跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

automatica

Use when targeting Automatica or deciding whether a systems-and-control manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the methodological-br…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,7 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Automatica (automatica)

Journal positioning

Automatica is the IFAC-affiliated flagship journal of systems and control,

publishing rigorous, methodologically developed contributions across control,

estimation, identification, optimization, and the analysis of dynamical systems.

The defining expectation is a method with theoretical guarantees — stability,

convergence, optimality, robustness — developed with enough breadth and depth to

constitute an archival advance, not a single narrow result. Compared with its

sibling ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control, Automatica leans toward fuller

methodological development and breadth, whereas TAC also carries sharp short

Technical Notes; route by the form and length of the main result. Application

papers that tune a known controller, and simulation studies with no

generalizable guarantee, are a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection

/ re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author

guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Automatica author information.

When to trigger

  • The author names Automatica for a control, estimation, identification, or

systems-theory manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.

  • A contribution must be re-framed from "we solved this instance" into a method

with stated guarantees and developed generality.

  • The author is choosing between Automatica and ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control

by the form and length of the result, or between a full paper and a brief paper.

  • The author needs Automatica's methodological-rigor bar and a re-routing path for

application-heavy work.

Scope & topic fit

  • Control synthesis and analysis: nonlinear, robust, adaptive, optimal,

predictive, and geometric control, developed as a general method.

  • Estimation, filtering, and system identification with consistency, convergence,

or error guarantees.

  • Networked, distributed, multi-agent, hybrid/switched, and event-triggered systems;

consensus and distributed optimization with proofs.

  • Optimization for control, game-theoretic control, and learning-based control when

the result carries rigorous stability/convergence/regret guarantees.

  • Stochastic systems and control; data-driven control with provable properties.

Method & evidence bar

  • The central object is a method backed by theorems with correct, complete

proofs under clearly stated, non-vacuous assumptions; breadth of applicability is valued.

  • Assumptions must be reasonable and explicitly discussed; a guarantee that holds

only under assumptions presupposing the conclusion is not a contribution.

  • Numerical examples illustrate and stress-test the method; they support but never

substitute for the proofs.

  • The development should be fuller than a single lemma: motivate the method, prove

its properties, and discuss its scope and limitations.

  • Position precisely against the closest prior methods — weaker assumptions, wider

system class, tighter bounds, constructive vs. existence, improved computation.

  • Notation standard and consistent; the problem formulation mathematically precise

before any result is stated.

Structure & house style

  • Standard journal article in the systems-and-control style; Automatica publishes

full papers and shorter Brief Papers — match the article type to the scope and

re-check current definitions and length policy on the live guide.

  • The introduction frames the open methodological problem and the gap, then states

the contribution; it is not an application survey.

  • Main results are numbered theorems/propositions/lemmas with proofs (in-text or

appendix per current format); a clear method statement precedes the analysis.

  • Figures are used purposefully — block diagrams, convergence/phase plots — and the

paper rests on its theorems, not its simulations.

  • Keep the example section proportionate to the theoretical development.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and

../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Elsevier anchors, then

cite the current Automatica author-information page you checked.

  • Search the live site for "Automatica guide for authors" and follow the current

Elsevier/Editorial Manager version.

  • Re-check article types (regular paper vs. Brief Paper), length limits, and the

Automatica/Elsevier manuscript format.

  • Confirm reproducibility/data/code expectations for any numerical results.
  • Re-check competing-interests, funding, author-contribution (CRediT), and AI-use

disclosure requirements, and open-access options.

  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official

instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • [ ] The contribution is a method with explicit guarantees and developed generality — not one solved instance.
  • [ ] Every main result has a complete, correct proof under non-vacuous, discussed assumptions.
  • [ ] Novelty is pinned to specific prior methods (weaker assumptions / wider class / tighter bound / better computation).
  • [ ] The methodological development is fuller than a single short note; scope and limitations are discussed.
  • [ ] The problem formulation is mathematically precise before any result is stated.
  • [ ] Article type (regular vs. Brief Paper) matches the scope and length fits current limits.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Application/tuning paper: a known method applied to one system with no general guarantee.
  • Simulation-only "validation" with no theorem, or a theorem whose assumptions assume the result.
  • Incremental extension with no weakening of assumptions or broadening of the system class.
  • Incorrect, incomplete, or hand-waved proofs; inconsistent or undefined notation.
  • Scope mismatch: a signal-processing, pure-optimization, or machine-learning paper with control as a label.

Re-routing decision

  • Rigorous theory better suited to a short Technical Note, or sharp single theorem → ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control.
  • Signal-processing estimation/detection as the core → ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing.
  • Robotics planning/control as the central contribution → ieee-transactions-on-robotics / the-international-journal-of-robotics-research.
  • Industrial-application control with hardware as the contribution → ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics.
  • Optimization theory with no control object → a dedicated optimization venue.

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Automatica
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest control subtopics>
[Contribution type] method-with-guarantee / analysis result / identification-estimation method
[Method/evidence] <does the result clear Automatica's breadth + proof-rigor bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Regular paper / Brief Paper
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / format / data-code / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。