跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

reality-check

Check whether a claimed shipped feature, repo state or goal status holds up in evidence. Use when: comparing a claim with what exists; a gap report …

联网无严重或高危命中hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

它会碰到什么

扫了多少6 个文本文件,8 KB
它会碰到什么联网
命中总数1 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 1

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Reality Check

Compare an expected state with observable evidence, measure declared goals, or

report native status. Select the requested question; a snapshot needs no

invented completion claim. Return facts and gaps without selecting work.

Claim comparison

  1. Read the exact claim and its source. For a completion claim, enumerate every

stated goal, including work that was never started. Give each a disposition:

confirmed with evidence, concrete gap or unverifiable.

  1. Inspect relevant files, command outcomes and artifacts. Separate confirmed

behavior, concrete gaps, incomplete evidence and changed assumptions. Name the

missing evidence instead of resolving an untestable claim by assertion.

  1. Compare proposed scope with the original goal when asked about a plan. Report

additions that lack authority as scope escalation; the report cannot approve

them. Repeated measurements use the same question and criteria; a changed

question starts a different comparison.

  1. Return the cited findings with checked and not-checked scope. Keep native

tracker, Git, runtime, deterministic checks and semantic judgments distinct.

A quick answer can be inline. A selected durable gap report retains

reality-check-report.v1: write reality-check-report.json under the caller's

chosen destination, default .agents/scratch/reality-check/<run-id>/, and run

skills/reality-check/scripts/validate-output.sh <report.json>. Include the

checked claim, evidence-backed finding kinds and goal-by-goal dispositions for

completion/status claims. This format permits no verdict, readiness or

PASS field; observations are not independent semantic judgment.

Goal measurement

Inspect the declared goals source; prefer GOALS.md when it and legacy YAML

both exist. Preserve directive and gate identities and report each executable

check with its actual outcome. Run the requested ao goals command once:

measure --json, validate --json, drift, history, export, meta --json,

scenarios or render.

These commands do not edit the goals source, but measure, drift and export

may write best-effort derived snapshots under .agents/ao/goals/baselines/.

render --out <file> writes a caller-selected spec; never target the goals

source or another non-derived file. Use stdout when no output file is requested.

Return command, exit code, goal-level results, aggregate measurement, missing

evidence and checked/not-checked scope. Do not add, remove, prioritize, migrate

or repair goals, or turn a measurement gap into assigned work.

Native status

Use ao status for the local evidence-store view. It validates content-addressed

intent and verdict artifacts before counting them, reports corruption or

unavailable sources, and shows evidence recency. Its durable stores are

.agents/ao/intents/sha256 and .agents/ao/verdicts/sha256; a count is not a

per-artifact digest inventory. Inspect a specific digest or timestamp only when

that artifact is part of the requested question.

Report caller-supplied subject manifests from their named location. Otherwise

mark manifests, runtime phase, elapsed execution, tool-call activity and remaining

work as not checked. An artifact's recent timestamp proves evidence recency,

not an active worker. Read other tracker, Git or factory facts only from their

own authorized source; do not blend factory completion, green checks and a

fresh verdict into one health judgment. Report unavailable evidence explicitly.

Boundary

Return the selected report or snapshot. This skill neither changes native state

nor issues semantic PASS, repairs records, schedules or retries work. The

documented goal snapshots and requested report/spec writes are its only output

side effects. A native caller pursuing an authorized outcome uses these facts

and continues its work; the reporting mode does not decide completion for it.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。