跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

review

Review branch changes against Archcore docs, or report project health. Use for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', 'show status',…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,11 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

/archcore:review

Review the changes on the current branch against the .archcore/ knowledge base, in both directions: whether the changed code still matches the documents that claim it, and whether the changed documents still match the code they describe. On the default branch, or with an empty diff, the skill reports project health instead. Write affinity: experience types — cpat and task-type land through the experience track. This is also the only skill that removes a document: closeout.discharge removes a completed plan, and actualize.fix may remove a long-stale draft of any type — both via mcp__archcore__remove_document, each under its own confirmation.

Command tense: /archcore:plan declares a future canon delta, /archcore:document

records the present state — including work that shipped without a plan — and

/archcore:review reconciles a past declared delta. Δ vocabulary:

skills/_shared/delta-routing.md.

When to use

  • "Review my branch" / "Review the changes before merge" → branch review
  • "Show status" / "How many docs do we have?" → project health dashboard
  • "Are any docs out of date?" / "Check if documentation matches the code" → drift
  • "Audit the knowledge base" / "Documentation gaps?" → deep
  • Session-start staleness warning appeared → drift
  • "Close out the feature" / "Ship the feature and close it out" → closeout
  • "Capture this repeated change as a pattern" → experience

Not review:

  • Documenting a module, decision, or topic → /archcore:document
  • Planning a feature or initiative → /archcore:plan
  • First-time setup → /archcore:init

Routing table

| Signal | Route |

|---|---|

| No arguments, branch with changes | → branch review, steps 1–4 |

| On the default branch, or empty diff | → project health dashboard (step 1 fallback) |

| First word drift | → actualize track (step 3); scope from step 1 when the branch boundary resolves, all documents on on-default-branch or empty-diff |

| First word deep | → actualize track over all documents, plus coverage and relation findings |

| First word closeout | → closeout track (skills/_shared/tracks/closeout.md), scope pre-filled from the step 1 branch-state block; exits into the step 4 experience offer |

| First word experience | → experience track (skills/_shared/tracks/experience.md) over the branch scope; the detect gate selects cpat or task-type |

| Path, tag, or scope argument | → the named scope narrows or replaces the branch scope |

| Completion signals: "close out the feature", "ship the feature and close it out" — an explicit completion or acceptance verb, not mere branch readiness. A plain "review my branch" stays on branch review even for a merge-ready branch | → closeout track (skills/_shared/tracks/closeout.md), scope pre-filled from the step 1 branch-state block; exits into the step 4 experience offer |

| Any other first word — a track or type name such as actualize or cpat, or a former flag such as --drift | → topic text; route by the signals above |

On the closeout track, closeout.verify reconciles the plan's ## Declared Delta section against the branch diff and reports drift as unplanned Δ — details in skills/_shared/tracks/closeout.md.

Execution

Load skills/_shared/gate-contract.md and skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md before executing any track gate. Question budgets follow the elicitation contract.

IF .archcore/ does not exist, THEN announce initialization in one line and call mcp__archcore__init_project without asking a question. IF .archcore/ contains zero documents, THEN proceed on git and codebase grounding and report that zero documents were found.

Grounding. Search all three categories — vision, knowledge, experience — with mcp__archcore__search_documents / mcp__archcore__list_documents; never exclude a category from reads. Pass a type filter matched to the review moment — spec, rule, adr, doc, guide for claims on changed code; cpat, task-type for precedent; plan, prd, idea, rnd, and research (when skills/_shared/research-compatibility.md returned yes), plus scenario and journey (when skills/_shared/actor-subject-compatibility.md returned yes), for the closeout track's plan-and-implements-chain scope — instead of relying on the global type ranking. When a found document has implements or related relations, pull the linked documents one hop across categories.

Global sources (only when present). If any list_documents / search_documents result carries global: true / read_only: true / source_kind: "global", load skills/_shared/globals.md. Also load it when a search_documents response's coverage names a source other than "local" — even when results is empty: the empty page is exactly where that file's retry ladder applies. Never modify a global document and never add a relation to one. Exclude global documents from every local-health metric — counts, orphan detection, drift; you MAY add one separate line naming the mounted source and its document count.

