跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

seo-sxo

>

不碰外部(只输出文字)严重 3 · 高危 0hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

它会碰到什么

扫了多少5 个文本文件,35 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数3 处
命中统计严重 3 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0
逐条看命中(3 条严重或高危)
  • 严重 references/user-story-framework.md:33instruction-harmful-additive
    - Searches with added qualifiers (+ "for beginners", + "pricing") = narrowing
  • 严重 references/wireframe-templates.md:8instruction-harmful-additive
    1. **Ultra-concrete placeholders**: Not "add CTA" but "add pricing CTA with annual
  • 严重 SKILL.md:164instruction-harmful-additive
    - NOT: "Add a CTA here"

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Search Experience Optimization (SXO)

SXO bridges the gap between SEO (what Google rewards) and UX (what users need).

Traditional SEO audits check technical health. SXO asks: "Does this page deserve

to rank for this keyword based on what Google is actually rewarding in the SERP?"

Core Insight

A page can score 95/100 on technical SEO and still fail to rank because it is the

wrong page type for the keyword. If Google shows 8 product pages and 2 comparison

pages for your keyword, your blog post will never break through -- no matter how

well-optimized it is.

Commands

| Command | Purpose |

|---------|---------|

| /seo sxo <url> | Full SXO analysis (auto-detect keyword from page) |

| /seo sxo <url> <keyword> | Full SXO analysis for a specific keyword |

| /seo sxo wireframe <url> | Generate IST/SOLL wireframe with concrete placeholders |

| /seo sxo personas <url> | Persona-only scoring (skip SERP analysis) |

Execution Pipeline

Step 1: Target Acquisition

  1. Fetch the target URL via claude-seo run render_page.py <URL> --mode auto (SPA-aware and SSRF-safe)
  2. Parse with claude-seo run parse_html.py <URL> to extract: title, H1, meta description,

headings hierarchy, word count, schema markup, CTAs, media elements

  1. If no keyword provided, extract primary keyword from title tag + H1 overlap
  2. Validate keyword is non-empty before proceeding

Step 2: SERP Backwards Analysis

Read references/page-type-taxonomy.md for classification rules.

  1. Search Google for the target keyword (WebSearch)
  2. For each of the top 10 organic results, record:
  • URL and domain authority tier (brand / niche authority / unknown)
  • Page type (classify using taxonomy)
  • Content format (long-form, listicle, how-to, comparison, tool, video)
  • Word count estimate (from snippet length and page structure)
  • Schema types present (from currently supported SERP features; exclude FAQ/HowTo)
  • Media signals (video carousel, image pack, thumbnail presence)
  1. Record SERP features present:
  • Featured snippet (paragraph / list / table / video)
  • People Also Ask (extract all visible questions)
  • Ads (top and bottom -- count and analyze ad copy themes)
  • Related searches (extract all)
  • Knowledge panel / local pack / shopping results
  • AI Overview presence and source types
  1. Calculate SERP consensus:
  • Dominant page type (>60% = strong consensus, 40-60% = mixed, <40% = fragmented)
  • Content depth expectations (average word count tier)
  • Schema expectation (most common structured data types)
  • Media expectations (video required? images critical?)

Step 3: Page-Type Mismatch Detection

This is the core SXO insight. Compare target page type against SERP consensus.

Mismatch severity levels:

| Target Type | SERP Expects | Severity | Recommendation |

|-------------|-------------|----------|----------------|

| Blog Post | Product Pages | CRITICAL | Create dedicated product page |

| Blog Post | Comparison | HIGH | Restructure as comparison with matrix |

| Product | Informational | HIGH | Add educational content layer |

| Landing Page | Tool/Calculator | HIGH | Build interactive tool component |

| Service Page | Local Results | MEDIUM | Add location signals + local schema |

| Any type match | - | ALIGNED | Focus on content depth and UX |

Classification rules:

  • Classify target page using references/page-type-taxonomy.md
  • Classify each SERP result using the same taxonomy
  • Flag mismatch if target type differs from SERP dominant type
  • If SERP is fragmented (no dominant type), note opportunity for differentiation

Step 4: User Story Derivation

Read references/user-story-framework.md for the full framework.

From SERP signals, derive user stories:

  1. PAA questions reveal knowledge gaps and concerns
  2. Ad copy themes reveal commercial triggers and value propositions
  3. Related searches reveal the search journey (what comes before/after)
  4. Featured snippet format reveals the expected answer structure
  5. AI Overview reveals what Google considers the definitive answer

For each signal cluster, generate a user story:

As a [persona derived from signal],
I want to [goal derived from query intent],
because [emotional driver from ad copy / PAA tone],
but I'm blocked by [barrier derived from PAA questions / related searches].

Generate 3-5 user stories covering the primary intent angles.

