implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent
Implements policy-as-code enforcement with Open Policy Agent (OPA)
它会碰到什么
关于「读环境变量(配置)」:这个技能会读 process.env 之类的环境变量,但读到的都是端口、目录、超时这类配置项,没有读取密钥类变量。扫描规则原本把「读环境变量」一律算作「读凭据」,本站按变量名做了细化区分,命中明细仍如实列在下面。
逐条看命中(7 条严重或高危)
- 高
scripts/agent.py:23cred-envreadcustom_path = os.environ.get("OPA_PATH") - 高
scripts/agent.py:27cred-envreadfor directory in os.environ.get("PATH", "").split(os.pathsep): - 高
scripts/agent.py:45exec-spawnresult = subprocess.run(
- 高
scripts/agent.py:81exec-spawnresult = subprocess.run(
- 高
scripts/agent.py:97exec-spawnresult = subprocess.run(
- 高
scripts/process.py:50exec-spawnproc = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=120)
- 高
scripts/process.py:91exec-spawnproc = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30)
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Implementing Policy as Code with Open Policy Agent
When to Use
- When enforcing organizational security policies across Kubernetes clusters programmatically
- When requiring admission control that blocks non-compliant resources from being created
- When implementing policy governance that can be version-controlled, tested, and audited
- When standardizing security rules across multiple clusters and environments
- When needing a flexible policy engine that extends beyond Kubernetes to APIs and CI/CD
Do not use for vulnerability scanning (use Trivy/Checkov), for runtime threat detection (use Falco), or for network policy enforcement (use Kubernetes NetworkPolicy or Calico).
Prerequisites
- Kubernetes cluster with admin access for Gatekeeper installation
- Helm for Gatekeeper deployment
- OPA CLI or conftest for local policy testing
- Rego knowledge for policy authoring
Workflow
Step 1: Install OPA Gatekeeper
# Install Gatekeeper via Helm
helm repo add gatekeeper https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/charts
helm install gatekeeper gatekeeper/gatekeeper \
--namespace gatekeeper-system --create-namespace \
--set replicas=3 \
--set audit.replicas=1 \
--set audit.writeToRAMDisk=true
Step 2: Create Constraint Templates
# templates/k8s-required-labels.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8srequiredlabels
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
labels:
type: array
items:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8srequiredlabels
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
provided := {label | input.review.object.metadata.labels[label]}
required := {label | label := input.parameters.labels[_]}
missing := required - provided
count(missing) > 0
msg := sprintf("Missing required labels: %v", [missing])
}
---
# templates/k8s-container-limits.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8scontainerlimits
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sContainerLimits
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
cpu:
type: string
memory:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8scontainerlimits
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.cpu
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no CPU limit", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.memory
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no memory limit", [container.name])
}
---
# templates/k8s-block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sblockprivileged
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sblockprivileged
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.initContainers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged init container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
Step 3: Apply Constraints
# constraints/require-labels.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
metadata:
name: require-team-labels
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Namespace"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
- gatekeeper-system
parameters:
labels:
- "team"
- "environment"
- "cost-center"
---
# constraints/block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
metadata:
name: block-privileged-containers
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Pod"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "DaemonSet", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
Step 4: Test Policies with conftest
# Install conftest
brew install conftest
# Test Kubernetes manifests against OPA policies locally
conftest test deployment.yaml --policy policies/ --output json
# Test Terraform against OPA policies
conftest test terraform/main.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
# Test Dockerfiles
conftest test Dockerfile --policy policies/docker/
# policies/kubernetes/deny_latest_tag.rego
package kubernetes
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
endswith(container.image, ":latest")
msg := sprintf("Container %v uses :latest tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
not contains(container.image, ":")
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
Step 5: Integrate Policy Testing in CI/CD
# .github/workflows/policy-test.yml
name: Policy Validation
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['k8s/**', 'terraform/**', 'policies/**']
jobs:
conftest:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install conftest
run: |
wget -q https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v0.50.0/conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
tar xzf conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
sudo mv conftest /usr/local/bin/
- name: Test K8s manifests
run: conftest test k8s/**/*.yaml --policy policies/kubernetes/ --output json
- name: Test Terraform
run: conftest test terraform/*.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| OPA | Open Policy Agent — general-purpose policy engine using Rego language for policy decisions |
| Rego | OPA's declarative query language for writing policy rules |
| Gatekeeper | Kubernetes-native OPA integration implementing admission control via ConstraintTemplates |
| ConstraintTemplate | CRD defining the Rego policy logic and parameters schema for a class of constraints |
| Constraint | Instance of a ConstraintTemplate with specific parameters and scope (which resources to check) |
| Admission Controller | Kubernetes component that intercepts API requests before persistence and can allow or deny them |
| conftest | CLI tool for testing structured data (YAML, JSON, HCL) against OPA policies |
Tools & Systems
- Open Policy Agent (OPA): General-purpose policy engine for unified policy enforcement
- Gatekeeper: Kubernetes admission controller built on OPA with CRD-based configuration
- conftest: Testing framework for OPA policies against configuration files
- Kyverno: Alternative Kubernetes policy engine using YAML-based policies (no Rego required)
- Styra DAS: Commercial OPA management platform with policy authoring, testing, and distribution
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Enforcing Container Security Standards Across Clusters
Context: Multiple development teams deploy to shared Kubernetes clusters. Some teams run privileged containers and images without resource limits, causing security and stability issues.
Approach:
- Deploy Gatekeeper on all clusters via GitOps (Helm chart in a FluxCD repository)
- Create ConstraintTemplates for: no privileged containers, required resource limits, required labels, no latest tag
- Start with
enforcementAction: warnto identify violations without blocking deployments - Notify teams of violations and provide a 2-week remediation window
- Switch to
enforcementAction: denyafter the remediation period - Add
excludedNamespacesfor kube-system and monitoring namespaces
Pitfalls: Deploying Gatekeeper with deny mode immediately can break existing workloads. Always start with warn mode. Overly restrictive policies without exemptions for system namespaces can prevent cluster components from functioning.
Output Format
OPA Policy Evaluation Report
==============================
Cluster: production-east
Date: 2026-02-23
Gatekeeper Version: 3.16.0
CONSTRAINT SUMMARY:
K8sRequiredLabels: 12 violations (warn)
K8sBlockPrivileged: 0 violations (deny)
K8sContainerLimits: 8 violations (deny)
K8sBlockLatestTag: 3 violations (deny)
BLOCKED DEPLOYMENTS (deny):
[K8sContainerLimits] deployment/api-server in ns/payments
- Container 'api' has no memory limit
[K8sBlockLatestTag] deployment/frontend in ns/web
- Container 'nginx' uses :latest tag
AUDIT VIOLATIONS (warn):
[K8sRequiredLabels] namespace/staging
- Missing labels: {cost-center}想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
skills/implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
- abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access
- abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc
- achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
- acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
- analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse
- analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
- analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
- analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
- analyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats
- analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples
- analyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsight
- analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence