跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

employee-engagement-survey

Design an employee engagement survey and analyse results. Use when asked to create an employee survey, engagement questionnaire, pulse survey, or eN…

不碰外部(只输出文字)严重 0 · 高危 1mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,6 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数1 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 1 · 中 0 · 低 0
逐条看命中(1 条严重或高危)
  • SKILL.md:7meta-hidden-unicode
    "openclaw": { "emoji": "🧑‍💼" }

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Employee Engagement Survey Skill

Designs complete employee engagement surveys and provides a framework for analysing and acting on results.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Mode — designing a new survey or analysing existing results
  • Survey type (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
  • Company name (for personalisation of question text)
  • Company size and stage (startup / scaleup / enterprise — affects question relevance)
  • Key areas of concern (optional — e.g. "we have had high attrition on the engineering team")
  • Anonymity approach — fully anonymous, team-level reporting only, or individual responses visible to HR
  • Length target (short: 5–10 questions / standard: 15–25 / comprehensive: 30+)
  • For analysis mode: survey results data (paste as table, CSV, or summary statistics)

Mode Detection

  • User provides survey results -> Analysis mode
  • User wants to create a survey -> Design mode

Design Mode

Required Inputs

  • Survey type (annual / quarterly pulse / post-onboarding / exit / specific topic)
  • Company size and stage
  • Key areas of concern (optional)
  • Anonymity approach
  • Length target (short: 5-10 / standard: 15-25 / comprehensive: 30+)

Opening Statement (always include)

"This survey is anonymous. Your responses help us understand what is working and what to improve. Results will be shared with [who] and we will communicate actions taken by [date]."

Core Questions

Overall Engagement

  1. On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend [Company] as a great place to work? (eNPS)
  2. I feel proud to work at [Company]. [1-5]
  3. I intend to still be working here in 12 months. [1-5]

Role and Clarity

  1. I understand how my work contributes to company goals. [1-5]
  2. I have the tools and resources I need to do my job. [1-5]
  3. My workload is manageable. [1-5]

Manager and Team

  1. My manager gives useful feedback. [1-5]
  2. My manager cares about my development. [1-5]
  3. I feel part of a team that works well together. [1-5]

Culture and Belonging

  1. I feel I can be myself at work. [1-5]
  2. People treat each other with respect. [1-5]
  3. [Company] lives by its stated values. [1-5]

Growth and Recognition

  1. I have opportunities to grow and develop. [1-5]
  2. My contributions are recognised. [1-5]
  3. I have had a meaningful career conversation in the last 6 months. [Yes/No]

Open questions (always include)

  • What is one thing [Company] should start doing?
  • What is one thing [Company] should stop doing?
  • Anything else to share?

Analysis Mode

Analysis Output

1. Headline Scores

| Metric | Score | Benchmark | Trend |

|---|---|---|---|

| eNPS | [-100 to +100] | Industry avg | vs last survey |

eNPS: Below 0 = Concerning / 0-30 = Good / 30-70 = Great / 70+ = Excellent

2. Strengths — Top scoring areas with evidence.

3. Improvement Areas — 3 lowest scoring areas with verbatim comment themes.

4. Action Planning Template

| Improvement area | Action | Owner | Timeline | Measure |

|---|---|---|---|---|

5. Communication Template — Draft message to share results with employees.

Output Format

  • Design Mode delivers: the question set grouped by driver (each with its response scale and the reason it earns its place), the anonymity/threshold rules stated up front, the invitation copy, and the analysis plan written before data exists — so nobody designs the analysis around the answers.
  • Analysis Mode delivers: participation and segment coverage first (with the n-below-threshold segments suppressed and said so), driver scores vs. prior wave with the deltas that clear noise flagged, verbatim themes with prevalence counts, and a "three commitments" section — because a survey that doesn't end in visible action is the fastest way to kill next year's response rate.

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Survey includes anonymity statement at the start
  • [ ] eNPS question (0-10 recommend scale) is included in all survey types
  • [ ] Open-ended questions are included (not just Likert scales)
  • [ ] Analysis includes a specific action planning template (not just observations)
  • [ ] Results communication template commits to sharing back with employees by a specific date

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not launch a survey without committing to a communication-back date — surveys with no follow-through reduce trust and depress future response rates
  • [ ] Do not use only Likert scale questions — open-text responses surface specific themes that quantitative scores cannot, and are essential for action planning
  • [ ] Do not design a comprehensive 30+ question survey as a pulse — pulse surveys that take more than 5 minutes see sharply lower completion rates
  • [ ] Do not present analysis without an action planning template — raw scores without committed actions are the most common reason engagement survey data is ignored
  • [ ] Do not segment results below teams of 5 when anonymity is promised — small-group breakdowns allow individual identification and destroy psychological safety

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Create an employee engagement survey for our team"
  • "Design a pulse survey for [topic]"
  • "Analyse these engagement survey results: [paste]"

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 employee-engagement-survey 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: