efficient-web-research
>
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Efficient Web Research Skill
A protocol for accessing web content in the most token-efficient, accurate, and structured way —
using the right tool at the right depth, and stopping as soon as the question is answerable.
When to Use
- Use this skill when the task matches this description: Protocol for token-efficient web research. Use when accessing URLs, GitHub repos, or running search queries. Prevents full-page fetching waste.
Core Principle
> Fetch the minimum needed to answer. Skim before you dive. Stop when you can answer.
Every unnecessary fetch wastes tokens and adds noise. This skill enforces a layered approach
where you escalate fetch depth only when shallower layers fail.
Step 1 — Classify the Input
Before fetching anything, identify what kind of input you received:
| Input Type | Example | Go To |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub repo URL | github.com/user/repo | [GitHub Protocol](#github-protocol) |
| Specific page URL | docs.python.org/3/library/os | [URL Protocol](#url-protocol) |
| Topic / query (no URL) | "how does RAFT consensus work" | [Search Protocol](#search-protocol) |
| Multiple URLs | List of links | [Multi-URL Protocol](#multi-url-protocol) |
| PDF / file link | .pdf, .txt, .md URL | [File Protocol](#file-protocol) |
GitHub Protocol
Use when input is a GitHub URL (repo, file, PR, issue, etc.)
Step 1 — Parse the URL
github.com/{owner}/{repo} → Repo root
github.com/{owner}/{repo}/tree/{branch} → Directory
github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{branch}/{path} → Single file
github.com/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n} → Issue
github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{n} → Pull request
Step 2 — Use GitHub API (preferred over scraping)
Always prefer the GitHub API. It returns clean JSON — no HTML parsing needed.
# Repo metadata (name, description, language, stars, topics)
GET https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}
# File tree (see what files exist — very cheap)
GET https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/trees/{ref}?recursive=1
# Single file content (base64 encoded)
GET https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/{path}?ref={ref}
# README only (usually enough to understand the repo)
GET https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/readme
Step 3 — Layered Fetch for Repos
Layer 1 (always do first):
→ Fetch repo metadata + README only
→ Can you answer the user's question now? YES → STOP. NO → continue.
Layer 2 (only if needed):
→ Fetch file tree to understand structure
→ Identify the 1-3 most relevant files based on the question
→ Can you answer now? YES → STOP. NO → continue.
Layer 3 (last resort):
→ Fetch specific relevant files only (never fetch all files)
→ Prioritize: main entry point, config files, key modules
Token Rules for GitHub
- README alone answers ~70% of "what does this repo do" questions — always try it first
- Never fetch more than 3 files in a single research turn
- If a file exceeds ~300 lines, read only the top (imports + class/function signatures)
- Decode base64 content from API before passing to context
URL Protocol
Use when the user gives a specific non-GitHub URL (docs, articles, blogs, etc.)
Step 1 — Assess the URL type
| Site type | Likely works with | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Static docs / MDN / ReadTheDocs | read_url_content | Fast, clean, cheap |
| News articles / blogs | read_url_content | Usually fine |
| SPAs / React/Next.js apps | browser_subagent | JS-rendered |
| Auth-gated pages | browser_subagent | Needs login |
| Raw GitHub files (raw.githubusercontent) | read_url_content | Direct text |
Step 2 — Layered Fetch
Layer 1 — Skim
→ Fetch the URL with read_url_content
→ Read only headings (H1, H2, H3) and first paragraph
→ Does this page contain what the user needs? NO → try a different URL or search. YES → continue.
Layer 2 — Targeted Extract
→ If the page has anchor links (e.g. /docs/page#section), fetch with the anchor
→ Extract only the relevant section (200–500 tokens max)
→ Can you answer? YES → STOP.
Layer 3 — Full Fetch
→ Fetch full page, strip boilerplate (nav, footer, ads, cookie banners, sidebars)
→ Cap at 2000 tokens. Summarize before passing to answer.
Layer 4 — Browser Subagent (last resort only)
→ Use ONLY if read_url_content returns empty, garbled, or JS-placeholder content
→ Instruct subagent: "Navigate to [URL], wait for content to load, extract [specific section]"
→ Do NOT use browser_subagent for static pages — it's expensive
What to Strip from Fetched Pages
Always remove before using fetched content:
- Navigation menus and breadcrumbs
- Cookie banners and GDPR notices
- "Related articles" / "You might also like" blocks
- Footer content (copyright, links)
- Social share buttons
- Ads and sponsored content
Extract and keep:
- Main article / documentation body
- Code blocks
- Tables with data
- Numbered steps or procedures
Search Protocol
Use when the user gives a topic, question, or query — not a specific URL.
