跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

critical-care-medicine

Use when targeting Critical Care Medicine or deciding whether an intensive/critical-care study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's ICU-focused fi…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,8 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Critical Care Medicine (critical-care-medicine)

Journal positioning

Critical Care Medicine is the flagship journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine

(SCCM), publishing clinical and translational research centered on the **care of the

critically ill across the whole ICU** — sepsis, ARDS, resuscitation, shock, multiorgan

failure and organ support, and the systems and processes of critical-care delivery. Its

defining expectation is a **clinically important advance in intensive-care management or

critical-illness mechanism that informs how clinicians care for ICU patients**, not a

narrow single-center series with no outcome relevance or a basic experiment without

critical-illness anchoring. Unlike the broader pulmonary/critical-care flagship,

Critical Care Medicine is ICU-discipline-focused and spans the whole critically ill

patient, not just the lung. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid;

it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current

instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live Critical Care Medicine

author instructions.

When to trigger

  • The author names Critical Care Medicine for an ICU, sepsis, resuscitation, or organ-support

study and wants a fit/framing check.

  • A critical-care study must be re-framed around an intensive-care management question or a

critical-illness mechanism with outcome relevance.

  • The author is choosing between Critical Care Medicine, AJRCCM (broader respiratory +

critical care), and The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

  • The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and ICU-trial/quality

expectations.

Scope & topic fit

  • Sepsis and septic shock: resuscitation, antimicrobial timing, hemodynamics, and outcome

studies.

  • ARDS and acute respiratory failure: ventilation strategy, oxygenation, and rescue therapies

in the ICU context.

  • Resuscitation and shock: fluids, vasopressors, cardiac arrest, and post-resuscitation care.
  • Organ support and multiorgan failure: renal replacement, ECMO, nutrition, and sedation/

delirium management.

  • ICU systems, quality, staffing, and process-of-care and outcomes research, including

long-term/post-ICU outcomes.

  • Translational critical-illness science (immunology, endothelial/coagulation biology) anchored

to critically ill patients or relevant models.

Method & evidence bar

  • Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered ICU endpoints

(mortality, organ-failure-free or ventilator-free days, functional outcome); surrogate

physiologic endpoints need justification.

  • The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE

for observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, ARRIVE for animal studies.

  • Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are

expected, and pragmatic/cluster designs need appropriate analysis.

  • Observational ICU analyses must address confounding by indication, immortal-time and

selection bias, and missing data; causal language must match the design.

  • Translational claims need controls and replication and must anchor to critically ill

patients or validated models.

  • Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures.

Structure & house style

  • SCCM format with a structured abstract and a key-points/clinical-relevance statement;

re-check current article types (Clinical Investigation, etc.) and limits on the live guide.

  • The introduction frames the ICU clinical gap; the discussion states the management

implication and bounds generalizability to ICU practice.

  • A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA flow diagram is expected for the relevant design; animal work

reports ARRIVE-aligned detail.

  • Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries

the protocol, full statistical methods, and additional analyses.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and

../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and SCCM anchors,

then cite the current Critical Care Medicine page you checked.

  • Search the live site for "Critical Care Medicine SCCM instructions for authors" and follow

the current version.

  • Re-check article types, abstract and key-points format, and word/figure/reference limits.
  • Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE),

data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.

  • Re-check IRB/ethics and consent (including waived/deferred consent for emergency research),

animal-care/IACUC approval, ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding,

and AI-use disclosure.

  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions

win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • [ ] The study delivers a clinically important ICU-management advance or a critical-illness mechanism with outcome relevance.
  • [ ] ICU endpoints are prespecified and powered; trials are registered with the number in the manuscript.
  • [ ] The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE) is completed and attached.
  • [ ] Observational analyses address confounding by indication, immortal-time/selection bias, and missing data.
  • [ ] Translational claims are anchored to critically ill patients or validated models with controls.
  • [ ] IRB/consent (incl. deferred consent), IACUC (if animal), ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Single-center descriptive ICU series with no outcome relevance and limited generalizability.
  • Observational analyses with confounding by indication or immortal-time bias and overstated causal claims.
  • Surrogate physiologic endpoints presented as clinically definitive without patient outcomes.
  • Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
  • Lung-biology-dominant or purely respiratory-mechanism work better placed in a broader respiratory venue.

Re-routing decision

  • Pulmonary biology / respiratory-mechanism dominant over ICU management → american-journal-of-respiratory-and-critical-care-medicine.
  • High-impact respiratory/critical-care trial with broad reach → the-lancet-respiratory-medicine.
  • Perioperative critical care, sedation, or anesthesia-led ICU work → anesthesiology.
  • ICU AKI / renal-replacement centered on nephrology → journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology / kidney-international.
  • Broad practice-changing critical-care trial → general medicine (jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)
[Specialty tags] <sepsis / ARDS / resuscitation / organ support / ICU systems>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / animal-ARRIVE>
[Method/evidence] <power, ICU endpoint, confounding control, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / consent (deferred) / ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。