deepfake-drill
Run a tabletop drill of a voice-clone or deepfake fraud attempt — the 'CEO needs this wire today' call — against your actual approval process, befor…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Deepfake Drill Skill
The finance teams that lose seven figures to a cloned voice all describe the
same call afterwards: it sounded exactly like him, he knew the deal names, he
was stressed, it was 4:55pm on a Friday. Voice cloning needs seconds of audio
now; the defense isn't detecting the fake — assume you can't — it's a process
that holds even when the voice is perfect. This skill drills that process as a
tabletop exercise: realistic pressure, your actual approval chain, and a
debrief that fixes the gap the drill finds. It trains defenders; it does not
help attackers — no cloning instructions, no evasion tips, ever.
What This Skill Produces
- A drill scenario pack tailored to your org: the pretext, the pressure
timeline, the escalating asks — written for a facilitator to read aloud,
not for realism tooling
- A facilitator script with decision points, expected-control checkpoints,
and legitimate-looking curveballs ("the CFO is genuinely on a plane")
- A tells checklist the team keeps afterwards: process tells (urgency +
secrecy + channel-switch + authority), not audio tells
- A gap report template: which control held, which was bypassed and how,
the fix, the re-drill date
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The process being drilled: who can request payments/changes, who approves,
above what thresholds, through which channels
- The realistic attacker's knowledge: what's public about your execs, deals,
vendors (assume LinkedIn + your press page)
- Who's being drilled and whether it's announced or unannounced (recommend
announced-window: "a drill will happen this month" — trains without the
trust damage of full ambush)
- Any real near-misses to build from
Process
- Design the scenario around YOUR weakest legitimate path. The drill
pretexts that work are the ones your process half-allows: the acquisition
that's "still confidential", the vendor bank-detail change, the exec
travelling. Pick one, build the pretext from information a real attacker
could gather publicly.
- Script the pressure, not the technology. The facilitator plays the
caller using the three levers every real case uses — urgency (deadline in
minutes), secrecy (tell no one, deal sensitivity), authority (the voice/name
at the top) — plus the channel-switch ("can't do email, I'm boarding").
The script says what the caller says; it never explains how to clone a
voice, and redirect any such request.
- Let the process fail safely. Facilitator notes for each decision point:
what the control should catch, what to say if the participant bypasses it,
when to escalate the pressure once. No individual shaming — the drill
grades the process, and the debrief says so out loud.
- Debrief on tells and controls. The checklist that stays: any payment or
detail-change request combining urgency + secrecy + channel-switch gets
out-of-band verification on a known number, no exceptions for rank — the
callback rule is the whole defense. Score which controls held.
- Fix and re-drill. Every gap gets an owner, a fix, and a date; the
re-drill uses a different pretext. Recommend an annual cadence and folding
the callback rule into onboarding.
Output Format
## Drill scenario: [pretext name]
[Setup, what the attacker plausibly knows, the ask sequence, timing]
## Facilitator script
[Read-aloud beats · decision points with expected control · escalation and
curveball notes · hard stop conditions]
## The tells checklist (keep this)
[Process tells + the callback rule, one page]
## Gap report
| Control | Held / bypassed | How | Fix | Owner | Re-drill date |
## Aftercare
[The no-blame debrief framing + the announcement for the wider team]
Quality Checks
- [ ] The scenario is built from the org's own process and public information —
generic scripts don't find real gaps
- [ ] Zero content that teaches attack technique: no cloning tools, methods, or
detection-evasion — pressure is scripted as dialogue only
- [ ] The debrief framing is process-blame, not person-blame, explicitly
- [ ] The callback rule appears verbatim in the tells checklist with the
"no exceptions for rank" clause
- [ ] Every gap in the report has an owner and a re-drill date
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not produce actual cloned audio, cloning instructions, or tool
recommendations for impersonation — decline that direction plainly, even
"for realism"; the drill works as read-aloud tabletop
- [ ] Do not run fully unannounced ambush drills on individuals — announced
windows train; ambushes traumatize and get the program cancelled
- [ ] Do not let the drill conclude "train people to hear fakes" — the
defense is the callback rule, because the fakes are already good enough
- [ ] Do not skip finance-adjacent paths: payroll detail changes and vendor
bank updates are the same attack in cheaper clothes
Related
[[scam-message-decoder]] for the text/email versions; [[oncall-runbook]]
patterns for the verification procedure; [[incident-postmortem]] if drilling
because a real attempt already happened.
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
exports/openclaw/deepfake-drill/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 deepfake-drill 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Summarise what Deepfake Drill does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases the use
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Run a tabletop drill of a voice-clone or deepfake fraud attempt — the 'CEO needs this wire