building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system covering approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and automatic …
它会碰到什么
关于「读环境变量(配置)」:这个技能会读 process.env 之类的环境变量,但读到的都是端口、目录、超时这类配置项,没有读取密钥类变量。扫描规则原本把「读环境变量」一律算作「读凭据」,本站按变量名做了细化区分,命中明细仍如实列在下面。
逐条看命中(1 条严重或高危)
- 高
scripts/process.py:17cred-envreadDB_PATH = os.environ.get("EXCEPTION_DB_PATH", "vulnerability_exceptions.db")
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Building Vulnerability Exception Tracking System
Overview
A vulnerability exception tracking system manages cases where vulnerabilities cannot be remediated within SLA timelines. It provides structured workflows for requesting exceptions, documenting compensating controls, obtaining risk acceptance approvals, and automatically expiring exceptions when their validity period ends. This ensures organizations maintain visibility into accepted risks while complying with frameworks like PCI DSS, SOC 2, and NIST CSF.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building vulnerability exception tracking system capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with
flask,sqlalchemy,requests,jinja2 - PostgreSQL or SQLite database
- Email/Slack integration for approval notifications
- Vulnerability management platform API (DefectDojo, Qualys, Tenable)
Exception Request Workflow
Exception Categories
| Category | Description | Max Duration | Approver Level |
|----------|------------|-------------|----------------|
| Remediation Delay | Patch available but deployment blocked | 30 days | Team Lead + Security |
| No Fix Available | Vendor has not released a patch | 90 days | Security Director |
| Business Critical | System cannot be patched without outage | 60 days | VP Engineering + CISO |
| False Positive | Finding is not a real vulnerability | Permanent | Security Analyst |
| Compensating Control | Alternative mitigation in place | 180 days | Security Architect |
Required Fields for Exception Request
exception_schema = {
"cve_id": "CVE-2024-XXXX",
"finding_id": "unique-finding-reference",
"asset_hostname": "prod-db-01.corp.local",
"severity": "high",
"cvss_score": 8.1,
"category": "remediation_delay",
"justification": "Database upgrade required before patch can be applied",
"compensating_controls": [
"WAF rule blocking exploit pattern deployed",
"Network segmentation restricting access to trusted VLANs only",
"Enhanced monitoring via Splunk alert for exploitation indicators"
],
"requested_expiration": "2024-06-15",
"requestor_email": "dbadmin@company.com",
"approver_emails": ["security-lead@company.com", "ciso@company.com"],
"risk_rating": "medium",
}
Database Schema
CREATE TABLE vulnerability_exceptions (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
cve_id VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
finding_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
asset_hostname VARCHAR(255),
severity VARCHAR(20),
cvss_score DECIMAL(3,1),
category VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
justification TEXT NOT NULL,
compensating_controls TEXT,
status VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT 'pending',
requested_by VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
approved_by VARCHAR(255),
requested_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
approved_at TIMESTAMP,
expires_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
expired BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
risk_rating VARCHAR(20),
review_notes TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE TABLE exception_audit_log (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
exception_id INTEGER REFERENCES vulnerability_exceptions(id),
action VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
actor VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
details TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_status ON vulnerability_exceptions(status);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_expires ON vulnerability_exceptions(expires_at);
CREATE INDEX idx_exception_cve ON vulnerability_exceptions(cve_id);
Implementation
Exception Request API
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
from datetime import datetime, timezone
import json
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route("/api/exceptions", methods=["POST"])
def create_exception():
data = request.json
required = ["cve_id", "finding_id", "category", "justification", "expires_at", "requestor_email"]
for field in required:
if field not in data:
return jsonify({"error": f"Missing required field: {field}"}), 400
# Validate expiration does not exceed category maximum
max_days = {"remediation_delay": 30, "no_fix": 90, "business_critical": 60,
"false_positive": 365, "compensating_control": 180}
# Insert into database and notify approvers
return jsonify({"status": "pending", "id": "exc-12345"})
@app.route("/api/exceptions/<exc_id>/approve", methods=["POST"])
def approve_exception(exc_id):
approver = request.json.get("approver_email")
notes = request.json.get("notes", "")
# Update status to approved, record approver and timestamp
return jsonify({"status": "approved"})
@app.route("/api/exceptions/<exc_id>/reject", methods=["POST"])
def reject_exception(exc_id):
reviewer = request.json.get("reviewer_email")
reason = request.json.get("reason")
# Update status to rejected, record reviewer and reason
return jsonify({"status": "rejected"})
Expiration Checker (Daily Cron)
# Check for expired exceptions daily
python3 scripts/process.py --check-expirations
# Generate monthly exception report
python3 scripts/process.py --report --output exception_report.json
Compensating Controls Documentation
For each exception, compensating controls must address:
- Detection: How will exploitation attempts be detected?
- Prevention: What barriers reduce exploitation likelihood?
- Response: What incident response procedures are in place?
- Monitoring: What continuous monitoring ensures controls remain effective?
References
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
skills/building-vulnerability-exception-tracking-system/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
- abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access
- abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc
- achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
- acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
- analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse
- analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
- analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs
- analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
- analyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats
- analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples
- analyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsight
- analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence