poq-submission

Submission Preflight (poq-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne Manuscripts. POQ is double-blind, so the

single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript — and the second is a missing or

incomplete Appendix A: Disclosure Elements. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before

relying on them.

When to trigger

• "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
• Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects
• Confirming the type's word cap is met and the manuscript is properly anonymized and disclosed

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

• Publisher / affiliate: Oxford University Press / American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).
• Portal: ScholarOne Manuscripts (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poq).
• Review model: double-blind — anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page.
• Submission types & caps (text + notes; exclude figures, tables, references, appendices):

Original Article ≤ 6,500; Research Note < 3,000; Polls in Context ≤ 2,500; Research

Synthesis ≤ 6,500 (incl. notes); Book Review ~1,200.

• AAPOR disclosure: Appendix A: Disclosure Elements for all data reported (funding, exact

wording, population, sample design, mode + dates, response rate per AAPOR definitions, sample sizes +

precision, clustering/weighting design effects).

• Data policy: replication package to POQ's Harvard Dataverse; Data Availability Statement

in the endmatter; materials archived before typesetting.

• Fee: no submission fee stated (consistent as of 2026-06-22); any open-access APC handled by OUP

after acceptance — re-verify current charges on the OUP page before submission (待核实).

Preflight checklist

Type & length

• [ ] Type chosen and its word cap met (Article ≤ 6,500 / Note < 3,000 / Polls ≤ 2,500 — text + notes)
• [ ] Abstract present and within the current requirement (待核实 on exact cap)
• [ ] Footnotes/endnotes counted toward the cap; long methods moved to appendices (excluded)

AAPOR disclosure (the POQ-specific gate)

• [ ] Appendix A: Disclosure Elements present and complete for every dataset
• [ ] Response rate stated with AAPOR Standard Definition + calculation
• [ ] Sample design, mode, dates, sample sizes, precision, weighting/clustering documented

Anonymity (double-blind)

• [ ] No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
• [ ] No obvious self-references; self-citations neutralized
• [ ] Identifying file metadata stripped (document properties, comments)
• [ ] Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file

Data & files

• [ ] Replication package staged for POQ's Dataverse (reproduces every table/figure)
• [ ] Data Availability Statement drafted for the endmatter
• [ ] Ethics / IRB / human-subjects compliance addressed
• [ ] Figures/tables self-contained and accessible (see poq-tables-figures)

How the editorial office reads your upload

Think of the ScholarOne package as being screened in this order, and stage files so each check

passes on the first look:

1. Anonymity sweep — the anonymized main document is opened first. A name in the running

header, an "as we showed (Author 2023)" self-citation, or author initials in tracked-changes

metadata sends the package back before any editor reads the abstract. Export a fresh PDF/DOCX

and check File → Properties, not just the visible text.

1. Type-and-cap check — the declared submission type is compared against the word count you

enter. Count text + notes yourself before upload; an Article-length manuscript declared as a

Research Note is returned, not silently retyped.

1. Disclosure scan — the office looks for Appendix A by name. Label it exactly "Appendix A:

Disclosure Elements," one block per dataset, response-rate formula named (e.g., AAPOR RR3), so a

screener can verify completeness without reading the methods section.

1. Endmatter — Data Availability Statement present, Dataverse plan stated, IRB noted. Missing

endmatter is the most common cause of a revise-before-review email.

A package that survives all four screens goes to the editor with no round-trip — often saving two

weeks of calendar time before first decision.

Anti-patterns

• Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-blind)
• A missing or incomplete Appendix A; a response rate with no AAPOR definition
• Sending a long paper to the Research Note or Polls in Context track
• Counting figures/tables against the cap (they are excluded) while ignoring footnotes (they count)
• Budgeting for a submission fee that is not charged (verify)

Output format

【Type】Article / Note / Polls in Context / Synthesis / Book Review (cap met? Y/N)
【Appendix A】complete + AAPOR response rate calculation? [Y/N]
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Word count】within cap (text + notes)?
【Repro package + DAS】staged for POQ Dataverse + DAS drafted? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → poq-rebuttal on R&R

Supplementary resources

• [../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling
• [../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official POQ URLs behind every fact in this pack