icml-topic-selection
Use when deciding whether a manuscript fits ICML, choosing the main research track versus the ICML Position Papers track or another venue (NeurIPS, …
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
ICML Topic Selection
Use this before committing to ICML. ICML rewards original, rigorous machine-learning research of
significant interest to the ML community. It is not the best route for every AI application or
position argument.
Strong fit
- A core ML method, theory, optimization, probabilistic model, RL algorithm, evaluation method,
systems contribution, or trustworthy-ML result.
- A use-inspired paper where the ML technique, evaluation, or insight is itself important to the ML
community.
- A theory paper with clear assumptions and meaningful implications.
- An empirical study that improves how ML is evaluated, reproduced, scaled, or understood.
- A paper that can show soundness, originality, significance, clarity, and reproducibility within
ICML's format.
Weak fit
- A domain deployment with little ML novelty.
- A benchmark win without mechanism or fair baselines.
- A position or argument paper better suited to the ICML Position Papers track.
- A replication, survey, dataset report, or engineering system better matched to another venue.
- A paper that needs more than appendices or supplement to make the main contribution intelligible.
Routing decisions
- Main-track ICML: rigorous ML contribution with strong evidence.
- Position Papers: thesis-driven argument about the field rather than a standard research result.
- NeurIPS/ICLR/AISTATS/UAI/COLT/MLSys: choose based on theory, representation learning, statistics,
uncertainty, learning theory, or systems emphasis.
- TMLR/JMLR: choose for journal-style depth, long revision cycles, or results needing more space.
Fit-versus-reroute table
| Manuscript shape | ICML verdict | Better route if not ICML |
| --- | --- | --- |
| New method with theory plus tuned benchmarks | Strong main-track fit | - |
| Pure learning-theory result, no experiments | Fits if significant | COLT for theory depth |
| Field-level argument or call for rigor | Reroute | ICML Position Papers track |
| Application with little ML novelty | Weak | Domain venue or applied track |
| Long result needing more than 8 pages | Reconsider | TMLR or JMLR |
Worked vignette: where does the optimizer paper go
A new adaptive-step method has a non-convex convergence theorem and deep-learning benchmarks. This is
a textbook ICML main-track fit because the ML mechanism, the rate, and the empirical gain are all of
broad interest. If the same authors instead wrote an essay arguing the community over-relies on
adaptive methods, that belongs in the Position Papers track, which uses a separate call and
OpenReview site; check the current year's CFP for both tracks before deciding.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low
[Recommended route] ICML main / ICML position / workshop / another conference / journal
[Contribution type] method / theory / evaluation / systems / trustworthy ML / application-driven / position
[Why ICML] <one sentence>
[Upgrade needed] <evidence, framing, related work, artifacts, impact, or reroute>想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
ICML-Skills/skills/icml-topic-selection/SKILL.md