phg-tables-figures

Conceptual Exhibits (phg-tables-figures)

PiHG is a review and theory journal, so its figures and tables are conceptual, not empirical. You

are not plotting results (there are none); you are giving the reader a map of the argument — a

typology that organizes a field, a framework diagram that shows how your concept links literatures, a

genealogy that periodizes a concept, or a synthesis table that adjudicates camps. A good exhibit **does

synthetic work**; a decorative one wastes a scarce slot in a short essay.

When to trigger

• Deciding whether an exhibit earns its place in an ~8,000-word essay
• Turning a complex synthesis into a single legible figure or table
• A reviewer said a section is "hard to follow" or "the framework is unclear"
• Building the one diagram readers will screenshot and reuse

Exhibit types that do work in a review

| Exhibit | What it does | Use when |

|---------|--------------|----------|

| Typology / matrix | Organizes a field along 2 dimensions (approach × dimension) | Camps differ on more than one axis |

| Framework diagram | Shows how your concept links literatures/relations | The argument is relational and hard to hold in prose |

| Concept genealogy / timeline | Periodizes how a concept changed | The essay narrates a conceptual history |

| Synthesis / comparison table | Adjudicates camps on shared criteria | Readers need the camps side by side |

| Agenda table | Lays out the forward questions by sub-field | The contribution is a program (phg-contribution-framing) |

If an exhibit only lists what the prose already says, cut it. Every exhibit should let the reader

see a relationship faster than the text can tell it.

Design for synthesis, not decoration

• The exhibit carries an argument, not ornament — a reader should grasp your re-ordering from the

figure alone. Give it a claim-bearing caption ("A relational typology of platform labor," not "Overview").

• Two dimensions, not ten. A typology with too many axes is a spreadsheet; pick the two that matter.
• Name the cells' logic. A 2×2 must have a reason each quadrant exists, and ideally an under-populated

cell that reveals a silence (phg-critical-intervention).

• No data dressed as concept. Do not import bibliometric counts or a VOSviewer map as if it were the

argument; if you show one, it is evidence of the field's shape, clearly labeled as such.

Craft and accessibility

• Legible in grayscale and colorblind-safe; PiHG figures are often read in print/PDF.
• Vector formats (PDF/EPS/SVG) for diagrams and tables-as-figures; avoid low-resolution raster.
• Self-contained: readable without the surrounding paragraph; define any coined term in the caption.
• Count toward the essay's economy — a review is short; one or two strong exhibits beat five weak ones.

The "reuse test"

The best PiHG exhibit is the typology or framework other scholars cite and redraw. Ask: would a

reader teaching this field put your figure on a slide? If it only restates your prose, it will not travel —

and it is not earning its slot.

Checklist

• [ ] Each exhibit does synthetic work the prose cannot do as fast
• [ ] Claim-bearing caption; readable without the surrounding text
• [ ] Typologies use the two axes that matter; cell logic is explicit
• [ ] Any empirical/bibliometric graphic is labeled as field-evidence, not the argument
• [ ] Grayscale-legible, colorblind-safe, vector format
• [ ] Exhibit count is disciplined for a short review

Anti-patterns

• A figure that only restates the prose (decoration in a scarce slot)
• Over-dimensioned typologies that read as spreadsheets
• Importing a data/bibliometric chart and passing it off as the conceptual contribution
• Captions that label ("Framework") instead of claiming ("A relational framework linking control and precarity")
• Low-resolution or color-only figures that fail in grayscale/print

Output format

【Exhibit】typology / framework diagram / genealogy / synthesis table / agenda table
【Work it does】the relationship it lets the reader see
【Caption claim】the one-line argument the exhibit makes
【Reuse test】would a teacher put it on a slide? [Y/N]
【Accessibility】grayscale + colorblind-safe + vector? [Y/N]
【Next】phg-writing-style

Supplementary resources

• [../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — diagramming and bibliometric-mapping tools (draw.io, VOSviewer, biblioshiny)
• [../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md](../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md) — the "circuit" concept as a candidate framework diagram