traction-channel-research

Traction Channel Research

Use this skill before traction-bullseye when the agent needs evidence about

which channels might work. The job is to replace founder guesses with grounded

channel ideas.

Source Traceability

Primary source: Traction, chapters 1, 3, and 5. Authoring notes: converted

lines 238-393, 555-674, and 787-902. The canonical channel list also appears

in ../traction-bullseye/references/source-map.md.

Research Workflow

1. Define the product, target customer, business model, ACV or price point, and

current growth stage.

1. List all 19 channels, even if some look unlikely:

targeting blogs, publicity, unconventional PR, search engine marketing,

social and display ads, offline ads, search engine optimization, content

marketing, email marketing, viral marketing, engineering as marketing,

business development, sales, affiliate programs, existing platforms, trade

shows, offline events, speaking engagements, and community building.

1. For each channel, research comparable companies, adjacent markets, failed

examples, and underused tactics.

1. Separate channel from strategy. "SEO" is a channel; "comparison pages for

high-intent alternatives" is a strategy.

1. Estimate reach, cost, speed, confidence, and customer fit.
2. Shortlist the top three to five strategies for Bullseye middle-ring tests.

Evidence To Look For

• Founder interviews, teardown posts, podcasts, and launch retrospectives.
• Competitor traffic sources, ad libraries, backlink patterns, and content

footprints.

• Marketplaces, communities, events, newsletters, podcasts, and niche platforms

where the customer already gathers.

• Signs of saturation: crowded ad auctions, copied content, high affiliate

competition, or low response rates.

• Signs of underuse: unfashionable offline channels, narrow communities,

ignored partners, or new platforms.

Output Format

# Traction Channel Research

## Context
- Product:
- Customer:
- Stage:
- Traction goal:

## Channel Scan
| Channel | Strategy Idea | Evidence | Reach | Cost | Speed | Fit | Confidence |
|---------|---------------|----------|-------|------|-------|-----|------------|

## Shortlist
1. [Channel + strategy] - [why test this]
2. [Channel + strategy] - [why test this]
3. [Channel + strategy] - [why test this]
4. [Optional channel + strategy] - [why test this]
5. [Optional channel + strategy] - [why test this]

## Bias Check
- Channels the team may be overvaluing:
- Channels the team may be ignoring:

## Recommended Next Tests
[Hand off to traction-test-planner.]

Quality Bar

• Prefer specific strategies over broad channel labels.
• Include at least one uncomfortable or underused channel.
• Distinguish evidence from guesses.
• Flag channels that cannot plausibly move the user's current traction goal.