wp-tables-figures
Use when building tables and figures for a World Politics manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and placed correctly relative to th…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Tables & Figures (wp-tables-figures)
Exhibits are where an expert reviewer checks whether a cross-case result is real. At World Politics
tables, figures, and appendixes are excluded from the 12,500-word count — but **online
supplementary material cannot exceed fifteen pages**, so you cannot dump everything into an appendix.
Every exhibit must pull its weight and reproduce from the deposited Dataverse package.
When to trigger
- Designing the main results table/figure or a key descriptive/comparative exhibit
- Deciding what belongs in the article vs. the (≤ 15-page) online supplement
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or non-self-contained
- Visualizing cross-national variation, durations, or comparative-historical sequence
Principles
- Self-contained. A reader should understand each exhibit from its title, axis/column labels, and
note alone. State units, the cases/sample, N, time span, data source (e.g., V-Dem, COW), and what
the estimate is.
- Figures over dense tables for effects. Coefficient/forest plots, marginal-effects and
predicted-probability plots, event-study and RD plots, and survival curves communicate magnitude
and uncertainty better than a wall of coefficients. Show intervals.
- Accessible. Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk, no 3D. Reviewers and
readers must parse it quickly.
- Main text vs. online supplement. Keep the few exhibits that carry the argument in the article;
move balance tables, full specifications, and robustness grids to the **online supplement (≤ 15
pages)** — used judiciously for material central to the argument, not as an overflow dump.
- Reproducible. Each exhibit is generated by the master script; numbers match the deposited
World Politics Dataverse package exactly.
Comparative + IR exhibits
- Maps for cross-national/spatial variation; network diagrams for alliances, trade, or diffusion.
- Survival/hazard plots for regime duration or conflict onset; event-study plots for shocks.
- For comparative-historical work: timelines, causal-process diagrams, and evidence tables linking
each claim to its source (documents, interviews) — these double as qualitative transparency.
- QCA truth tables / set-relation plots where the design is set-theoretic.
Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of
body-vs-supplement drift). Full map: [execution-with-mcp](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). World Politics is comparative/IR with a strong qualitative tradition; apply the chain below to its quantitative-causal lane and say so when work is case-based.
- Tables:
etable(multi-model columns) ordid_summary_to_latexstraight from the
result_id.
- Figures:
plot_from_result/enhanced_event_study_plot/event_study_table—
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.
- Every note names the estimator + clustering and states the effect size in
interpretable units.
See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).
Anti-patterns
- Tables that require the prose to be intelligible (not self-contained)
- Reporting significance stars with no effect size or interval
- Treating the ≤ 15-page supplement as an unlimited dumping ground (it is capped)
- Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for colorblind readers
- Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited code output
Exhibit-objection patterns and the venue-specific fix
A World Politics referee uses exhibits to check whether a cross-case result is real, so objections
track magnitude, transparency, and travel.
| Referee objection | The fix this skill drives |
|-------------------|----------------------------|
| "Table needs the prose to be read" | Make it self-contained: units, cases/sample, N, span, source in title and note |
| "Process-tracing claim not auditable" | Add an evidence table linking each claim to its document/interview source |
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A hypothetical study of alliance reliability and deterrence has one dense 14-column regression
table. The redesign carries the argument better:
Before: 14-column coefficient table + stars, no case labels
After: forest plot across 6 variants, 95% intervals, N = 1,940 dyad-years, COW + ATOP
Supplement: full table + balance checks → Online Appendix (within 15-page cap)
The figure shows magnitude and uncertainty at a glance while the full table stays auditable in the
supplement. (Numbers illustrative; verify the cap on the submission page.)
Exhibit pass for World Politics
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political mechanism, case scope, evidence warrant, and comparative or international implication; then test whether the manuscript addresses comparative and international politics reviewers who expect a big political question, credible evidence, and theory that travels beyond one case.
- Primary move: For every table or figure, state the object, sample/case base, uncertainty display, and one sentence the exhibit proves for this venue.
- Decision ledger: return
claim / evidence / blocker / next editrows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly. - Sibling comparison: compare against International Organization for IR institutions/political economy, Journal of Politics for wider political science, Comparative Political Studies for comparative breadth; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open
resources/official-source-map.mdfor volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
Output format
【Main exhibit】what it shows + why a figure/table
【Self-contained?】title + labels + note + N/units/cases/source present? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】grayscale-legible + colorblind-safe? [Y/N]
【Article vs supplement】split decided; supplement ≤ 15 pages respected? [Y/N]
【Reproducible?】generated by master script, matches Dataverse package? [Y/N]
【Next】wp-writing-style
Supplementary resources
- [
../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting/mapping/network/survival packages and QCA tools - [
../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word-count exclusions and the 15-page supplement cap
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-tables-figures/SKILL.md