creator-deal-decoder
Decode a brand deal or UGC contract before signing — usage rights, exclusivity windows, whitelisting, payment terms, and kill clauses ranked 🔴🟡🟢 …
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Creator Deal Decoder Skill
Creators sign their first brand contracts at nineteen, alone, excited, and
against a legal team. The expensive clauses are never the ones about the
deliverable — they're the quiet ones: *perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free
usage (your face in their ads forever), category exclusivity* (no other
skincare deals for 12 months, priced at one video), whitelisting (they run
ads from YOUR account), and payment net-60 with a revisions clause that makes
it net-forever. This skill decodes the document the way [[lease-decoder]]
decodes a lease: plain language, severity-ranked, money math shown — and ends
with the counter-ask email, because the first contract is a first offer.
What This Skill Produces
- A clause-by-clause decode in plain language, ranked 🔴 (can cost real
money or your channel) / 🟡 (negotiate) / 🟢 (standard)
- The money math: what the rate implies per deliverable including the
exclusivity and usage you're actually selling — the rate is never just for
the video
- A counter-ask email, polite and specific, with the 2–3 changes that
matter most and fallback positions
- A walk-away line: the clause combination that makes this deal worse
than no deal
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The contract text (paste it; decode only what's actually there)
- The creator's side: platform(s), audience size, typical rates if known,
how much they want/need this deal
- The deliverables as they understand them, and the offered fee
- Any other income this could block (existing or hoped-for deals in the
category)
Framework: the six places creator money hides
Decode every clause, but hunt these specifically:
- Usage & licensing — how long, where, and how they can use the content
(and the creator's face/name). Organic social for 90 days is normal;
perpetual, all-media, royalty-free is them buying an ad campaign for the
price of a post. Paid usage beyond the original post is a separate,
priced thing.
- Exclusivity — category, scope, duration. Price it: months of blocked
category deals × typical deal value = the real cost. A $2k deal with 12-month
skincare exclusivity can be a $10k gift to the brand.
- Whitelisting / spark ads — ads run from the creator's own handle,
spending the creator's audience trust. Separately priced, time-boxed, with
spend caps, or struck.
- Approvals & revisions — unlimited revisions is unlimited unpaid work;
cap the rounds. "Brand may reject at sole discretion" plus payment-on-
approval is a kill clause wearing a process costume.
- Payment terms — net-30 max for small creators, late fees named, deposit
for first-time partners, and payment tied to delivery, not to brand
approval or performance.
- Morality/termination clauses — one-sided termination, clawbacks on
posted content, vague "brings brand into disrepute" standards; flag the
asymmetries (can the creator terminate too?).
Output Format
## The deal in one line
[What they're actually buying for what price]
## Clause decode
| Clause (quoted) | Plain English | 🔴🟡🟢 | Why it matters here |
## The money math
[Fee vs what's being sold: deliverables + usage + exclusivity, priced out]
## The counter-ask email (ready to send)
[Warm open · the 2-3 asks with specific replacement language · fallbacks]
## Walk-away line
[The combination that makes this worse than no deal]
⚠ This is a decode, not legal advice — for deals with real money or long
exclusivity, a contract lawyer's hour is cheap insurance.
Quality Checks
- [ ] Every 🔴 quotes the actual clause text — no flags without receipts
- [ ] Exclusivity and usage are priced, not just flagged — the money math
is what turns "hm" into a counter-ask
- [ ] The counter-email asks for at most three changes, with replacement
wording the brand can literally accept
- [ ] Standard-and-fine clauses are marked 🟢 — a decode that flags
everything teaches nothing
- [ ] The not-legal-advice line is present and the lawyer threshold is
concrete (real money, long exclusivity, IP transfer)
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not decode clauses that aren't in the pasted text — "usually these
contracts also…" is labelled as a general note, never as this contract
- [ ] Do not advise signing or refusing outright — decode, price, counter;
the creator decides
- [ ] Do not write the counter-email combative — brands walk from hostile
counters and accept specific ones
- [ ] Do not let excitement discount the math; "great exposure" appears in
the money math at its actual price: $0 unless evidenced
Related
[[first-client-contract]] for freelance service contracts; [[influencer-brief]]
is the brand's side of this table; [[late-invoice-escalation]] when net-30
becomes net-never.
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
exports/openclaw/creator-deal-decoder/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 creator-deal-decoder 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Summarise what Creator Deal Decoder does in one line. Use when asked to [trigger phrases t
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Decode a brand deal or UGC contract before signing — usage rights, exclusivity windows, wh