跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

icassp-submission

Use when auditing an ICASSP submission before the CMS portal deadline — the IEEE 4+1 page format, the single-blind rule that the author list must ap…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,5 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

ICASSP Submission

Run this audit against the live ICASSP paper kit on the current-year CMS portal

(cmsworkshops.com/ICASSP<year>/papers.php), not against memory. ICASSP reissues its kit each

cycle, and because the whole review pipeline assumes a uniform IEEE two-column object, the

format is checked mechanically at upload. The next major gate as of 2026-07-09 is the **ICASSP

2027 full-paper deadline, reported ~16 September 2026** — verify on the live 2027 call.

The format contract: 4 + 1

An ICASSP regular paper is 4 pages of technical content — text, figures, and references all

count — with an optional 5th page that may hold only references, funding acknowledgements,

and the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement. Consequences to internalize:

  • There is no reviewed appendix or supplement that decides acceptance. Whatever a reviewer

must see to accept the paper lives on the four content pages.

  • References compete with content on pages 1-4 unless they spill to page 5; plan the reference

budget early.

  • Use the official IEEE two-column template from the paper kit with fonts, margins, and column

measure untouched, and confirm the PDF passes IEEE PDF eXpress before the portal will

accept it.

Single-blind: the inverted anonymity rule

ICASSP review is single-blind. Unlike OpenReview or ISCA venues, you **must include the

author list and affiliations** in the submitted PDF; reviewers see who you are, you do not see

them. The failure mode here is the opposite of an identity leak:

  • A missing or wrong author block is the defect to catch, not a self-citation.
  • Write self-citations in normal first person ("in our earlier work [4]"); no anonymization

gymnastics are needed.

  • Acknowledgements and funding are allowed and belong on page 5, not hidden.

Portal and metadata (CMS, not CMT)

  • Submission is through Conference Management Services (CMS) at cmsworkshops.com, not

Microsoft CMT and not OpenReview — a genuine ICASSP fingerprint.

  • Choose the EDICS subject category that routes the paper to the correct technical committee;

the routing decision comes from icassp-topic-selection, not from whoever uploads.

  • The CMS abstract must match the PDF abstract; it is what area organizers read.
  • No single author may appear on more than 9 papers in a cycle — check co-author load early.
  • Answer the dual-submission attestation honestly: the same work may not be under review at

another conference or journal simultaneously.

Desk-reject and triage table

| Trigger | Severity at ICASSP | Repair window |

|---|---|---|

| Fifth page carrying content beyond references/acks/ethics | Desk reject | None after deadline |

| Template tampering caught by PDF eXpress | Desk reject | None |

| Missing author list (single-blind requires it) | Non-compliant submission | Only before deadline |

| Missing Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement | Compliance flag | Only before deadline |

| Author on more than 9 papers | Enforced cap | Withdraw one before deadline |

| Dual submission to another venue | Integrity violation | None |

Final 72 hours, in order

  1. Rebuild the PDF from a clean clone; confirm the paper-kit template version is current and

PDF eXpress passes.

  1. Confirm the author block, affiliations, and page-5 acknowledgements/ethics statement are

present and correct — the single-blind checklist.

  1. Verify every figure is legible at print resolution and no float pushes past four pages.
  2. Set EDICS and the CMS abstract to match the PDF; declare all co-authors and their conflicts.
  3. Upload, download what CMS stored, and read that file end to end.

Track choice before you submit

  • Standard track — 4+1 pages, TPC review, proceedings in IEEE Xplore.
  • OJSP-ICASSP — 8+1 pages, reviewed by the Open Journal of Signal Processing board, open-access

publication, presented but not in the proceedings (earlier pre-registration deadline).

  • SPS-journal presentation — present a recently accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed,

not in proceedings.

Confirm each track's separate deadline in the current call; see icassp-workflow.

Output format

[Submission verdict] ready / fixable / not ready
[Format] 4+1 compliance, template integrity, PDF eXpress result
[Single-blind] author list present, affiliations, page-5 acks/ethics
[Metadata] EDICS, abstract match, author list, dual-submission answer, 9-paper cap
[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-presentation / grand-challenge
[Blockers] <ordered list>

Currency note

The 4+1 format, single-blind policy, CMS portal, and 9-paper cap were checked 2026-07-09 against

ICASSP 2026 (Barcelona) renderings (see ../../resources/official-source-map.md). Every value is

cycle-specific; the ICASSP 2027 Toronto cycle publishes its own kit and calendar — re-open it.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。