meta-kid-project-planner

meta-kid-project-planner

Junior & guardian persona meta-skill. Turns a child's project idea —

"我要做火山", "I want to build a model rocket", "open a YouTube channel

about insects" — into a kid-friendly step plan PLUS a parent-friendly

oversight pack. The two audiences are concatenated in one markdown

deliverable with clear ## 👦 For You (the kid) / `## 👨‍👩‍👧 For the

Grown-up` sections — a markdown-level workaround for the proposed

audience: primitive (portfolio design §4.2).

Composition philosophy — multi-skill bundled orchestration

This meta-skill uses only OpenSquilla-bundled atomic skills plus

the five built-in step kinds — no external dependencies. The DAG calls

into 5 distinct bundled atomic skills:

| Skill | Step(s) | Role in the DAG |

|---|---|---|

| multi-search-engine | web_research | Find existing how-to guides for the topic |

| deep-research | deep_research | Extra round for SAFETY_REVIEW_REQUIRED or NEEDS_SHOPPING feasibility |

| memory | recall_past_projects, store_project | Per-child memory: what they've already done; what they did this time. Avoids project repeats and builds a learning trajectory. |

| weather | weather_check | When the topic is outdoor / garden / park, pull a 7-day forecast so outline_steps can recommend the best day |

| pptx | kid_deck | When PARENT_SUPERVISION: HANDS_ON, produce a printable slide deck for the kid (visual step-by-step + safety callouts) |

Step kinds used: llm_chat, llm_classify, user_input, skill_exec,

agent.

Vocab card generation is a plain llm_chat step (vocab_cards)

grounded in outputs.outline_steps + outputs.material_list — the LLM

produces 6 age-appropriate cards directly. No external flashcard

skill is required.

Bilingual rendering for LANGUAGE: mixed is also prompt-side in the

relevant steps — no separate translation skill required.

Safety design

Three layers of guardrail:

1. preferences step rejects clearly inappropriate topics by setting

PROJECT_SAFE: no in its contract. This is prompt-side; cannot be

bypassed by clever phrasing because the model's response is

constrained to the return format.

1. feasibility classifier produces INAPPROPRIATE for any topic

that involves weapons, dangerous chemistry, fire-without-adult,

self-harm-adjacent themes. INAPPROPRIATE short-circuits the

project pack and routes to redirect_unsafe.

1. redirect_unsafe produces a gentle, non-shaming redirect with 3

alternative project ideas that scratch the same itch safely.

The skill never silently degrades safety — if the topic is unsafe, the

deliverable IS the redirect, with PACK_DELIVERED: no_safety_redirect.

Honest limitations (first-wave)

• audience: is markdown sections, not real two-principal output.

When the proposed primitive ships, the kid section can go to a

child-facing surface while the parent section goes to the guardian's

channel, separately.

• No persistence of past projects. Each invocation is independent

— without state:, the skill cannot remember which projects the

child has already done.

• Vocab cards do not feed an FSRS deck. The vocab_cards step

emits a one-shot card list; integrating with a spaced-repetition

state machine is reserved for a future meta-spaced-rep-coach.

• Topic safety relies on prompt-side guardrails. A future

dedicated safety-policy step kind would be more robust than

prompt-side judgment under adversarial inputs.