跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

bjps-workflow

Use as the entry point for any British Journal of Political Science (BJPS / BJPolS) manuscript. Routes to the right BJPS sub-skill based on lifecycl…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,5 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

BJPS Workflow Router (bjps-workflow)

The orchestrator for a British Journal of Political Science submission. Figure out the stage and the

format, then send the user to the matching skill. BJPS is a **broad, internationally-oriented

general** political-science journal (Cambridge University Press) that covers every subfield and

methodology — the router's first job is to confirm the paper has wide interest and is pitched

beyond a single subfield or national case.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new BJPS paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding which of the three formats fits the paper
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to bjps-rebuttal)

First question: which format?

| Situation | Format | Route to |

|-----------|--------|----------|

| Full original study, broad interest | Research Article (~10,000 words; 待核实 exact cap) | normal pipeline below |

| One crisp, focused contribution | Letter (short article, ~4,000 words; 待核实) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |

| Critique / correction of a published BJPS piece | Comment | bjps-literature-positioning + bjps-research-design |

> A Letter is not a half-finished Article — it is a complete, decisive contribution at short length.

> Do not pad a Letter into an Article, or starve an Article into a Letter.

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit?                      → bjps-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?  → bjps-literature-positioning
What's the argument?             → bjps-theory-building
Is the design defensible?        → bjps-research-design
Are the analyses sound?          → bjps-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?          → bjps-tables-figures
Does it read for the field?      → bjps-writing-style
Replication data & transparency? → bjps-transparency-and-data
How will it be judged?           → bjps-review-process
Ready to submit?                 → bjps-submission
Got an R&R / decision?           → bjps-rebuttal

Default order

`topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis →

tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data → review-process → submission → rebuttal`

Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.

Wide-interest routing check

Before selecting the next skill, force a one-minute BJPS fit check:

| Check | Pass condition | Route if weak |

|-------|----------------|---------------|

| Interest | A scholar outside the author's subfield (or country specialism) can state why the question matters to political science generally. | bjps-topic-selection |

| Format | The manuscript clearly fits Research Article, Letter, or Comment. | format table above |

| Method pluralism | The method is defended on its own terms, not forced into a quantitative template; BJPS spans formal, quant, qual, and interpretive work. | bjps-research-design |

| Transparency | Replication data/code (or a qualitative-transparency / restricted-access plan) is mapped to the BJPolS Dataverse expectation. | bjps-transparency-and-data |

If the paper fails the interest check, do not route to writing-style. It needs a theory or fit repair —

BJPS reviewers reject competent single-country or single-subfield studies that never make a claim of

general political-science interest.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating BJPS like a national or subfield outlet — the contribution must travel beyond one case or specialism
  • Forcing a quantitative template onto qualitative, formal, or interpretive work (BJPS judges each on its own terms)
  • Confusing BJPS with its US generalist siblings (APSR, AJPS) or specialists (CPS, World Politics) — see README
  • Deferring the replication package to acceptance — assemble it as you analyze

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Format】Research Article / Letter / Comment
【Route to】bjps-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

  • [../../resources/external_tools.md](../../resources/external_tools.md) — political-science data + software by method
  • [../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official BJPS URLs behind every fact in this pack

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。