run-an-agent-team
Design a small team of AI agents to tackle a complex task in parallel — who does what, how they hand off, and how to keep them coordinated — instead…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Run an Agent Team
Complex tasks overwhelm a single AI agent — the context gets muddy, quality drops, and it does everything serially. A small team of specialized agents, each with a focused role and clean context, can tackle it in parallel and check each other's work. This designs that team for your task: the roles, how they coordinate and hand off, what context each needs (and what to isolate), and the guardrails — turning "one agent doing everything" into a coordinated effort.
What This Skill Produces
- The task decomposition — the task broken into distinct agent roles, each with a focused responsibility (researcher, drafter, critic, integrator, etc.)
- A coordination pattern — whether agents run in parallel or sequence, how their outputs combine, and where the hand-offs are
- Context design — what each agent needs to know, and (crucially) what to keep isolated so one agent's context doesn't muddy another's (the key to why teams beat one agent)
- A review/quality step — a separate agent or pass to critique and integrate, so quality is checked, not assumed
- Guardrails — how to keep the team on track (clear objectives, defined outputs, a human checkpoint) and avoid runaway loops or drift
- A right-sized recommendation — including when a single agent is genuinely better (not everything needs a team)
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The task — the complex thing you want a team to tackle
- Your setup — the AI tool/framework you're using (Claude Code sub-agents, an agent framework, or manual multi-chat)
- The subtasks — the natural pieces, if you can see them
- Quality bar & stakes — how much the output matters (drives the review rigor)
- Constraints — cost, time, and how much human oversight you want
Framework: Decompose, Isolate, Coordinate, Review
- Check it needs a team. Not every task does — if it's simple or highly sequential with shared context, one agent is better. Use a team when parts are genuinely parallel or benefit from distinct, isolated perspectives.
- Decompose into roles. Break the task into focused responsibilities, each an agent — a researcher, a builder, a critic, an integrator — so each has one clear job.
- Isolate context deliberately. The power of a team is clean, separate context per agent — decide what each needs and what to keep apart, so perspectives stay distinct and context stays sharp.
- Choose the coordination pattern. Parallel (independent then combine), sequential (hand-offs), or a mix — and define exactly how outputs pass between agents and merge.
- Add a review pass. A separate critic/integrator step catches errors and combines the work — don't trust unreviewed parallel output.
- Guardrail it. Clear objectives, defined output formats, iteration limits, and a human checkpoint keep the team from drifting or looping.
Output Format
Agent team: task [x] · setup [y]
Needs a team? [yes — parts are parallel/benefit from isolation / no — one agent is better because Z].
Roles
| Agent | Responsibility | Context it needs / isolate |
|---|---|---|
| [researcher] | | |
| [builder] | | |
| [critic] | | |
| [integrator] | | |
Coordination: [parallel / sequential / mix] — outputs combine by [how].
Review pass: [critic/integrator checks & merges].
Guardrails: clear objectives · defined outputs · iteration limit · human checkpoint.
Quality Checks
- [ ] Checks whether a team is actually warranted (vs one agent)
- [ ] Decomposes into focused agent roles
- [ ] Deliberately designs isolated vs shared context (the key advantage)
- [ ] Defines the coordination pattern and how outputs combine
- [ ] Includes a review/integration pass
- [ ] Adds guardrails against drift and runaway loops
Anti-Patterns
- Using a team for a task one agent handles better.
- Agents with muddy, shared context (loses the whole advantage).
- No review pass — trusting unchecked parallel output.
- Vague roles that overlap and conflict.
- Missing guardrails — runaway loops or drift with no human checkpoint.
Example Trigger Phrases
- "How do I use multiple AI agents to build this?"
- "Set up an agent team to research and write this report."
- "Orchestrate several agents for this complex task."
- "Should this be one agent or a team, and how do I structure it?"
- "Design a parallel agent workflow for this."
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
exports/openclaw/run-an-agent-team/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 run-an-agent-team 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Design a small team of AI agents to tackle a complex task in parallel — who does what, how
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Design a small team of AI agents to tackle a complex task in parallel — who does what, how