跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

crim-tables-figures

Use when building tables and figures for a Criminology (ASC / Wiley) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and communicate crime pa…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,7 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Tables & Figures (crim-tables-figures)

Exhibits are where an expert reviewer checks whether the crime result is real. Criminology has its own

signature figures — the age–crime curve, trajectory-group plots, survival curves, and crime maps — and

each must earn its place and stand on its own.

When to trigger

  • Designing the main results table/figure or a key descriptive exhibit
  • Deciding what belongs in the article vs. an online appendix/supplement
  • A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or non-self-contained
  • Presenting a trajectory model, survival analysis, or spatial pattern

Principles

  1. Self-contained. A reader should understand each exhibit from its title, axis/column labels, and

note alone. State the crime measure, units (counts vs. rates per 100k), sample, N, and time window.

  1. Figures over dense tables for effects. Coefficient/forest plots, predicted counts/rate-ratio

plots, and marginal-effects plots beat a wall of coefficients. Always show intervals.

  1. Show the curve, not just the coefficient. Age–crime curves, trajectory-group plots (with group

shares and CIs), and Kaplan–Meier / cumulative-incidence recidivism curves communicate the

criminological story directly.

  1. Maps when place is the point. Hot-spot / kernel-density / choropleth maps for spatial variation;

label the unit (block, tract, agency) and the rate denominator; avoid misleading raw-count maps.

  1. Accessible. Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk or 3D. Reviewers parse fast.
  2. Reproducible. Each exhibit is generated by the master script; numbers match the deposited package

exactly (see crim-data-and-transparency).

Criminology-specific exhibits

  • Trajectory plots: show group shares, posterior-probability summary, and CIs — not just mean lines.
  • Survival/recidivism: report at-risk counts, censoring, and competing risks where relevant.
  • For qualitative work: timelines, life-history charts, evidence tables linking claims to sources.

Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)

Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of

body-vs-supplement drift). Full map: [execution-with-mcp](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). Criminology is observational — place/person panels where selection is pervasive; foreground DiD/IV/RDD and the selection objection.

  • Tables: etable (multi-model columns) or did_summary_to_latex straight from the

result_id.

  • Figures: plot_from_result / enhanced_event_study_plot / event_study_table

axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.

  • Every note names the estimator + clustering and states the effect size in

interpretable units.

See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).

Anti-patterns

  • Maps or tables of raw crime counts where rates are needed (population not held constant)
  • Trajectory plots that hide group shares or classification quality
  • Reporting significance stars with no effect size or interval
  • Cramming every robustness check into the main text instead of a supplement
  • Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited code output

Exhibit choice for the signature crime objects (decision table)

Each criminology figure carries a known probe; pick the exhibit that answers it.

| Criminological object | Exhibit | The probe it must survive |

|-----------------------|---------|---------------------------|

| Age–crime curve | line plot, offending rate by age | rate denominator, cohort vs. period |

| Developmental paths | trajectory plot w/ group shares + CIs | groups reified? AvePP shown? |

| Recidivism timing | Kaplan–Meier / cumulative incidence | censoring and competing risks shown? |

| Spatial concentration | hot-spot / choropleth, rate-based | raw counts masquerading as risk? |

| Treatment effect | coefficient/forest plot w/ intervals | uncertainty visible, not stars? |

Worked micro-example: fixing a misleading hot-spot map (illustrative)

A draft maps raw burglary counts and the downtown tract glows red. A referee reads it as a risk claim

it does not support — downtown has 5x the nighttime population (illustrative). The fix: switch to a rate

per 1,000 ambient population, use a colorblind-safe sequential palette, label the unit and denominator

in the note, and move the raw-count version to the supplement. Now the exhibit shows concentration of

risk, the object the routine-activity argument claims.

Exhibit pass for Criminology

Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the crime/justice process, measurement validity, research design, and policy consequence; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: criminology reviewers who expect theory-linked crime, justice, or harm mechanisms plus transparent measurement.

  • Do the pass: For every table or figure, state the estimand or object, sample or case base, uncertainty display, and one sentence the exhibit proves for the venue audience.
  • Return a ledger: give claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
  • Sibling guard: compare against Justice Quarterly for applied justice, Journal of Quantitative Criminology for methods focus, Social Problems for broader sociological framing; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
  • Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.

Output format

【Main exhibit】what it shows + why a figure/table/map
【Crime metric】counts vs. rates + denominator stated? [Y/N]
【Self-contained?】title + labels + note + N/units/time present? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】grayscale-legible + colorblind-safe? [Y/N]
【Main text vs supplement】split decided
【Reproducible?】generated by master script, matches package? [Y/N]
【Next】crim-writing-style

Supplementary resources

  • [../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting, mapping, trajectory, and survival packages
  • [../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — formatting and double-spacing expectations

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。