跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

contract-builder

Convert approved planning artifacts into an execution contract. Invoke when the user wants to start building, asks to move from planning to implemen…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,5 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Contract Builder

Converts planning artifacts into a single execution handshake: execution-contract.md. Load the baseline with ssf runtime asset read templates/execution-contract.md.

Read before generating: .spec-superflow.yaml (especially dp_0_decisions),

proposal.md, specs/, design.md, tasks.md, then load

docs/artifact-contract.md with ssf runtime asset read docs/artifact-contract.md.

Artifact Language

Read artifact_language=<concrete-language> from dp_0_decisions. Generate

execution-contract.md in the same language as that resolved value and the

approved planning artifacts. Preserve required schema keywords and code

identifiers verbatim; language consistency applies to explanatory prose and

headings. If the concrete artifact language is missing or still auto, route

back to workflow-start before writing the contract instead of guessing or

silently defaulting to English.

Artifact Mapping

| Source | Extract |

|--------|---------|

| proposal.md## Why + ## What Changes | Intent Lock (problem + scope) |

| proposal.md## Scope > ### Out of Scope | Scope Fence |

| specs/ → each ### Requirement: | Approved Requirements, Scenarios, Test Obligations |

| design.md## Decisions | Architecture, Interface, Dependency Constraints |

| tasks.md → numbered task groups | Execution Batches, Completion Definitions, Review Timing |

Cross-Check: Requirement Coverage

Before finalizing:

  1. List every SHALL/MUST from specs/
  2. Verify each is reflected in Approved Behavior, has a test obligation, and appears in at least one batch
  3. Flag unmapped requirements in Escalation Rules
  4. Note cross-batch dependencies

Contract Structure

Must make obvious: approved behavior, out-of-scope, constraints, batches, test obligations, review gates, and conditions that force a rewind to planning. Prefer compression over repeating planning details.

Approval Model (DP-3)

After drafting: summarize handoff rules, identify ambiguity, flag unmapped requirements, ask user to approve explicitly. After approval:

ssf state set <change-dir> dp_3_result "approved: <summary>"
ssf state set <change-dir> dp_3_timestamp now

Advance the state after approval:

ssf state transition <change-dir> bridging
ssf state transition <change-dir> approved-for-build

DP-3 is a hard gate — no implementation without this record.

Stale Contract Detection

Refresh if: scope changed in proposal, requirements changed in specs, constraints changed in design, batches changed materially in tasks, or the contract no longer matches intent.

Hotfix Mode

Generate a minimal contract only for a legacy Hotfix: Intent Lock (one sentence), Task List (numbered), Approval Gate (DP-3). Skip Scope Fence, Build Rules, Review Gates, Test Evidence. Still requires DP-3 approval. Quick direct execution and direct incident Hotfix do not invoke this skill; they use the signed receipt and finish with test_result: pass instead.

Guardrails

  • Do not continue to implementation if ambiguity remains
  • Do not approve the contract on the user's behalf
  • Do not skip the contract because planning docs look complete
  • Flag unmapped requirements; do not silently drop them

Post-Generation

Run ssf state init <change-dir> to create .spec-superflow.yaml with hashes.

For a legacy Hotfix, after writing the minimal contract, run ssf state init <change-dir> or ssf state rebuild <change-dir> so contract_hash is recorded. DP-3 remains mandatory before build.

Exception Handling

  • Parse failures: Report specific file and section. Suggest re-running spec-writer.
  • Missing files: List every missing artifact. Route back to spec-writer.
  • User interruption: Re-read all artifacts on resume; check contract staleness via content comparison.
  • Validation failure: Flag unmapped requirements in Escalation Rules and approval summary.

Standard User-Facing Handoff

End every user-facing phase report with this concise handoff. Only a successfully

persisted closing state and abandoned are terminal.

Normal report

  • Current stage: <detected workflow stage>.
  • Completed / blocker: <completed work>.
  • Next stage: <next workflow stage or skill>.
  • Entry condition: <what must be true to enter it>.

Blocked report

  • Current stage: <detected workflow stage>.
  • Completed / blocker: <blocking fact or missing evidence>.
  • Next stage: <stage that resumes after the blocker>.
  • Entry condition: <the approval, artifact, validation, or fix required>.

Approval-wait report

  • Current stage: <detected workflow stage>.
  • Completed / blocker: <work ready for the named decision>.
  • Next stage: <stage that follows approval>.
  • Entry condition: <explicit user approval or recorded decision>.

Successful terminal report

  • Current stage: successfully persisted closing or abandoned.
  • Completed / blocker: <persisted terminal outcome>.
  • Next stage: none.
  • Entry condition: no further transition exists.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。