跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

nw-source-verification

Source reputation tiers, cross-referencing methodology, bias detection, and citation format requirements

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中nWave-ai/nWave

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,2 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Source Verification

Source Reputation Tiers

Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.

| Tier | Score | Examples | Verification |

|------|-------|---------|-------------|

| High | 1.0 | Academic (.edu, arxiv.org, ieee.org), Official (.gov, w3.org, ietf.org), Tech docs (developer.mozilla.org), OSS foundations (apache.org, cncf.io) | Standard citation |

| Medium-High | 0.8 | Industry leaders (martinfowler.com, stackoverflow.com, infoq.com) | Cross-ref with 1+ high-tier |

| Medium | 0.6 | Community (medium.com verified experts, dev.to, hashnode.com) | Author verification + 3-source cross-ref |

| Excluded | 0.0 | Unverified blogs (*.blogspot.com, wordpress.com), quora.com, pastebin.com | Reject, log warning, find alternative |

Cross-Referencing Methodology

  1. Identify the specific assertion to verify
  2. Find 2+ independent sources not citing each other (avoid circular refs)
  3. Verify independence: different authors, publishers, organizations
  4. Compare: agree on substance (minor wording differences OK)
  5. Document: verified / partially verified / unverified per finding

Circular Reference Detection

  • Source B cites Source A = one source, not two
  • Multiple sources referencing single study = cite the original
  • Prefer primary over secondary sources

Bias Detection Checklist

Evaluate before citing:

  1. Commercial interest: selling related product/service?
  2. Sponsorship: sponsored/funded content?
  3. Conflict of interest: author benefits from conclusion?
  4. Geographic/cultural bias: limited to single region?
  5. Temporal bias: publication dates skewed to specific era?
  6. Cherry-picking: contradictory evidence acknowledged?
  7. Logical fallacies: correlation as causation, authority without evidence

When bias detected: note in Source Analysis, reduce confidence.

Citation Format

[1] {Author/Organization}. "{Title}". {Publication/Website}. {Date}. {Full URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.

Required Metadata Per Source

Source URL | Domain | Access date | Reputation score (from tiers) | Verification status

Paywalled or Restricted Sources

Mark "[Paywalled]"/"[Restricted Access]" | Provide URL | Find open-access alternative | Note in Knowledge Gaps

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 nw-source-verification 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:

  • nWave-ai/nWave — Source reputation tiers, cross-referencing methodology, bias detection, and citation forma