lex
Centralized 'Truth Engine' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contract scaffolding.
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
LEX: Legal-Entity-X-ref
Overview
LEX is a structured truth engine designed to eliminate legal hallucinations by grounding agents in verified government references and legislation across 29+ jurisdictions. It provides deterministic context for business formation, employment, and contract drafting.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when you need to cross-reference or compare legal requirements between different territories, such as verifying the compliance gap between an EU SARL and a US LLC.
- Use when working with foundational business or employment documents that require specific, jurisdiction-compliant clauses to be inserted into a professional scaffold.
- Use when the user asks about the specific regulatory nuances, formation steps, or "truth-based" definitions of legal entities within the 29 supported jurisdictions (USA, Canada, and the EU).
How It Works
Step 1: Identify Jurisdiction
Before drafting, determine if the user's entity or contract target is in the USA, Canada, or the EU.
Step 2: Search & Fetch Context
Use the CLI shortcuts to find the relevant legal patterns and templates.
- Run
lex search <query>to find matching templates. - Run
lex get <path>to read the granular metadata and requirements.
Step 3: Scaffold Drafting
Generate foundation-level documents using lex draft <description>. This ensures that all drafts include the mandatory AI-generated content disclaimer.
Step 4: Verify Authority
Always include a "Verified Sources" section in your output by running lex verify, which fetches official government links for the retrieved context.
Examples
Example 1: Comparing Employment Laws
# Get the workforce template to compare US vs EU notice periods
lex get templates/02_employment_workforce.md
Example 2: Drafting a Czech Contract
# Create a house sale contract scaffold in Czech language
lex draft "Czech house sale contract"
Best Practices
- ✅ Trust but Verify: Always include the links provided by
lex verifyin your output. - ✅ Table Formatting: Use tables when comparing results across multiple jurisdictions.
- ❌ No Guessing: If a jurisdiction is outside the US/EU/CA scope, state that it is outside the LEX "Truth Engine" coverage.
- ❌ No Anecdotal Advice: Stick strictly to the findings in the templates or verified government domains.
Common Pitfalls
- Problem: Legal hallucination regarding specific EU notice periods.
Solution: Run lex get templates/02_employment_workforce.md to see the restrictive covenant comparison table.
Related Skills
@employment-contract-templates- For more specific HR policy phrasing.@legal-advisor- For general legal framework architecture.@security-auditor- For reviewing the final repository security.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 lex 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills — Centralized 'Truth Engine' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contrac
- sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills — Centralized 'Truth Engine' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contrac