Step 1: Branch scope

Resolve the branch work boundary per skills/_shared/branch-state.md — plain git, offline. On success, the branch-state output block (committed and uncommitted changes since the merge base) is the review scope. A path, tag, or scope argument narrows the changed-file list.

Handle every sentinel the contract defines:

| Sentinel | Response |

|---|---|

| no-repo | Request an explicit path or topic; review that scope without a diff. |

| detached-head | State the detached state; request an explicit path, topic, or ref. |

| no-default-branch | Request an explicit path or topic. |

| no-merge-base | Request an explicit path or topic. |

| on-default-branch | Report project health instead of a branch review. |

| empty-diff | Report project health instead of a branch review. |

In drift mode, the on-default-branch and empty-diff sentinels widen the actualize scope to all documents instead of the health fallback.

Project health fallback — compact dashboard, data only, no analysis:

  • document counts by category, by status, and by type (skip types with 0);
  • relation counts by type;
  • orphaned documents (no incoming or outgoing relations);
  • one-line issues summary (orphans, high draft count).

End with: For staleness detection, run /archcore:review drift. For a full audit, run /archcore:review deep.

Before delegating an audit, supply the resolved branch scope, scoped diff, and

relevant git history to the auditor. Identify missing history explicitly.

Before computing project-wide metrics, page through list_documents until

truncated: false, increasing offset by returned after each page. If a

truncated page returns zero documents, report an incomplete inventory.

Step 2: Bidirectional check

Over the branch scope, check both directions:

  1. Changed code versus the documents that claim it — search for documents that reference the changed paths, modules, or names; read each match with mcp__archcore__get_document; compare its claims against the changed code.
  2. Changed documents versus the code they describe — for each changed .archcore/ document, read the referenced code and compare.

Each conflict finding carries exactly one verdict: spec-wrong (the document is stale), code-wrong (the code violates a document that still stands), or ok (the pair matches on inspection). Cite the evidence — changed files, modification dates, content markers — with every non-ok verdict.

Step 3: Actualize gate

WHEN step 2 surfaces a drift signal — any spec-wrong or code-wrong finding — or the first word is deep or drift, route into the actualize track (skills/_shared/tracks/actualize.md) and run its gates: actualize.scope (pre-filled with the step 1 branch-state block), actualize.verdict, actualize.fix. In deep mode, widen the scope to all documents and report coverage gaps, relation health, status, and consistency findings alongside the drift verdicts. Verdict vocabulary lives in skills/_shared/verdict-contract.md.

Step 4: Experience offer

WHEN the reviewed changes repeat an undocumented pattern, offer a cpat or task-type capture through the experience track (skills/_shared/tracks/experience.md): experience.detect establishes the repeated edit shape and its evidence; experience.offer asks once. The offer is optional — never force it; a decline writes nothing.

Delegation

  • The archcore-auditor agent collects findings read-only: document inventory, relation graph, drift and coverage signals. The agent never questions the user (a subagent MUST NOT conduct an interview, per skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md) and never writes.
  • The main thread confirms every fix with the user and applies it via mcp__archcore__update_document, one document at a time, per the actualize.fix gate. The review skill MUST NOT edit code on this path — it reports a code-wrong finding without fixing it.

Result

  • Branch review: findings grouped by verdict — spec-wrong / code-wrong / ok — with evidence, applied fixes, and declined fixes.
  • Health fallback: the dashboard, data only.
  • Closeout: per-task verdicts, applied and declined document updates, status transitions grouped applied / declined / skipped, routed residue with the instrument that took it, and removed plans.
  • Produced documents grouped by category — experience: a cpat or task-type draft from the experience offer or from closeout residue capture; knowledge: a guide, or an adr plus its standard cascade (rule, guide), when closeout routes residue through the decision instrument; knowledge / vision: documents updated by a drift fix or a closeout merge.
  • Removed documents: each completed plan closeout removed, and each long-stale draft a drift fix removed on the user's confirmation — each named with the commit that still carries the file.
  • Name tracks and steps in plain words; do not print a gate address of the form <track>.<stage>.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 5 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 review 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: