跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

imfer-workflow

Use when deciding which imfer-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an IMF Economic Review …

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,7 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

IMFER Workflow Router (imfer-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you **which imfer- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at IMF Economic Review (IMFER) — the International Monetary Fund's flagship scholarly journal, published by Palgrave Macmillan / Springer Nature for the IMF, and the successor to IMF Staff Papers. IMFER's center of gravity is international macroeconomics and finance with strong policy relevance: exchange rates and capital flows, global imbalances, financial crises and contagion, sovereign debt, monetary and fiscal policy in open economies, IMF-program-relevant questions, and international spillovers. A distinctive pipeline is the Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference (ARC), whose papers often appear as IMFER special issues.

Operational tells you are at IMFER and not a sibling or generic field journal: the audience is part academic, part policy/institutional — a referee reads as both a frontier researcher and someone who could brief an IMF mission; review is double-blind (anonymize the main file); house style is the Chicago Manual of Style with American spelling; the abstract is italicized and JEL codes are required. Editor-in-chief as of 2026: Jesús Fernández-Villaverde (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Re-verify volatile specifics on the Springer Nature IMFER pages.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" on an IMFER-bound paper
  • A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed (fit, design, theory, evidence, exhibits, style, submission)
  • Work is ping-ponging between identification, the model, robustness, and the policy framing
  • An IMFER decision letter arrived and the user must switch into revision mode
  • The team is weighing IMFER against JIE, JIMF, JMCB, or Economic Policy

Routing table

| Current symptom | Next skill |

|-----------------|------------|

| Question feels narrow / not clearly international-macro with policy relevance | imfer-topic-selection |

| Contribution vs. JIE / JIMF / the IMF research frontier is fuzzy | imfer-literature-positioning |

| Cross-country causal design or policy-surprise identification is shaky | imfer-identification |

| The open-economy model / mechanism is loose or disconnected from the data | imfer-theory-model |

| Results may be specification-, sample-, or country-composition-sensitive | imfer-robustness |

| Exhibits are dense; significance asterisks still present; country coverage opaque | imfer-tables-figures |

| Prose buries the policy implication; abstract/intro do not land for a mixed audience | imfer-writing-style |

| Data, restricted IMF/central-bank paths, and code need packaging | imfer-replication-package |

| Likely objections should be war-gamed before submission | imfer-referee-strategy |

| Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight | imfer-submission |

| An R&R arrived; need a response-letter strategy | imfer-rebuttal |

Default order

  1. imfer-topic-selection — lock the international-macro question with a policy hook
  2. imfer-literature-positioning — stake the contribution vs. JIE/JIMF and the IMF frontier
  3. imfer-identification — cross-country / high-frequency / crisis-event identification
  4. imfer-theory-model — open-economy model that disciplines or interprets the estimate
  5. imfer-robustness — specification, sample, and country-composition stability
  6. imfer-tables-figures — exhibits with transparent country coverage, no asterisks
  7. imfer-writing-style — make the idea land for the dual academic/policy audience (intro last)
  8. imfer-replication-package — assemble the data/code package with restricted-data paths
  9. imfer-referee-strategy — anticipate the dual-referee objections
  10. imfer-submission — Editorial Manager double-blind preflight
  11. imfer-rebuttal — after the R&R

> imfer-writing-style is a late polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification, the model, and robustness settle.

Routing by paper archetype

IMFER spans several international-macro branches; the binding constraint differs by archetype.

| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |

|-----------|-------------------------|----------|

| cross-country panel (capital flows, debt, crises) | country composition + spillover identification | imfer-identificationimfer-robustness |

| high-frequency policy-surprise (monetary/FX, spillovers) | clean surprise series + exclusion | imfer-identification |

| open-economy DSGE / international-finance model | parameter identification + counterfactual validity | imfer-theory-modelimfer-identification |

| crisis event study / narrative | event windows + confounding macro shocks | imfer-identificationimfer-robustness |

| ARC / special-issue invited paper | sharpening the policy contribution to the issue theme | imfer-topic-selectionimfer-literature-positioning |

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My cross-country panel shows capital-flow controls dampen crisis risk, but a referee says the result is driven by a handful of Asian economies and the controls are endogenous to the crisis." That is two distinct IMFER pushbacks — country-composition fragility (owned by imfer-robustness) and policy endogeneity (owned by imfer-identification). Route to identification first to defend the design, then to robustness to show the effect survives dropping the Asian bloc; only once the coefficient is stable do you return to imfer-tables-figures and imfer-rebuttal.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating IMFER like JIE (pure international trade/finance theory-and-empirics, less policy framing) or JIMF (broader, faster, less selective)
  • Polishing prose before identification, the model, and robustness are stable
  • Letting the online appendix carry a claim the main text must establish
  • Forgetting the policy "so what" — a clean estimate with no IMF-relevant implication reads as the wrong journal
  • Leaving author-identifying traces in a double-blind main file

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:          -> imfer-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:                -> imfer-submission
elif anticipating_referees:          -> imfer-referee-strategy
elif data_code_packaging:            -> imfer-replication-package
elif exhibits_or_significance:       -> imfer-tables-figures
elif results_fragile:                -> imfer-robustness
elif model_loose:                    -> imfer-theory-model
elif identification_shaky:           -> imfer-identification
elif claim_or_positioning_fuzzy:     -> imfer-contribution / imfer-literature-positioning
else:                                -> imfer-topic-selection

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。