv arrays, never shell strings. Put complex setup in a checked-in or plan artifact

script and invoke it with {plan_dir}. The runner fixes locale/timezone/hash-seed inputs, executes

checks in lexical ID order, records raw stdout/stderr, and never edits the original worktree.

Each check's timeout_seconds defaults to 300 and accepts integers from 1 through 3600.

Exceeding the timeout leaves a validation gap. A timeout alone does not establish a regression.

Every plan also contains a sorted submodules array ([] when none). Scaffolding infers affected

Gitlinks from the changed-file inventory. The runner initializes those pinned commits from the

source repository's existing Git module objects, never from .gitmodules network URLs; initialize

or fetch them in the source repository before validation.

Exploit and variant checks must prove they ran

A nonzero exit does not mean the vulnerability reproduced. An import error, a failed build, a

missing dependency, and a failed safety assertion all exit nonzero and are indistinguishable to the

runner. Every exploit and variant check must print and flush PPV_REACHED immediately

before it evaluates its assertion, on both revisions:

"argv": ["python3", "-c", "import app; value = app.render('<'); print('PPV_REACHED', flush=True); assert value == '&lt;'"]

The token is also in the environment as PPV_REACHED_MARKER. It must land on **stdout, as a line

of its own**. Stderr is not scanned, because a Python SyntaxError traceback echoes the offending

source and would otherwise satisfy the check for a harness that executed nothing. A run without it

leaves a marker_missing gap. Independent findings from other checks remain in the result.

Flush explicitly: a harness whose payload segfaults or calls _exit loses buffered output and forfeits its own evidence.

These checks also run side-blind. {side} is not expanded for them, PPV_SIDE is absent from

their environment, the checkout directory is randomly named, and the plan validator rejects any

exploit or variant check whose argv or env mentions either. An assertion that can see which

revision it is on can assert on that instead of on the code, which is the cheapest possible way

to fake a reproduction followed by a fix.

Environment

Checks run under a fixed minimal environment: PATH, HOME, and a handful of temp/user keys,

plus LANG/LC_ALL=C, TZ=UTC, PYTHONHASHSEED=0, NO_COLOR, TERM=dumb. Everything else in

the caller's environment is dropped. Toolchains that need more get it explicitly:

uv run {baseDir}/scripts/post_patch_validation.py run \
  --plan post-patch-validation/plan.json \
  --output post-patch-validation/results \
  --allow-env JAVA_HOME --allow-env CARGO_HOME

Forwarded names and values are recorded in result.json. A requested variable that is unset is an

error, not an empty string. Two classes are refused outright: names that read as credentials

(SECRET, TOKEN, API_KEY, …), because the value would be written into the result; and

names that change what executes (LD_PRELOAD, BASH_ENV, NODE_OPTIONS, GIT_SSH_COMMAND, …),

because those variables can change which code executes.

The runner's fixed variables and every PPV_* name are also reserved and cannot be forwarded.

Placeholders expanded in argv and per-check env values: {checkout} (the revision under test),

{plan_dir} (an isolated copy of the plan artifacts for that one invocation), {scratch} (a

fresh opaque directory for that one check invocation), and

{side} (base or patched, and not available to exploit/variant checks). The same values

arrive as PPV_CHECKOUT, PPV_PLAN_DIR, PPV_SCRATCH, PPV_SIDE, and PPV_CASE_ID. Write only

under {scratch}; the evidence directory path is not passed to checks. Base and patched invocations

do not share runner-managed scratch, plan, or worktree roots. After each invocation exits, its

scratch tree is archived under the deterministic results/scratch/<check-id-and-side> path, its

private plan copy is discarded, and every readable argv element that resolves to a file is hashed

in argv_files. Files inside the isolated plan or checkout roots are additionally retained under

results/helpers/<sha256> up to 16 MiB; the record explains why any other file was not archived.

Use a dedicated directory for plan.json: its sibling files and directories are copied into each

invocation's {plan_dir}. Keep helper code under that directory's checks/ directory or checked

into the target repository so its bytes are reviewable. The machine plan containing commit pins,

the current output directory, and detected prior result trees are excluded; symlinks are rejected.

The clean snapshot remains only in runner memory, and

exploit/variant sides execute in random order while evidence filenames remain deterministic.

Stdout/stderr use anonymous or randomly named capture descriptors and are copied to the named

evidence files only after the child exits, so fd inspection cannot disclose the side label.

This isolation is not a host sandbox: checks run with the caller's privileges and a malicious

helper could use arbitrary external state or deliberately infer the revision from source or Git

metadata. Inspect the content-addressed helper artifacts, and use an OS/container sandbox when the

check code itself is untrusted.

