跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

agents-md

Create, revise, or audit AGENTS.md files from repository evidence, verified commands, and correctly scoped instructions without overwriting maintain…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,9 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Maintain AGENTS.md from repository evidence

Overview

Create or improve agent instructions that help a coding agent change the

repository correctly without rediscovering its workflow. Base every

repository-specific command, path, and rule on evidence in the current

checkout.

Prefer a focused diff over a wholesale rewrite. There is no universal line

limit, required section list, symlink layout, or commit-attribution policy;

follow the repository's own needs and maintainer intent.

When to Use

  • The user asks to create, update, shorten, or audit AGENTS.md.
  • A monorepo needs root instructions plus narrower package-level overrides.
  • Existing agent instructions contain stale commands, duplicated policy, or

unsupported claims.

  • The user wants to reconcile AGENTS.md with CLAUDE.md,

.github/copilot-instructions.md, or other repository instruction files.

Use @agents-generator instead when the task specifically calls for its

packaged generation modes, assets, or backup workflow. Use this skill when a

maintainer-readable, evidence-first edit is the primary goal.

How It Works

1. Preserve existing intent

Before writing, read every instruction file that applies to the target path,

including existing AGENTS.md files and relevant tool-specific files such as

CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, and

.github/instructions/*.instructions.md.

  • Improve an existing AGENTS.md in place when possible.
  • Preserve accurate maintainer-authored rules and repository-specific policy.
  • Do not replace another tool's instruction file with a symlink unless the

user requests it and repository evidence shows identical content is desired.

  • Do not silently choose between conflicting instructions. Follow the

higher-priority applicable rule, or ask when the intended policy cannot be

established from the repository.

2. Build a bounded evidence map

Inspect only enough of the repository to establish how work is actually done:

  1. Read the project overview and contribution guidance, such as README*,

CONTRIBUTING*, and relevant docs.

  1. Read manifests, lockfiles, workspace files, task runners, and build config

to identify supported tools and exact commands.

  1. Read CI workflows to learn required checks. Do not assume every CI or

deployment job is safe or appropriate to run locally.

  1. Inspect representative source and test files for naming, layout, and test

conventions.

  1. Identify generated files, migrations, vendored code, large fixtures,

secrets boundaries, and production-only operations.

Prefer rg --files and rg for discovery when available. Track the source of

each non-obvious command or rule so unsupported claims do not enter the final

file.

3. Choose the instruction scope

Use the root AGENTS.md for repository-wide guidance. Add or revise a nested

AGENTS.md only when a subtree has materially different commands,

architecture, conventions, or safety boundaries.

Keep shared rules at the root and only differences in nested files. For tools

that implement the public AGENTS.md convention, the nearest file in the

directory tree controls the working subtree. Do not copy the full root file

into every package.

4. Write high-signal guidance

Choose headings that fit the repository instead of forcing a fixed template.

Include the following only when supported by evidence:

  • Repository map: the few directories and boundaries an agent must know.
  • Setup and commands: exact install, development, build, lint, type-check,

and test commands, with the working directory when it is not obvious.

  • Focused validation: targeted checks for a small change and broader checks

required before handoff.

  • Change rules: generated-file ownership, migrations, schemas, APIs,

dependencies, and cross-package coordination.

  • Safety boundaries: secrets, production data, destructive commands,

deployments, and operations that require explicit authorization.

  • Contribution rules: repository-specific naming, formatting, commit, or

pull-request requirements that affect implementation or handoff.

Write direct, testable statements. Prefer:

- From the repository root, run `npm test -- path/to/file.test.ts` for a focused test.

over:

- Make sure tests pass and follow best practices.

Link to maintained documentation instead of copying it. Distinguish required

checks from optional, slow, privileged, or deployment-only checks.

5. Validate before handoff

  1. Re-read each changed AGENTS.md completely.
  2. Remove contradictions, duplicate rules, placeholders, and stale claims.
  3. Confirm every mentioned file and directory exists.
  4. Cross-check commands against manifests or CI, and run safe, proportionate

checks when useful.

  1. If nested files changed, confirm each contains only subtree-specific rules

and does not conflict accidentally with the root.

  1. Review the diff as a maintainer: every added line should change an agent's

decision or prevent a realistic mistake.

Report the files changed, evidence used, checks actually run, and unresolved

uncertainty. Never say a command was tested when it was only read from config.

Examples

Create a focused root file

Evidence found:

  • package-lock.json selects npm.
  • package.json defines lint, typecheck, and test scripts.
  • CI runs those three checks from the repository root.
  • src/generated/ is produced by npm run generate.

A useful result might include:

# Agent instructions

## Commands
- Run commands from the repository root.
- Install with `npm ci`.
- For handoff, run `npm run lint`, `npm run typecheck`, and `npm test`.

## Generated code
- Do not edit `src/generated/` directly; update its source and run `npm run generate`.

Do not add a package manager, command, or generated-file rule that the evidence

did not establish.

Revise without erasing policy

If an existing file has accurate release restrictions but a stale test

command, change only the stale command and any directly affected explanation.

Preserve the release restrictions, even when a shorter replacement would look

cleaner.

Best Practices

  • Keep instructions concise enough to scan, but let repository complexity

determine length.

  • Prefer repository-specific decisions over generic engineering advice.
  • Include targeted commands when the project supports them; do not invent a

file-scoped invocation for a tool that only supports suite-level runs.

  • State where commands run and whether they modify files.
  • Reference formatter and linter config instead of restating every rule.
  • Make tool-specific files additive when their semantics differ; do not assume

all agents interpret formats or precedence identically.

Security & Safety Notes

  • Treat this as a state-changing skill because it may edit repository files.

Review the diff before handoff.

  • Never include secrets, credentials, internal URLs, personal data, or local

environment values in agent instructions.

  • Do not run deployment, publication, database mutation, history rewrite, or

other consequential commands merely to validate documentation.

  • Preserve approval gates already present in repository policy.
  • Do not upload private repository instructions to third-party services. Ask

for explicit consent before transmitting any repository content externally.

Common Pitfalls

  • Guessing commands: infer tools from manifests and CI, not popularity.
  • Forcing one layout: a symlink or a fixed section list may erase

tool-specific or maintainer-authored guidance.

  • Overwriting an existing file: make the smallest evidence-backed change.
  • Copying the README: include only information that changes agent behavior.
  • Duplicating nested files: keep shared guidance at the root and local

differences near the relevant code.

  • Claiming validation that did not run: distinguish inspection from

execution in the handoff.

Limitations

  • Repository evidence can be incomplete or contradictory; ask when a material

policy choice cannot be resolved safely.

  • A documented command may still require credentials, services, or operating

system support that are unavailable locally.

  • AGENTS.md support and precedence vary across coding tools; verify the target

tool when interoperability matters.

  • This skill improves instruction quality but cannot prove that every future

agent will follow the file correctly.

Related Skills and Tools

  • @agents-generator - packaged generation, dry-run, update, and backup modes.
  • @folder-specific-claude-and-agents-md - deeper guidance for scoped

Claude/AGENTS instruction layouts.

  • agents.md - public format and scope guidance.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 agents-md 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: