ios-memgraph-analysis
Use when capturing or analyzing an iOS .memgraph, especially when the task mentions a memory leak, heap growth, persistent memory increase, ownershi…
它会碰到什么
逐条看命中(2 条严重或高危)
- 高
scripts/capture_sim_memgraph.py:18exec-spawnreturn subprocess.run(command, text=True, capture_output=True, check=False)
- 高
scripts/summarize_memgraph.py:56exec-spawnresult = subprocess.run(
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
iOS Memgraph Analysis
Use memory graphs to prove why memory survives a defined lifetime boundary.
Separate unreachable leaks from reachable growth, preserve raw tool output, and
verify the same app-owned type and ownership path after a fix.
Contents
- [Boundary](#boundary)
- [Evidence Model](#evidence-model)
- [Workflow](#workflow)
- [Ownership Decisions](#ownership-decisions)
- [Common Mistakes](#common-mistakes)
- [Review Checklist](#review-checklist)
- [References](#references)
Boundary
This skill owns .memgraph capture and command-line ownership/growth analysis.
Use the Memory Graph Debugger or Instruments when their interactive graph and
allocation timeline are the primary task. Use source review for a suspected
closure capture only after runtime evidence identifies the lifetime or path.
Evidence Model
Do not collapse these conditions:
- Unreachable leak: allocated memory no longer has a path from a live root.
An isolated strong cycle can be unreachable and still consume memory.
- Reachable but abandoned state: a live root still retains objects the user
flow no longer needs. leaks may correctly report zero.
- Expected cache or pool: memory survives intentionally and must be judged by
its bound, eviction behavior, and pressure response.
- Heap regression or fragmentation: footprint grows because more/larger
allocations persist or dirty pages are poorly utilized, without a leak.
Apple's leak scanner uses conservative pointer discovery and incomplete type
metadata. Counts can fluctuate, and a zero result does not prove the absence of
an ownership bug. Strong evidence identifies the expected lifetime, an
app-owned type or allocation, and a credible path or isolated reproduction.
Workflow
1. Define the lifetime before capturing
Name the object that should disappear and the event that ends its useful life.
For example: EditorViewModel should deinitialize after dismissing the editor
and completing pending save work.
Record one deterministic sequence:
- launch or restore a known state;
- take an optional baseline graph;
- perform the feature flow;
- cross the expected release boundary;
- wait for legitimate asynchronous cleanup;
- take the post-flow graph.
Keep build, simulator/device, data, Malloc Stack Logging setting, and repetition
count stable. Malloc Stack Logging adds valuable allocation backtraces but also
overhead; compare only runs with the same setting.
2. Capture a graph without guessing the process
Xcode can export a graph from the Memory Graph Debugger. For a running Simulator
app, use the helper from this skill:
mkdir -p /tmp/myapp-memory
mkdir /tmp/myapp-memory/run-01
python3 scripts/capture_sim_memgraph.py \
--bundle-id com.example.MyApp \
--output-dir /tmp/myapp-memory/run-01 \
--pretty > /tmp/myapp-memory/run-01/capture.json
The per-run mkdir must fail if the capture directory already exists. Use a
new run name rather than mixing stale evidence with a retry.
Pass --udid when more than one Simulator is booted. The helper accepts only
one exact launchd label and PID; zero or multiple matches are errors. It runs the
host leaks --outputGraph command, retains stdout/stderr, and writes a manifest.
Do not replace this with pgrep | head -1 or a substring match.
Capturing suspends the process. Do not use capture latency as performance data.
3. Preserve raw output and build a bounded summary
MEMGRAPH=$(jq -er \
'select(.status == "captured") | .memgraph | select(type == "string" and length > 0)' \
/tmp/myapp-memory/run-01/capture.json)
test -s "$MEMGRAPH"
python3 scripts/summarize_memgraph.py \
"$MEMGRAPH" \
--artifact-dir /tmp/myapp-memory/run-01/analysis-raw \
--app-image 'MyApp|MyFeatureKit' \
--trace-limit 3 --group-by-type --pretty \
> /tmp/myapp-memory/run-01/analysis.json
Read the exact graph path from the preserved capture report; do not guess a
timestamped filename. The helper creates a dedicated raw-artifact directory,
refuses to reuse it, runs leaks --list, and parses only a conservative subset
of its text. --app-image marks candidate rows; it does not prove ownership.
