跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

diabetologia

Use when targeting Diabetologia or deciding whether a diabetes clinical, epidemiological, or basic/translational study fits this venue. Encodes the …

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,8 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Diabetologia (diabetologia)

Journal positioning

Diabetologia is the flagship journal of the European Association for the Study of

Diabetes (EASD), publishing **diabetes-focused research across the full evidence

spectrum** — clinical and pragmatic trials, epidemiology and population science, and

basic/translational science of islet biology, insulin action, complications, and

metabolism. Unlike a broad endocrine journal, Diabetologia is diabetes-dedicated and

explicitly welcomes rigorous basic and mechanistic science (beta-cell biology, insulin

signaling, animal/cell models) alongside human clinical and epidemiologic work. Its

defining expectation is a **significant advance in understanding, preventing, treating,

or explaining diabetes and its complications**, not a small descriptive series or an

association study with no mechanistic or clinical payoff. This skill is a **fit /

venue-selection / re-framing** aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not

replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the

live Diabetologia author instructions.

When to trigger

  • The author names Diabetologia for a diabetes clinical, epidemiological, or basic/translational

study and wants a fit/framing check.

  • A diabetes study must be re-framed around a mechanism, a prevention/treatment question, or

a complications-outcome question.

  • The author is choosing between Diabetologia (diabetes-specific, incl. basic science), JCEM

(broad endocrine), and The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (high-impact trials).

  • The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and basic/animal-study

expectations for diabetes research.

Scope & topic fit

  • Type 1 and type 2 diabetes: pathogenesis, prevention, glucose-lowering therapy, and

management trials.

  • Diabetes epidemiology and population science: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes across

cohorts.

  • Islet and beta-cell biology, insulin secretion and action, and metabolic mechanism in cells

and animal models.

  • Diabetic complications: nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease in

diabetes, with mechanism or outcome rigor.

  • Gestational diabetes, monogenic diabetes, and metabolic phenotyping studies.
  • Diabetes biomarkers, genetics/genomics, and -omics with disease relevance and validation.

Method & evidence bar

  • Clinical studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered diabetes

endpoints; trials require prospective registration and the registration number.

  • The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE

for observational/epidemiologic work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, ARRIVE for animal studies.

  • Basic/translational work needs rigorous controls, biological replication, validated

reagents/models, and blinded/randomized animal experiments where applicable.

  • Mechanistic claims require perturbation evidence and, where feasible, anchoring to human

islets, tissue, or cohorts; glucose/insulin-clamp and metabolic methods must be described.

  • Epidemiologic claims must address confounding, bias, and generalizability; causal language

must match the design.

  • Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures.

Structure & house style

  • EASD/Springer format with a structured abstract (aims/hypothesis, methods, results,

conclusions) and a research-in-context/significance statement; re-check current article

types and limits on the live guide.

  • The introduction frames the diabetes-biology or clinical gap; the discussion states the

mechanistic or practice implication and bounds overreach.

  • A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA flow diagram is expected for the relevant clinical design; animal

work reports ARRIVE-aligned detail.

  • Figures show representative data with statistics, N, and replication; an electronic

supplement carries full methods, the protocol/SAP, and additional experiments.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and

../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and EASD/Springer

anchors, then cite the current Diabetologia page you checked.

  • Search the live site for "Diabetologia EASD instructions for authors" and follow the

current version.

  • Re-check article types, abstract structure and research-in-context format, and

word/figure/reference limits.

  • Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE),

data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.

  • Re-check IRB/ethics and consent, animal-care/IACUC approval, ICMJE authorship and

conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.

  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions

win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • [ ] The study delivers a clear diabetes mechanism, prevention/treatment, or complications advance.
  • [ ] Clinical diabetes endpoints are prespecified and powered; trials are registered with the number in the manuscript.
  • [ ] The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE) is completed and attached.
  • [ ] Basic/translational work shows controls, replication, model validation, and human anchoring.
  • [ ] Epidemiologic claims address confounding and generalizability; causal language matches the design.
  • [ ] IRB/consent, IACUC (if animal), ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Small descriptive diabetes series or registry slice with no mechanism and no clinical payoff.
  • Association-only biomarker/-omics studies with no validation cohort or functional follow-up.
  • Animal/cell diabetes work without human relevance, replication, or ARRIVE-aligned rigor.
  • Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
  • Broad endocrine scope diluting the diabetes focus, better placed in a generalist endocrine venue.

Re-routing decision

  • Broad endocrine (thyroid/adrenal/bone/reproductive) beyond diabetes → journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism.
  • High-impact diabetes/endocrine trial with broad reach → the-lancet-diabetes-and-endocrinology.
  • Diabetic kidney disease centered on nephrology mechanism/outcomes → journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology / kidney-international.
  • Obstetric/gestational-diabetes pregnancy outcomes → american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology.
  • Broad practice-changing diabetes trial → general medicine (jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Diabetologia (EASD)
[Specialty tags] <T1D / T2D / islet biology / complications / epidemiology + clinical/basic>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / animal-ARRIVE>
[Method/evidence] <power, mechanism, controls/replication, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / IACUC / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。