Step 5: Gap Analysis

Compare the target page against SERP expectations across 7 dimensions:

| Dimension | What to Compare | Score |

|-----------|----------------|-------|

| Page Type | Target type vs SERP dominant type | 0-15 |

| Content Depth | Word count, heading depth, topic coverage | 0-15 |

| UX Signals | CTA clarity, above-fold content, mobile layout | 0-15 |

| Schema Markup | Present vs expected structured data types | 0-15 |

| Media Richness | Images, video, interactive elements vs SERP norm | 0-15 |

| Authority Signals | E-E-A-T markers, social proof, credentials | 0-15 |

| Freshness | Last updated, date signals, content recency | 0-10 |

Total: 0-100 SXO Gap Score (lower = larger gap, higher = better alignment)

Step 6: Persona-Based Scoring

Read references/persona-scoring.md for methodology.

  1. Derive 4-7 personas from SERP intent signals:
  • Cluster PAA questions by theme
  • Segment ad copy by target audience
  • Map related searches to journey stages
  1. For each persona, score the target page on 4 dimensions (25 pts each):
  • Relevance: Does the page address this persona's need?
  • Clarity: Can this persona find their answer within 10 seconds?
  • Trust: Are there adequate trust signals for this persona?
  • Action: Is there a clear next step for this persona?
  1. Output persona cards with scores and specific improvement recommendations
  2. Sort recommendations by weakest persona first (biggest opportunity)

Step 7: Wireframe Generation (Optional)

Only execute when /seo sxo wireframe is invoked.

Read references/wireframe-templates.md for templates.

  1. Generate IST (current state) wireframe from parsed page structure
  2. Generate SOLL (target state) wireframe based on:
  • SERP consensus page type
  • Gap analysis findings
  • Persona scoring weaknesses
  1. Use ultra-concrete placeholders:
  • NOT: "Add a CTA here"
  • YES: "Add pricing CTA with annual savings badge below hero, linking to /pricing#enterprise"
  1. Output as semantic HTML section outline with annotations

DataForSEO Integration

If DataForSEO credentials or optional tools are available:

  1. Before any API call, run cost estimate and confirm with user
  2. Use serp_organic_live_advanced for precise SERP data (positions, features, snippets)
  3. Use kw_data_google_ads_search_volume for search volume and competition metrics
  4. Fall back to WebSearch if DataForSEO unavailable -- note reduced precision in output

SXO Score vs SEO Health Score

The SXO score is separate from the main SEO Health Score.

  • SEO Health Score = technical compliance (crawlability, speed, schema, etc.)
  • SXO Gap Score = alignment between page and SERP expectations
  • A page can score 95 SEO + 30 SXO = technically perfect but strategically misaligned
  • Both scores should be reported together when both are available

Cross-Skill References

| Finding | Hand Off To |

|---------|-------------|

| E-E-A-T gaps in persona scoring | /seo content for deep E-E-A-T audit |

| Missing schema types | /seo schema for generation |

| Local intent detected in SERP | /seo local for GBP analysis |

| Content depth gaps | /seo page for deep page analysis |

| Technical issues found during fetch | /seo technical for full audit |

| Image/media gaps | /seo images for optimization |

Output Format

Full SXO Analysis

## SXO Analysis: [URL]
### Target Keyword: [keyword]

### 1. SERP Landscape
- Dominant page type: [type] ([confidence]% consensus)
- SERP features: [list]
- Content depth norm: [word count range]
- Schema expectation: [types]

### 2. Page-Type Alignment
- Your page type: [type]
- SERP expects: [type]
- Verdict: [ALIGNED | MISMATCH (severity)]
- Impact: [explanation]

### 3. User Stories (derived from SERP signals)
[3-5 user stories with source signals]

### 4. Gap Analysis (SXO Score: XX/100)
[7-dimension breakdown table]

### 5. Persona Scores
[4-7 persona cards with 4-dimension scores]

### 6. Priority Actions
[Ranked list: fix mismatch first, then weakest persona gaps]

### 7. Limitations
[What could not be assessed, data source notes]

Error Handling

| Error | Action |

|-------|--------|

| URL fetch fails | Report error, suggest checking URL accessibility |

| No keyword provided or detected | Ask user to provide target keyword |

| WebSearch returns <5 results | Proceed with available data, note limited sample |

| SERP has no organic results (all ads) | Note highly commercial SERP, analyze ad copy only |

| Target page is JavaScript-rendered | Note limitation, use available HTML content |

| DataForSEO cost exceeds threshold | Fall back to WebSearch, notify user |

Quality Checklist

Before delivering results, verify:

  • [ ] Target URL was fetched via claude-seo run render_page.py <URL> --mode auto (not raw curl/fetch)
  • [ ] Page type classification uses taxonomy from references
  • [ ] At least 5 SERP results were analyzed
  • [ ] User stories cite specific SERP signals as evidence
  • [ ] Persona scores include concrete improvement suggestions
  • [ ] SXO score is clearly labeled as separate from SEO Health Score
  • [ ] Limitations section is present and honest
  • [ ] Cross-skill recommendations are included where relevant

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。