wp-workflow

World Politics Workflow Router (wp-workflow)

The orchestrator for a World Politics submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then

send the user to the matching skill. World Politics publishes scholarship in **comparative politics and

international relations** — it is a specialist in that joint domain, not a discipline-wide generalist

(unlike APSR/AJPS/JOP) and not IR-only. The router's first job is to confirm the question **travels

across cases or systems** and sits inside the journal's scope.

When to trigger

• Starting a new World Politics paper and unsure where to begin
• Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
• Deciding between a research article and a review article
• Returning with a decision letter (route to wp-rebuttal)

First question: which article type, and is it in scope?

| Situation | Type | Route to |

|-----------|------|----------|

| Original study posing a substantive comparative/IR question | Research article (≤ 12,500 words) | normal pipeline below |

| Synthesis of thematically related books that reframes a field's agenda | Review article (usually commissioned; still triple-blind) | wp-literature-positioning + wp-theory-building |

| Opinion / policy piece, stand-alone political theory, historical or journalistic narrative | Out of scope | stop — World Politics does not publish these |

> Review articles "differ from conventional book reviews": they must **advance how a field should

> pursue future work**, not just summarize books. They are usually commissioned — confirm before

> investing (待核实).

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit & scope?              → wp-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?  → wp-literature-positioning
What's the argument that travels?→ wp-theory-building
Is the design defensible?        → wp-research-design
Are the analyses sound?          → wp-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?          → wp-tables-figures
Does it read across cases?       → wp-writing-style
Dataverse & transparency?        → wp-transparency-and-data-policy
How will it be judged?           → wp-review-process
Ready to submit?                 → wp-submission
Got an R&R / decision?           → wp-rebuttal

Default order

`topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis →

tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data-policy → review-process → submission → rebuttal`

Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.

Anti-patterns

• Treating World Politics like a generalist venue (APSR/AJPS/JOP) — the contribution must sit in

comparative politics or IR and speak across cases

• Treating it like an IR-only journal — comparative-politics questions are equally central
• Submitting an opinion/policy piece, stand-alone political theory, or a historical/journalistic

narrative (explicitly out of scope)

• Pitching an unsolicited review article without checking the commissioning norm

Venue-routing calibration (where a paper belongs)

Before dispatching internally, sanity-check that World Politics is the right home. It is a leading

peer-reviewed journal of comparative politics and international relations — theory-driven work on the

political economy of development, regime change, conflict and security, and institutions, using

comparative, quantitative, qualitative, and formal methods, and known for analytical review essays.

| Symptom | Likely better home | Re-route signal |

|---------|--------------------|-----------------|

| IR institutions / political economy, narrow | International Organization | Route there if the audience is IR-only |

| General-interest, any subfield | APSR / AJPS / Journal of Politics | Discipline-wide reach, not comparative-IR specialist |

| Comparative breadth, lighter theory | Comparative Political Studies | If the theoretical question is not big enough |

| Travels across cases, big theoretical question | World Politics | Stay; run the pipeline below |

If a neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, say so before investing in the pipeline.

Router pass for World Politics

Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political mechanism, case scope, evidence warrant, and comparative or international implication; then test whether the manuscript addresses comparative and international politics reviewers who expect a big political question, credible evidence, and theory that travels beyond one case.

• Primary move: Run the pack as fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
• Decision ledger: return claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
• Sibling comparison: compare against International Organization for IR institutions/political economy, Journal of Politics for wider political science, Comparative Political Studies for comparative breadth; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
• Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Type】research article / review article
【In scope?】comparative or IR, travels across cases? [Y/N]
【Route to】wp-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

• [../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — comparative + IR data and software by method
• [../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official World Politics URLs behind every fact in this pack