跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

creator-deal-decoder

Decode a brand deal or UGC contract before signing — usage rights, exclusivity windows, whitelisting, payment terms, and kill clauses ranked 🔴🟡🟢 …

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,5 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Creator Deal Decoder Skill

Creators sign their first brand contracts at nineteen, alone, excited, and

against a legal team. The expensive clauses are never the ones about the

deliverable — they're the quiet ones: *perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free

usage (your face in their ads forever), category exclusivity* (no other

skincare deals for 12 months, priced at one video), whitelisting (they run

ads from YOUR account), and payment net-60 with a revisions clause that makes

it net-forever. This skill decodes the document the way [[lease-decoder]]

decodes a lease: plain language, severity-ranked, money math shown — and ends

with the counter-ask email, because the first contract is a first offer.

What This Skill Produces

  • A clause-by-clause decode in plain language, ranked 🔴 (can cost real

money or your channel) / 🟡 (negotiate) / 🟢 (standard)

  • The money math: what the rate implies per deliverable including the

exclusivity and usage you're actually selling — the rate is never just for

the video

  • A counter-ask email, polite and specific, with the 2–3 changes that

matter most and fallback positions

  • A walk-away line: the clause combination that makes this deal worse

than no deal

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

  • The contract text (paste it; decode only what's actually there)
  • The creator's side: platform(s), audience size, typical rates if known,

how much they want/need this deal

  • The deliverables as they understand them, and the offered fee
  • Any other income this could block (existing or hoped-for deals in the

category)

Framework: the six places creator money hides

Decode every clause, but hunt these specifically:

  1. Usage & licensing — how long, where, and how they can use the content

(and the creator's face/name). Organic social for 90 days is normal;

perpetual, all-media, royalty-free is them buying an ad campaign for the

price of a post. Paid usage beyond the original post is a separate,

priced thing.

  1. Exclusivity — category, scope, duration. Price it: months of blocked

category deals × typical deal value = the real cost. A $2k deal with 12-month

skincare exclusivity can be a $10k gift to the brand.

  1. Whitelisting / spark ads — ads run from the creator's own handle,

spending the creator's audience trust. Separately priced, time-boxed, with

spend caps, or struck.

  1. Approvals & revisions — unlimited revisions is unlimited unpaid work;

cap the rounds. "Brand may reject at sole discretion" plus payment-on-

approval is a kill clause wearing a process costume.

  1. Payment terms — net-30 max for small creators, late fees named, deposit

for first-time partners, and payment tied to delivery, not to brand

approval or performance.

  1. Morality/termination clauses — one-sided termination, clawbacks on

posted content, vague "brings brand into disrepute" standards; flag the

asymmetries (can the creator terminate too?).

Output Format

## The deal in one line
[What they're actually buying for what price]

## Clause decode
| Clause (quoted) | Plain English | 🔴🟡🟢 | Why it matters here |

## The money math
[Fee vs what's being sold: deliverables + usage + exclusivity, priced out]

## The counter-ask email (ready to send)
[Warm open · the 2-3 asks with specific replacement language · fallbacks]

## Walk-away line
[The combination that makes this worse than no deal]

⚠ This is a decode, not legal advice — for deals with real money or long
exclusivity, a contract lawyer's hour is cheap insurance.

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Every 🔴 quotes the actual clause text — no flags without receipts
  • [ ] Exclusivity and usage are priced, not just flagged — the money math

is what turns "hm" into a counter-ask

  • [ ] The counter-email asks for at most three changes, with replacement

wording the brand can literally accept

  • [ ] Standard-and-fine clauses are marked 🟢 — a decode that flags

everything teaches nothing

  • [ ] The not-legal-advice line is present and the lawyer threshold is

concrete (real money, long exclusivity, IP transfer)

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not decode clauses that aren't in the pasted text — "usually these

contracts also…" is labelled as a general note, never as this contract

  • [ ] Do not advise signing or refusing outright — decode, price, counter;

the creator decides

  • [ ] Do not write the counter-email combative — brands walk from hostile

counters and accept specific ones

  • [ ] Do not let excitement discount the math; "great exposure" appears in

the money math at its actual price: $0 unless evidenced

Related

[[first-client-contract]] for freelance service contracts; [[influencer-brief]]

is the brand's side of this table; [[late-invoice-escalation]] when net-30

becomes net-never.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 creator-deal-decoder 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: