跳到主要内容
知知仓学习社ZHICANG

debate-review

Two-model debate review of a GitHub PR, GitLab MR, Azure DevOps PR, or

不碰外部（只输出文字）无严重或高危命中sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少6 个文本文件，21 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部（只输出文字）
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实，不是结论。命中多不等于有毒（安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法），命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系，需要你自己看。

技能内容

debate-review

When to Use

  • You have a GitHub PR or GitLab MR that needs a thorough pre-merge review.
  • You want a two-model debate (main reviewer vs. debate reviewer) to catch blind spots before posting inline comments.

Two models argue before anything is posted. A main reviewer finds issues. A debate reviewer tries to

knock them down and may add its own. The main reviewer then makes the final call, and one review with

inline comments lands on the PR or MR. It posts from the user's own gh, glab or az account as a

non-approval review or comment. It never approves and never requests changes.

You are the orchestrator. You run one command and relay the result. You do not review the diff

yourself, and you do not touch the PR.

Run it

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/review-pr.mjs" --local [--base <ref>]
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/review-pr.mjs" <pr-url | number> [--dry-run]
  • If the user wants a review and there is no PR/MR URL, run --local from the repo (or --repo-dir). Do not invent a URL. Relay stdout. --local never talks to a forge and rejects non-UTF-8 Git paths rather than decoding them lossily.
  • <pr-url> is a GitHub /pull/N, GitLab /-/merge_requests/N, or Azure DevOps

/_git/<repo>/pullrequest/N URL (dev.azure.com or the legacy *.visualstudio.com). A bare number

resolves against the cwd's origin, including Azure DevOps https and ssh.dev.azure.com:v3/ remotes.

  • --dry-run prints a live PR review instead of posting it. It does not combine with --local.
  • Azure DevOps needs az logged in (az login) with access to the project. No extension is required,

the script talks to the REST API through az rest. A review there is N inline comment threads plus

one closed summary thread, since Azure DevOps has no single review object; the alert blockquotes

render as plain quotes, which still read.

  • The reviewers are two delegate-skills lanes, review-main and review-debate. If either is missing

the script says so. Add them with delegate-setup. Pick two different implementers, since the debate

is only worth something when the second model doesn't share the first one's blind spots (main

claude or grok, debate codex at high effort is a good pair). For a one-off, pass

--main <implementer> or --debate <implementer>. Only implementers whose relay has --read-only

are accepted. These two lanes belong to the reviewer. Don't point them at a lane you use for other

work, such as a plan-debate lane.

  • Exit code 3 means this head sha already has a debate-review. Re-run with --force to post again.
  • A run takes minutes, since it is two or three implementer sessions back to back. Run it in the

background and report the printed URL when it finishes. Don't poll tightly.

All flags: --help. Contracts: [references/schema.md](references/schema.md). What gets posted:

[references/comment-format.md](references/comment-format.md). The reviewer briefs live in assets/prompts/

and the script fills them in; you don't need to read them.

After it posts

Each posted comment carries a <!-- debate-review:<id> status=... --> marker. babysit-pr handles

GitHub and GitLab rounds (verify, fix blockers, reply, resolve). It cannot harvest Azure DevOps yet,

so relay Azure findings directly to the user. Don't act on the findings yourself unless asked.

Artifacts

~/.cache/debate-review/<owner>__<repo>/<N>/<head>/ holds run.json (all three documents, timings,

what was posted) plus main/, debate/, and final/, each with the brief sent and the relay's

result.json.

--local writes under ~/.cache/debate-review/local/<repo>/<branch>/<head>/ instead.

Limitations

  • Requires delegate-skills with review-main and review-debate lanes and authenticated gh/glab.
  • Docs-only import — executable helpers (scripts/) not included; see upstream for full runtime. Posts a single COMMENT review only.

> Adapted from amElnagdy/review-skills (MIT) — docs-only, runtime not bundled.

想直接用这个技能？

本站把开放许可（MIT / Apache 等）的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘，点一下转存到你自己的网盘，不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接，不打包。

去原始仓库

它属于哪个仓库

仓库sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
星标★ 46,490
本站分层T1
该仓技能数6676
原文件路径plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/debate-review/SKILL.md

同一个仓库里的其他技能

看这个仓库的全部 6676 个技能

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 debate-review 的技能。它们内容并不相同，别混用：