跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

jeg-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a project is a first-order economic-growth question that fits the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) — a specialist Springer…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,5 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Topic Selection (jeg-topic-selection)

When to trigger

  • Before committing months to a project you hope to send to JEG
  • When unsure whether your question is "growth enough" for a specialist outlet
  • When a referee or colleague has said the paper "isn't really about growth"

The JEG scope gate

JEG publishes theoretical and empirical research in economic growth and dynamic macroeconomics. A paper fits when the dependent phenomenon is long-run growth, development, or the dynamics that drive them, not when growth is a side outcome. In-scope cores include:

  • Neoclassical and endogenous growth (R&D, ideas, increasing returns)
  • Human capital accumulation, education, and skill formation
  • Fertility, the demographic transition, and unified growth theory
  • Trade and growth; financial development and growth
  • Migration, technological change, and structural transformation
  • The political economy of growth and institutions; OLG models

Calibrate ambition to a specialist (not general-interest) outlet

JEG does not require a paper to interest all of economics, but it does demand a first-order growth question answered with either real theoretical novelty or credible empirics. Ask:

  • Is the question about a growth mechanism, not a within-field micro estimate that merely mentions growth?
  • Does it speak to a live debate in the growth literature (e.g., the sources of cross-country income differences, the demographic transition, the institutions-vs-geography-vs-human-capital triangle)?
  • Theory papers: is there a new mechanism, a more general result, or a resolution of a tension in existing growth models — not a marginal parameterization?
  • Empirical papers: is the variation informative about a growth-relevant causal channel, and is the sample (often cross-country or long-run panel) suited to the claim?

Decision aids

  • Could the abstract's main sentence start "We show that [growth/development outcome] is driven by..."? If not, the growth content may be incidental.
  • Is the natural home a field growth/development outlet rather than a general-interest top-5? JEG sits precisely in that specialist slot — lean into the growth mechanism.

Anti-patterns

  • Pitching a labor/finance/IO paper that touches GDP as a "growth" paper.
  • A theory paper that re-derives a known steady state with a cosmetic tweak.
  • A cross-country regression with no defensible growth mechanism behind the correlation.
  • Assuming general-interest novelty is required — it is not; growth-field first-order-ness is.

Borderline-fit triage

| Candidate project | Verdict | Why |

|---|---|---|

| Microcredit RCT with household-income effects | wrong venue | short-run, partial-equilibrium; no growth mechanism at stake |

| Historical plough adoption → gender norms → development | strong fit | deep determinant with a cultural-transmission mechanism |

| Schooling reform and 30-year regional growth | reframe | fits if the human-capital-to-growth channel is the object, not the reform |

| Optimal capital-tax dynamics in an OLG model | fit | dynamic-macro core, provided transition implications lead |

| Firm-level productivity dispersion in one sector | wrong venue | aggregate growth content incidental to the question |

Worked vignette — stress-testing a deep-determinants idea

Idea: "Regions with historical irrigation agriculture developed more hierarchical institutions and grow slower today." Gate checks (illustrative): the dependent phenomenon is comparative development — pass. Live debate — joins the geography-versus-institutions exchange — pass. Mechanism — the chain irrigation → coordination demands → state centralization → modern factor allocation must be evidenced, not narrated; plan intermediate-outcome data now. Feasibility — requires geocoded historical agronomy data plus a credible plan for Conley inference and an exclusion-restriction defense before the first regression is run. Verdict: strong fit conditional on the mechanism evidence — schedule that evidence as a main exhibit from day one, or the project decays into another unpublishable long-run correlation.

Output format

【Question】one sentence (growth/dynamic-macro phenomenon as the object)
【In-scope core】endogenous growth / human capital / fertility / trade / institutions / ...
【Paper type】theory / empirical / quantitative
【First-order?】yes/no + the debate it joins
【Verdict】strong fit / reframe / wrong venue
【Next skill】jeg-literature-positioning

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。