Active validation worktrees are Git-locked with random owner tokens backed by kernel file locks, so

another concurrent validator cannot prune them and PID reuse cannot impersonate an owner. If the

runner is forcibly killed, the next run unlocks stale validator-owned registrations. For manual

recovery, inspect git worktree list, then use git worktree unlock <path> and

git worktree remove --force <path> (or git worktree prune after the path is gone).

Read [evidence-model.md](references/evidence-model.md) when designing coverage, selecting

variants, or interpreting findings and validation gaps. Do not read it for routine CLI execution.

Coverage Rules

• Derive variants from the root cause, not cosmetic mutations of the original payload.
• Enumerate sibling call sites, alternate callbacks/outputs, error paths, teardown, ownership,

serialization, and boundary values touched by the fix.

• Make each exploit or variant test assert the safe behavior. It must fail on the vulnerable

base; a test that passes on both revisions proves nothing about remediation. Read the base-side

stderr and confirm the failure is the assertion you wrote, not a harness that never got there.

• Keep exploit and variant assertions limited to the security invariant. Test liveness, exact

error types/messages, timing, and compatibility separately as behavior or regression checks;

otherwise an unrelated contract change can masquerade as proof that the vulnerability remains.

• Keep the control harness benign and make it exercise the changed component. It

establishes that the harness works on both revisions. Failed controls leave gaps and prevent

attributing other failures to the patch. The raw observations remain available for review.

• Use behavior only for behavior that should remain unchanged. Exact output comparison is

deliberate; move unstable values behind a deterministic test harness instead of normalizing

them away in prose.

• Make security checks pass on the vulnerable base before treating a patched failure as newly

introduced. A failed baseline leaves attribution unresolved.

• Do not edit the patch during validation. Return failures to the patch author and start a new,

freshly pinned run.

Reading the result

result.json schema 2.0 contains an assessment with status, findings, gaps, and

human_review_required. Status is complete when all required checks produced usable evidence,

even if some checks found failures. Status is incomplete when any gap remains. Findings name the

check ID, check kind, and failed expectation. Gaps name the check ID and missing evidence, with a

null check ID for run-level problems such as cleanup failures.

Suite checks run on the patched revision first. A completed failure triggers the same check on

baseline. If baseline passes, report the failure after the patch. If both fail, preserve both logs

and report that attribution is unresolved. Do not assume matching exit codes mean the same failure.

The runner exits 0 for complete checks with no findings, 1 for complete checks with findings,

10 for incomplete validation, and 64 for invalid inputs. Read the artifact even after exit 10:

it can contain supported findings alongside gaps. Source or build evidence cannot establish

runtime behavior. State the evidence level alongside any passing result.

Claude Dynamic Workflow

Claude Code exposes the bundled workflow as /post-patch-validation:validate-patch.

To pass structured inputs through the Workflow tool, use the name without a leading slash:

Workflow({
  name: 'post-patch-validation:validate-patch',
  args: {
    finding: '<finding text or local path>',
    baseRef: '<vulnerable-ref>',
    patchRef: '<patched-ref>',
    workdir: 'post-patch-validation',
  },
})

Use patchFile instead of patchRef when appropriate. The workflow uses fixed coverage

lenses to propose checks and a fixed executor to run this skill. Agents may author test

artifacts. The Python runner records findings and gaps, and reviewers report coverage or evidence

concerns separately. NEEDS_REPAIR returns supported failures even when other checks left gaps.

BLOCKED means evidence is incomplete without a supported failure. Passing checks advance to

READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW only after both evidence reviews approve, otherwise REVIEW_REQUIRED.

The workflow cannot ask questions after launch, so pass every input up front.

Rationalizations to Reject

| Rationalization | Required response |

|---|---|

| "The original PoC no longer works" | Test at least one independent root-cause variant |

| "The exploit failed on base, so it reproduced" | Confirm the marker and that the failure is the assertion, not a broken harness |

| "The full suite passes" | Prove baseline reproduction and targeted behavior explicitly |

| "This matches the upstream/canonical patch" | Treat provenance as context, not evidence |

| "The diff is tiny" | Exercise callers, failure paths, and teardown affected by the change |

| "All supplied checks passed" | Preserve artifacts and require human review |

| "A flaky rerun passed" | Keep the first pinned result; fix nondeterminism before retrying |

| "There is no obvious variant" | Inspect sibling sites and boundaries; otherwise report the missing coverage |