Step 1 — Sharpen the Query Before Searching
Do NOT search the raw user query. Transform it first:
Raw: "how to deploy fastapi on aws"
Sharpened: "fastapi AWS deployment tutorial 2024"
Raw: "python async vs threads"
Sharpened: "Python asyncio vs threading performance comparison"
Raw: "best way to structure react project"
Sharpened: "React project folder structure best practices"
Query sharpening rules:
- Add specificity: version numbers, technology names, "tutorial" / "guide" / "comparison"
- Add recency if relevant: current year
- Remove filler words: "how do I", "what is the", "can you explain"
- For code questions: add the language + framework name explicitly
Step 2 — Search and Select
1. Run search_web with the sharpened query
2. Get results (titles + snippets)
3. Scan titles + snippets ONLY — do not fetch yet
4. Pick the TOP 1-2 most relevant results (max 3 in complex cases)
5. Skip results from: forums (if docs exist), aggregator blogs, paywalled sites
6. Prefer: official docs, GitHub repos, well-known tech blogs, academic sources
Step 3 — Fetch Selected Results
Apply the URL Protocol (above) to each selected URL.
Process results one at a time — only fetch the second URL if the first didn't answer the question.
Token Rules for Search
- Never read more than 3 URLs per search query
- If the snippet already contains the answer → do NOT fetch the full page, use the snippet
- For factual questions (dates, names, simple facts) → snippet is usually enough
- For procedural questions (how to do X) → fetch 1 relevant page, targeted section only
Multi-URL Protocol
Use when the user provides a list of URLs to compare or summarize.
1. Skim all URLs first (Layer 1 fetch for each)
2. Group by relevance to the user's question
3. Deep-fetch only the most relevant 1-3 URLs
4. Summarize each in 3-5 sentences before combining
5. Never dump raw content from multiple pages — always summarize per-source first
File Protocol
Use when URL points directly to a file (PDF, .txt, .md, .csv, etc.)
.md/.txt/.csv→read_url_contentworks directly, read full content.pdf→ Use browser_subagent or a PDF extraction tool; extract text only.json/.yaml→read_url_content, parse structure, summarize schema + key values- Large files (>500 lines) → Read first 100 lines + last 20 lines + search for relevant sections
Anti-Patterns (Never Do These)
| Anti-pattern | Why it's bad | Do this instead |
|---|---|---|
| Fetching full page for a simple fact | Wastes 1000s of tokens | Use snippet or targeted anchor |
| Using browser_subagent for static sites | Very expensive | Use read_url_content first |
| Searching with the raw user query | Vague results | Sharpen query first |
| Fetching 5+ search results | Token explosion | Max 3, stop when answered |
| Dumping raw HTML into context | Noisy, wasteful | Always strip to Markdown |
| Fetching "just in case" | Unnecessary tokens | Only fetch what's needed to answer |
| Re-fetching the same URL | Redundant | Cache result in context, reuse |
| Fetching entire GitHub repo | Extremely wasteful | README + targeted files only |
Decision Flowchart (Quick Reference)
Input received
│
├─ GitHub URL?
│ ├─ Fetch README + metadata via API
│ ├─ Answered? → STOP
│ ├─ Need more? → Fetch file tree, pick 1-3 files
│ └─ Still need more? → Fetch specific files only
│
├─ Specific URL?
│ ├─ Try read_url_content → skim headings
│ ├─ Answered? → STOP
│ ├─ Need more? → Targeted section fetch
│ ├─ Still need more? → Full fetch, stripped
│ └─ JS-rendered / broken? → browser_subagent (last resort)
│
├─ Topic/query?
│ ├─ Sharpen query
│ ├─ search_web → scan snippets
│ ├─ Snippet enough? → Answer from snippet, STOP
│ ├─ Need more? → Fetch top 1 result (targeted)
│ └─ Still need more? → Fetch top 2nd result (targeted)
│
└─ List of URLs?
├─ Skim all (Layer 1 each)
├─ Deep fetch top 1-3 relevant ones
└─ Summarize per-source, then combine
Output Format Rules
After fetching, structure your response as:
Source: [URL or "Web search for: query"]
Summary: [2-5 sentences of what was found]
Answer: [Direct answer to user's question]
Confidence: [High / Medium / Low — based on source quality]
For multiple sources:
Source 1: ...
Source 2: ...
Combined Answer: ...
Never output:
- Raw HTML fragments
- Full page dumps
- Unattributed information
- More than needed to answer the question
Token Budget Guide
| Operation | Approximate token cost | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub README fetch | ~300–800 tokens | Always first for repos |
| GitHub API metadata | ~200 tokens | Always for repos |
| Skim (headings only) | ~100–200 tokens | Always first for URLs |
| Targeted section fetch | ~300–600 tokens | When skim isn't enough |
| Full page fetch (stripped) | ~1000–2000 tokens | Only when targeted fails |
| browser_subagent | ~2000–5000 tokens | Last resort only |
| Search snippet scan | ~300–500 tokens | Always before fetching |
Rule of thumb: If you're about to spend >2000 tokens on a fetch, ask yourself if there's a cheaper path first.
Limitations
- JavaScript Reliance: Standard fetching may not fully render Single Page Applications (SPAs). You must fallback to
browser_subagentfor these, which is slower and more expensive. - Paywalls & Protections: This skill cannot bypass CAPTCHAs, bot protections (e.g., strict Cloudflare rules), or hard paywalls.
- GitHub API Limits: Frequent GitHub API requests without authentication may hit rate limits.
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/efficient-web-research/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 efficient-web-research 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: