aaag-writing-style

Writing Style (aaag-writing-style)

The Annals reaches the whole discipline of geography across four areas. The prose must make a

specialist contribution legible to geographers outside the subfield, follow **Chicago Manual of Style

(author-date)**, and fit a cap that counts almost everything (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).

When to trigger

• Drafting the introduction, framing the contribution, or final language polish
• Cutting to the word cap, or fixing citation/keyword/format issues
• A reviewer said the paper is "hard to follow," "jargon-heavy," or "reads as [another discipline]"

House style (verify on the Style Sheet)

• Chicago Manual of Style, author-date citations and reference list.
• Abstract followed by 3-5 keywords, alphabetized and italicized at the end of the abstract.
• **Word cap: ≤ 11,000 words for Articles, including abstract, references, notes, tables, and figure

captions** — budget the whole document, not just the body. Forums and Commentaries differ (see

aaag-submission).

• US/standard academic English; define area-specific jargon for a general-geography reader.

The introduction arc (make it read as geography)

Aim for: **question → geographic stake (space/place/scale/environment-society) → why it is hard →

setting & design → headline finding with mechanism → portable contribution → brief roadmap.** By the

end of the introduction a geographer in another area should know the question, the argument, the

evidence, and why it matters to geography broadly.

• Lead with the geographic question and argument, not the method or the study area description.
• State the contribution early and as a portable geographic claim (aaag-theory-building).
• Name the place/scale as part of the argument, not as throat-clearing description.

Cross-area legibility

• Translate sub-field jargon: a Physical-Geography reader should follow a Human-Geography paper's stakes and vice versa.
• Keep methods proportionate — enough to judge rigor, not a tutorial that crowds out the argument.
• Use signposting sparingly; let the argument, not a seven-section roadmap, carry the reader.

Trimming to the inclusive cap

• Count abstract, notes, tables, and captions; cut the longest table and the most redundant figure first.
• Move secondary detail to supplementary material rather than padding the body.
• Replace literature dumps with positioned claims (aaag-literature-positioning).

Calibration anchors

• A geographer in another area is your reader. If a physical geographer cannot follow a human-

geography paper's stakes (or vice versa), the framing is too inside-baseball.

• The cap counts almost everything. Abstract, notes, tables, and figure captions are inside the

11,000 words — a "10,000-word body" can still be over.

• Place is argument, not scenery. Naming the study area is not the same as showing why this place,

scale, or region is constitutive of the claim.

Checklist

• [ ] Chicago author-date throughout; reference list consistent
• [ ] Abstract + 3-5 italicized, alphabetized keywords
• [ ] Whole document (incl. notes/tables/captions/refs) within the cap for the article type
• [ ] Introduction states question, geographic stake, finding, and portable contribution early
• [ ] Jargon defined for a general-geography reader; methods proportionate

Anti-patterns

• Leading with the study-area description or the estimator instead of the question and argument
• Treating the cap as body-only and overrunning once captions/notes/refs are counted
• Mixed or non-Chicago citation style; missing or non-italicized keywords
• Sub-field jargon left undefined so other-area geographers cannot follow
• Over-signposted roadmap doing the work the argument should do

Output format

【Citation style】Chicago author-date consistent? [Y/N]
【Abstract + keywords】3-5 italicized, alphabetized? [Y/N]
【Word count】total incl. notes/tables/captions/refs vs. cap
【Intro arc】question → stake → finding → portable contribution early? [Y/N]
【Cross-area legibility】jargon defined; reads as geography? [Y/N]
【Next】aaag-transparency-and-data

Supplementary resources

• [../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md](../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md) — before→after Annals-style introduction
• [../../resources/official-source-map.md](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — Style Sheet, keyword, and word-cap facts