phoenix-contexts
Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+), Ecto.Multi,
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Phoenix Contexts Reference
> Ash projects: Ash.Domain replaces Phoenix contexts for data access — use the ash-framework skill. Context boundary and PubSub patterns still apply.
Reference for designing and implementing Phoenix contexts (bounded contexts).
Iron Laws — Never Violate These
- CONTEXTS OWN THEIR DATA — Never query another context's schema directly via Repo
- SCOPES ARE MANDATORY (Phoenix 1.8+) — Every context function MUST accept scope as first parameter
- THIN CONTROLLERS/LIVEVIEWS — Controllers translate HTTP, business logic stays in contexts
- NO SIDE EFFECTS IN SCHEMAS — Use
Ecto.Multifor transactions with side effects
Context Structure
lib/my_app/
├── accounts/ # Context directory
│ ├── user.ex # Schema
│ ├── scope.ex # Scope struct (Phoenix 1.8+)
├── accounts.ex # Context module (public API)
Phoenix 1.8+ Scopes (CRITICAL)
All context functions MUST accept scope as first parameter:
def list_posts(%Scope{} = scope) do
from(p in Post, where: p.user_id == ^scope.user.id)
|> Repo.all()
end
def create_post(%Scope{} = scope, attrs) do
%Post{user_id: scope.user.id}
|> Post.changeset(attrs)
|> Repo.insert()
|> broadcast(scope, :created)
end
Quick Decisions
When to SPLIT contexts?
- Module exceeds ~400 lines
- Functions don't share domain language
- Could theoretically be a separate microservice
- Team member could own it independently
When to KEEP together?
- Resources share vocabulary and domain concepts
- Functions frequently operate on same data together
- Splitting would create excessive cross-context calls
Cross-Context References
# ✅ Reference by ID, convert at boundary
def create_order(%Scope{} = scope, user_id, product_ids) do
with {:ok, user} <- Accounts.fetch_user(scope, user_id) do
do_create_order(scope, user.id, product_ids)
end
end
# ❌ Reaching into other context's internals
alias MyApp.Accounts.User # Don't do this
Repo.all(from o in Order, join: u in User, ...) # Don't query other schemas
Anti-patterns
| Wrong | Right |
|-------|-------|
| Service objects (UserCreationService) | Context functions (Accounts.create_user/2) |
| Repository pattern wrapping Repo | Repo IS the repository |
| Direct Repo calls in controllers | Delegate to context |
| Schema callbacks with side effects | Use Ecto.Multi |
Version Notes
- Phoenix 1.8+: Uses built-in
%Scope{}struct for authorization context - Phoenix 1.7: Requires manual authorization context (see
references/scopes-auth.md"Pre-Scopes Patterns")
References
For detailed patterns, see:
references/context-patterns.md- Full context module, PubSub, Multi, cross-boundaryreferences/scopes-auth.md- Scope struct, multi-tenant, authorization, plugsreferences/routing-patterns.md- Verified routes, pipelines, API authreferences/plug-patterns.md- Function/module plugs, placement, guardsreferences/json-api-patterns.md- JSON controllers, FallbackController, API auth
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
targets/amp/skills/phoenix-contexts/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 6 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 phoenix-contexts 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix — Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+), Ecto.Multi, PubSub, ro
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix — Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+); Use
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix — Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+), Ecto.Multi,
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix — Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+), Ecto.Multi,
- oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix — Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+), Ecto.Multi,