--trace-limit runs bounded
leaks --traceTree=<address> queries. Add --reference-tree when aggregate
root paths are more useful than individual leaked addresses. With
--group-by-type, that reference-tree query is grouped in the same invocation.
Exit statuses 0 and 1 from leaks remain analyzable; a primary status above 1
fails the summary, while optional-query failures are preserved and warned as
unusable without discarding a valid primary summary.
Apple does not publish these text formats as stable machine schemas. Treat
parse warnings as a reason to inspect the raw artifacts, not to loosen the
parser until it emits a desired answer.
4. Find the first actionable app-owned edge
Start with an app-owned leaked type or allocation stack. Inspect:
- the leak's object graph and Malloc Stack Logging backtrace, when present;
- a bounded
--traceTree=<address>for objects that reference one address; --groupByTypeto compress repeated types and reveal a retained payload;--referenceTreefor a top-down view when the responsible address is unclear;- source code for the first strong edge controlled by the app.
An unreachable self-cycle may have no live root in traceTree. Use the grouped
leak graph plus source verification or reduce the behavior to an isolated
reproduction. Never invent a root path that the graph does not contain.
5. Investigate growth when leaks is empty
Use matching baseline and post-flow graphs, locate the growing region, compare
object types, then trace a suspicious address back to an app-owned edge. The
evidence goal is persistent reachable growth across the same lifetime—not a
lower RSS value or a single large snapshot. Load
[reachable-growth.md](references/reachable-growth.md) only for this empty-leak
branch; it contains the ordered vmmap, heap, leaks, and malloc_history
queries and their logging-dependent alternatives.
6. Fix and verify the same lifetime
Prefer the narrowest ownership correction: break the unintended strong edge,
cancel work that owns the object, remove an observer, bound/evict a cache, or
release a large buffer after its last use. Use weak when the reference may
legitimately become nil; use unowned only with a proven lifetime guarantee.
Repeat the identical flow. A fix is supported when the same app-owned type/path
disappears or the pre/post growth attributable to it is removed across repeated
runs. Lower RSS, a smaller graph file, or a lower aggregate leak count alone is
not proof.
Ownership Decisions
| Evidence | Next action |
|---|---|
| App type in a root cycle | Inspect both strong edges and allocation stack. |
| No root for a leaked address | Inspect grouped cycle evidence and isolate the flow. |
| Live root retains dismissed feature state | Follow the path to the first app-owned edge. |
| Zero leaks but repeated malloc growth | Diff baseline/post heap objects. |
| Framework object dominates | Find the app-created owner, input, or call frequency. |
| Growth stabilizes at a documented bound | Test eviction/pressure behavior before changing it. |
Common Mistakes
- Declaring the app leak-free because
leaksreturned zero once. - Selecting the first PID or Simulator from an ambiguous list.
- Enabling Malloc Stack Logging in only one side of a comparison.
- Treating a parser's best-effort type column as an API guarantee.
- Pasting enormous reference trees into a report without finding an app edge.
- Fixing every closure with
[weak self]without reasoning about lifetime. - Claiming success from graph size, RSS, or total-count changes without proving the target lifetime and ownership path.
Review Checklist
- [ ] The object and expected release boundary are explicit.
- [ ] Baseline and post-flow graphs use the same build, runtime target, data
state, deterministic flow, cleanup wait, repetitions, and Malloc Stack
Logging setting.
- [ ] Simulator, bundle identifier, process label, and PID are unambiguous.
- [ ] Original graph and raw command outputs are preserved.
- [ ] Current installed-tool help confirms version-sensitive command shapes.
- [ ] Leak, reachable growth, expected cache, and fragmentation are separated.
- [ ] The finding names an app-owned type/allocation and credible path.
- [ ] Missing type metadata or conservative-scanner limits are disclosed.
- [ ] The fix changes one ownership/lifetime cause.
- [ ] Verification repeats the same flow and evidence query.
References
- [Reachable growth when
leaksis empty](references/reachable-growth.md) —
matched-graph comparison and address-to-owner workflow
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。