corl-camera-ready

CoRL Camera-Ready

Acceptance converts the paper from a review object into a permanent PMLR record —

alongside, at CoRL, the public release of its reviews and rebuttal. The

camera-ready pass is therefore three jobs: absorb what the review process

demanded, de-anonymize cleanly, and stand up the external artifact surface that

the proceedings pipeline cannot host. The 2026 rules below were read from

corl.org author instructions on 2026-07-08; the deadline was October 12, 2026,

23:59 AoE.

What changes at camera-ready (2026 cycle)

| Dimension | Submission | Camera-ready |

|---|---|---|

| Main-text pages | 8 (Limitations included) | 9 — the added page exists to accommodate review feedback |

| Template mode | anonymous review mode | \usepackage[final]{corl_2026} |

| Identity | double-anonymous | authors, affiliations, acknowledgments restored |

| Appendix | same PDF, optional | included at the end of the camera-ready PDF, not a separate file |

| Video | supplementary upload (≤ 250 MB) | not accepted by PMLR — host externally, link from the main text / project page |

| Audience | reviewers + AC | permanent open-access record, reviews attached |

Spend the ninth page on the reviewers' record

The extra page is explicitly tied to review feedback, and your reviews will be

published next to the paper — so the highest-value use is closing the loop

visibly:

1. Reread reviews, rebuttal, and any AC comment; list every commitment you made

("we will add the 5-seed table," "we will scope the claim to tasks A–B").

1. Land each commitment in the body and note where — future readers will be

able to diff your promises against the PDF.

1. Typical allocations that pay off: the rebuttal's new results table graduated

into §5; an expanded Limitations section; the evaluation-protocol detail

reviewers had to ask for.

1. Resist scope creep: camera-ready is not a second submission. New claims that

were never reviewed do not belong in the archival version.

De-anonymization sweep

• Restore the author block, affiliations, funding acknowledgments, and any

personnel thanks (acknowledgments remain outside the page count).

• Reverse the review-time distancing: "the authors of [12]" becomes "our prior

work [12]" where that is the honest phrasing.

• Swap anonymized artifact mirrors for the permanent public URLs — and only

after those URLs exist and are populated (corl-artifact-evaluation).

• Scrub leftover review scaffolding: line numbers, draft watermarks, margin

notes, \anonymize{} macros, and the anonymous-repo README inside your ZIPs.

The external artifact surface (the PMLR no-video rule)

Because PMLR will not carry video — the field's core evidence medium — every

accepted CoRL paper effectively ships a project page. Build it to archival

standards before the PDF freezes:

• De-anonymized overview video (now free of the 250 MB review cap) plus the

uncut per-task evaluation clips that back your tables.

• Code, checkpoints, and dataset links with the tier declarations from

corl-artifact-evaluation; DOI-stamped archives for anything citable.

• Print durable URLs in the paper — a lab-server link that dies in three years

takes your evidence with it; prefer organization-level or archival hosting.

# Final-PDF gate, run on the actual upload candidate
grep -c 'usepackage\[final\]{corl_2026}' main.tex          # exactly 1
pdftotext final.pdf - | head -40                            # author block present & correct
pdftotext final.pdf - | grep -nEi 'anonym|under review|paper #' # expect no hits
pdfinfo final.pdf | grep -i pages                           # 9pp body + refs + appendix merged
pdftotext final.pdf - | grep -oE 'https?://[^ ]+' | sort -u # every URL: live, permanent, deliberate

PMLR metadata discipline

• The proceedings entry (title, author order, affiliations) is generated from

what you submit to the camera-ready pipeline; a typo here propagates to

citation indexes for good. Reconcile against every coauthor's preferred name

form in writing before upload.

• Expect the PMLR publication year to postdate the conference for some volumes

(see corl-related-work on the year-offset trap) — your own paper may be

cited with either year; you cannot control it, but your project page can

display the canonical BibTeX.

• The CoRL 2026 volume number was not yet assigned at verification time

(待核实); recent anchors are v270 (2024) and v305 (2025).

Registration, presentation, and the November venue

• CoRL 2026 runs November 9–12 at the JW Marriott in Austin, Texas (workshop day

November 9). Registration and presentation obligations for accepted papers —

who must register, in-person requirements, poster/talk formats — were not

verified in this pack (待核实): read the acceptance email and the year-site's

attendance pages as controlling.

• Plan the presentation assets against the public record: your poster and talk

will be delivered to an audience that can read your reviews.

Exit checklist

[ ] All rebuttal commitments landed and locatable in the PDF
[ ] 9-page body; Limitations expanded, not amputated
[ ] [final] template mode; identity restored; scaffolding scrubbed
[ ] Appendix merged at end of the single PDF
[ ] Project page live: video, code, data, canonical BibTeX
[ ] Every printed URL durable and populated
[ ] Coauthor sign-off on names/affiliations/order, in writing
[ ] Uploaded before Oct 12 23:59 AoE (2026); confirmation archived
[ ] Registration/attendance obligations confirmed from the acceptance
    email [待核实 in this pack]

Camera-ready mechanics are re-issued with each cycle's acceptance emails and at

https://www.corl.org/contributions/instruction-for-authors — that text, not this

snapshot, controls.