report-a-hazard
Report a public hazard or code problem to the authority that can actually fix it — a pothole, broken streetlight, illegal dump, unsafe building, cod…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Report A Hazard Skill
Reporting a public problem should be simple and usually isn't: the report goes to the
wrong department, lacks the details needed to action it, or vanishes with no
reference number, so nothing happens and the reporter gives up. Councils and agencies
do fix things — they fix the reports that land in the right queue with a precise
location, evidence, and a hazard framing that raises the priority. This skill writes
that report, routes it to the channel that owns it, captures a tracking reference, and
sets up the escalation for when the first report is ignored.
What This Skill Produces
- The right channel: which department/agency owns this problem and the best way to
reach them (the official app/portal/line — many places have a dedicated
report-it system)
- A submit-ready report: precise location, what/when/how-bad, a safety framing
where genuine, and a photo checklist — the details that move it from "logged" to
"scheduled"
- A tracking plan: getting a reference number and what response time is reasonable
before chasing
- An escalation path: what to do if it's ignored or bounced — re-report with the
reference, go to the supervisor/councillor, and the safety-emergency line for
anything actually dangerous now
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The problem and exactly where it is (an address, cross-streets, a what3words/pin —
vague location is the #1 reason reports stall)
- How dangerous it is right now (a live gas smell or downed power line is an emergency,
not a report) and who's affected
- Where they are (country/area — channels are local) and whether they've reported it
before
- Any evidence they have (photos, dates, recurrence)
Framework
- Triage danger first. If it's an immediate threat to life — gas leak, live wire,
structural collapse, active flooding — that's an emergency line, not a hazard
report. The skill separates "report it" from "call emergency services now" before
anything else.
- Route to the owner. Potholes/roads, streetlights, fly-tipping, drainage,
building/code violations, environmental hazards each have a different owner (roads
authority vs council vs utility vs environmental agency). Reporting to the wrong one
is the classic dead end; identify the owner and its official report channel.
- Write the report that gets actioned. Precise location beats everything (an exact
address or pin, not "near the shops"); then what it is, how long it's been there,
how bad, who's at risk, and photos. Frame genuine safety impact honestly — a
"hazard to cyclists/children" is prioritized over a cosmetic complaint, but don't
inflate.
- Capture the reference and set the clock. Get a tracking/reference number, note
the channel's stated response time, and diarize a chase date. A report you can't
reference is a report you can't escalate.
- Escalate when ignored. If nothing happens: re-contact with the reference,
escalate to a supervisor or your local councillor ([[elected-rep-letter]]), and for
persistent public-safety issues, add visibility. Multiple neighbors reporting the
same thing raises priority — say so.
Output Format
## Is it an emergency? (check first)
[If immediate danger → the emergency line, not this. Otherwise, proceed.]
## The right channel
[Department/agency that owns it · the official report route for your area]
## Your report (submit this)
Exact location: … · What/when/severity: … · Who's at risk: … · Photos: [checklist]
## Track it
[Get a reference number · reasonable response time · when to chase]
## If it's ignored
[Re-report with reference → supervisor/councillor → visibility · neighbors reporting too]
Quality Checks
- [ ] Immediate-danger cases are diverted to emergency services before anything else
- [ ] The report is routed to the department that actually owns the problem
- [ ] The report leads with a precise, unambiguous location
- [ ] Getting and keeping a tracking reference is built in
- [ ] An escalation path exists for the ignored report
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not treat a live emergency as a routine report — triage danger first
- [ ] Do not assert a specific area's channels or response times as fact — route to the
official report system and verify
- [ ] Do not inflate severity to jump the queue — an honest safety framing works;
crying wolf burns credibility
- [ ] Do not submit without a precise location — it's the difference between fixed and filed
- [ ] Do not stop at one ignored report — the escalation is where stubborn problems get fixed
Related
[[elected-rep-letter]] and [[speak-at-the-council]] for escalation; [[permit-navigator]]
for the other side of local government; [[scam-message-decoder]] if a "pay to fix your
report" message appears.
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
exports/openclaw/report-a-hazard/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 report-a-hazard 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Summarise what Report A Hazard does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the us
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Report a public hazard or code problem to the authority that can actually fix it — a potho