跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

propose-hypotheses

Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,6 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Propose Hypotheses Workflow

Execute the First Principles Framework (FPF) cycle: generate competing hypotheses, verify logic, validate evidence, audit trust, and produce a decision.

User Input

Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS

Workflow Execution

Step 1a: Create Directory Structure (Main Agent)

Create .fpf/ directory structure if it does not exist:

mkdir -p .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}
touch .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}/.gitkeep

Postcondition: .fpf/ directory scaffold exists.


Step 1b: Initialize Context (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Initialize FPF context"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/init-context.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS

  **Write**: Context summary to `.fpf/context.md`**

Step 2: Generate Hypotheses (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Generate L0 hypotheses"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/generate-hypotheses.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
  Context: <summary from Step 1b>

  **Write**: List of hypothesis IDs and titles to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`

  Reply with summary table in markdown format:

    | ID | Title | Kind | Scope |
    |----|-------|------|-------|
    | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Step 3: Present Summary (Main Agent)

  1. Read all L0 hypothesis files from .fpf/knowledge/L0/
  2. Present summary table from agent response.
  3. Ask user: "Would you like to add any hypotheses of your own? (yes/no)"

Step 4: Add User Hypothesis (FPF Agent, Conditional Loop)

Condition: User says yes to adding hypotheses.

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Add user hypothesis"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/add-user-hypothesis.md and execute.

  User Hypothesis Description: <get from user>

  **Write**: User hypothesis to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`

Loop: Return to Step 3 after hypothesis is added.

Exit: When user says no or declines to add more.


Step 5: Verify Logic (Parallel Sub-Agents)

Condition: User finished adding hypotheses.

For EACH L0 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L0/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Verify hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/verify-logic.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L0/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Move**: After you complete verification, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L1/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.

Wait for all agents, then check that files are moved to .fpf/knowledge/L1/ or .fpf/knowledge/invalid/.


Step 6: Validate Evidence (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L1 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L1/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Validate hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/validate-evidence.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L1/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Move**: After you complete validation, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L2/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.

Wait for all agents, then check that files are moved to .fpf/knowledge/L2/ or .fpf/knowledge/invalid/.


Step 7: Audit Trust (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L2 hypothesis file in .fpf/knowledge/L2/, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Audit trust: <hypothesis-id>"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/audit-trust.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L2/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Write**: Audit report to `.fpf/evidence/audit-{hypothesis-id}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`

  **Reply**: with R_eff score and weakest link

Wait for all agents, then check that audit reports are created in .fpf/evidence/.


Step 8: Make Decision (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:

  • Description: "Create decision record"
  • Prompt:
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/decide.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
  L2 Hypotheses Directory: .fpf/knowledge/L2/
  Audit Reports: .fpf/evidence/

  **Write**: Decision record to `.fpf/decisions/`

  **Reply**: with decision record summary in markdown format:

  | Hypothesis | R_eff | Weakest Link | Status |
  |------------|-------|--------------|--------|
  | ... | ... | ... | ... |

  **Recommended Decision**: <hypothesis title>

  **Rationale**: <brief explanation>

Wait for agent, then check that decision record is created in .fpf/decisions/.


Step 9: Present Final Summary (Main Agent)

  1. Read the DRR from .fpf/decisions/
  2. Present results from agent response.
  3. Present next steps:
  • Implement the selected hypothesis
  • Use /fpf:status to check FPF state
  • Use /fpf:actualize if codebase changes
  1. Ask user if he agree with the decision, if not launch fpf-agent at step 8 with instruction to modify the decision as user wants.

Completion

Workflow complete when:

  • [ ] .fpf/ directory structure exists
  • [ ] Context recorded in .fpf/context.md
  • [ ] Hypotheses generated, verified, validated, and audited
  • [ ] DRR created in .fpf/decisions/
  • [ ] Final summary presented to user

Artifacts Created:

  • .fpf/context.md - Problem context
  • .fpf/knowledge/L0/*.md - Initial hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/L1/*.md - Verified hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/L2/*.md - Validated hypotheses
  • .fpf/knowledge/invalid/*.md - Rejected hypotheses
  • .fpf/evidence/*.md - Evidence files
  • .fpf/decisions/*.md - Design Rationale Record

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

它属于哪个仓库

星标★ 1,702
本站分层T1
该仓技能数204
原文件路径skills/propose-hypotheses/SKILL.md

同一个仓库里的其他技能

看这个仓库的全部 204 个技能

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 propose-hypotheses 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: