跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

academic-search

Search and analyze academic literature. Find papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize academic findings for research projects.

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中claude-office-skills/skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,9 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Academic Search Skill

Overview

I help you navigate academic literature, find relevant papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize findings for your research projects or literature reviews.

What I can do:

  • Formulate academic search queries
  • Recommend databases and search strategies
  • Analyze paper abstracts and summaries
  • Explain research methodologies
  • Help structure literature reviews
  • Identify research gaps

What I cannot do:

  • Access full-text papers (unless provided)
  • Execute actual database searches
  • Access paywalled journals
  • Conduct original research

How to Use Me

Step 1: Define Your Research Topic

Tell me:

  • Your research question or topic
  • Academic field/discipline
  • Scope (broad survey vs. specific topic)
  • Purpose (literature review, thesis, curiosity)

Step 2: Get Search Strategy

I'll provide:

  • Optimized search queries
  • Recommended databases
  • Key terms and synonyms
  • Search methodology

Step 3: Analyze Findings

If you share papers/abstracts, I can:

  • Summarize key findings
  • Explain methodologies
  • Identify themes and patterns
  • Help organize citations

Academic Databases

General Databases

| Database | Coverage | Access |

|----------|----------|--------|

| Google Scholar | All fields | Free |

| Semantic Scholar | AI-enhanced search | Free |

| Microsoft Academic | Computer Science focus | Free |

| Web of Science | High-impact journals | Subscription |

| Scopus | Comprehensive | Subscription |

| JSTOR | Humanities, social sciences | Subscription |

Field-Specific Databases

| Field | Database | Notes |

|-------|----------|-------|

| Medicine | PubMed, MEDLINE | Free, comprehensive |

| Computer Science | arXiv, DBLP, ACM DL | arXiv free |

| Physics | arXiv, APS Journals | arXiv free |

| Psychology | PsycINFO, PsycArticles | Subscription |

| Business | EBSCO, ProQuest | Subscription |

| Law | Westlaw, LexisNexis | Subscription |

| Engineering | IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect | Subscription |

Preprint Servers

| Server | Fields |

|--------|--------|

| arXiv | Physics, Math, CS, Biology |

| bioRxiv | Life Sciences |

| medRxiv | Medical Sciences |

| SSRN | Social Sciences |

| ChemRxiv | Chemistry |


Search Query Formulation

Boolean Operators

AND: Both terms must appear
     "machine learning" AND healthcare

OR:  Either term can appear
     "deep learning" OR "neural network"

NOT: Exclude term
     climate change NOT politics

():  Group terms
     (AI OR "artificial intelligence") AND ethics

Advanced Techniques

1. PICO Framework (Medical/Health)

P - Population/Patient
I - Intervention
C - Comparison
O - Outcome

Example: "elderly patients" AND "exercise therapy" AND "cognitive function"

2. Concept Mapping

Main Concept: Machine Learning in Education
├── Synonyms: AI, artificial intelligence, deep learning
├── Related: adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring
└── Applications: personalization, assessment, analytics

Query: ("machine learning" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "deep learning") 
       AND (education OR learning OR "tutoring system")

3. Citation Chaining

Forward citation: Who cited this paper?
Backward citation: What did this paper cite?
→ Both methods help find related work

Search Filters

| Filter | Use Case |

|--------|----------|

| Date range | Recent developments |

| Publication type | Review vs. empirical |

| Author | Expert's work |

| Journal | High-impact venues |

| Language | Specific language papers |


Paper Analysis Framework

Reading Strategy: Three-Pass Method

Pass 1: Survey (5-10 min)

  • Read title, abstract, introduction
  • Scan headings and figures
  • Read conclusion
  • Outcome: Decide if worth reading more

Pass 2: Understanding (30-60 min)

  • Read carefully but skip proofs/details
  • Note key points and questions
  • Understand figures and tables
  • Outcome: Grasp main contributions

Pass 3: Deep Dive (hours)

  • Virtually re-implement the work
  • Challenge every assumption
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Outcome: Expert-level understanding

Critical Analysis Questions

| Aspect | Questions |

|--------|-----------|

| Research Question | Is it clear? Important? Novel? |

| Methodology | Appropriate? Rigorous? Reproducible? |

| Results | Convincing? Statistically valid? |

| Limitations | Acknowledged? How severe? |

| Contribution | What's new? How significant? |


Output Format

Search Strategy Output

# Academic Search Strategy: [Topic]

**Research Question**: [Your question]
**Field**: [Discipline]
**Date**: [Date]

---

## Search Queries

### Primary Query

[Optimized query with Boolean operators]


### Alternative Queries
1. `[Broader query]`
2. `[Narrower query]`
3. `[Related angle]`

---

## Recommended Databases

| Priority | Database | Rationale |
|----------|----------|-----------|
| 1 | [Database] | [Why] |
| 2 | [Database] | [Why] |
| 3 | [Database] | [Why] |

---

## Key Terms & Synonyms

| Concept | Terms to Search |
|---------|-----------------|
| [Concept 1] | term1, term2, term3 |
| [Concept 2] | term1, term2, term3 |

---

## Search Methodology

1. Start with [database] using [query]
2. Apply filters: [filters]
3. Review first [X] results by relevance
4. Use citation chaining on key papers
5. Search [database 2] for [specific aspect]

---

## Expected Paper Types

- Foundational/Classic papers
- Recent developments (last 2-3 years)
- Review/Survey articles
- Empirical studies
- Methodology papers

---

## Quality Indicators to Look For

- [ ] Peer-reviewed venue
- [ ] Citation count appropriate for age
- [ ] Reputable authors/institutions
- [ ] Clear methodology
- [ ] Reproducible results

Literature Review Output

# Literature Review: [Topic]

**Scope**: [What's covered]
**Papers Analyzed**: [Number]
**Date**: [Date]

---

## Overview

[Summary of the research landscape]

---

## Themes

### Theme 1: [Name]
[Summary of papers in this theme]

**Key Papers**:
- [Author] ([Year]): [Key finding]
- [Author] ([Year]): [Key finding]

### Theme 2: [Name]
[Summary of papers in this theme]

---

## Methodological Approaches

| Approach | Papers Using It | Pros | Cons |
|----------|-----------------|------|------|
| [Method 1] | [X] | | |
| [Method 2] | [X] | | |

---

## Key Findings

1. [Finding 1] - supported by [papers]
2. [Finding 2] - supported by [papers]
3. [Finding 3] - supported by [papers]

---

## Research Gaps

1. [Gap 1]: [Why it matters]
2. [Gap 2]: [Why it matters]

---

## Recommendations for Future Research

1. [Direction 1]
2. [Direction 2]

---

## References

[Formatted citations]

Citation Formats

APA 7th Edition

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of article. 
Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page–Page. https://doi.org/xxxxx

IEEE

[1] A. Author and B. Author, "Title of article," Journal Name, 
vol. X, no. X, pp. XX–XX, Month Year.

Chicago

Author Last, First. "Title of Article." Journal Name Volume, 
no. Issue (Year): Page–Page.

Tips for Better Results

  1. Start with review articles to understand the landscape
  2. Use citation chaining - both forward and backward
  3. Check author profiles for related work
  4. Set up alerts for new papers on your topic
  5. Use reference managers (Zotero, Mendeley)
  6. Read abstracts first to filter efficiently
  7. Focus on recent + seminal papers

Limitations

  • Cannot access full-text papers directly
  • Cannot execute database searches
  • Knowledge has training cutoff
  • Cannot assess very recent publications
  • Cannot verify citation counts in real-time

Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。