跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

revise

R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,2 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Revise

Structure point-by-point referee responses with classification, agent routing per revision protocol, and diplomatic drafting.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to referee report file(s), optionally followed by paper path.


Workflow

Step 1: Parse Inputs

  1. Read referee report(s) from $ARGUMENTS
  2. Read the paper (paper/main.tex or specified path)
  3. Read revision protocol from rules
  4. Read existing scripts to know what analyses already exist

Step 2: Classify Every Comment

| Class | Routing | Action |

|-------|---------|--------|

| NEW ANALYSIS | → Coder agent | Flag for user, create analysis task |

| CLARIFICATION | → Writer agent | Draft rewritten section |

| REWRITE | → Writer agent | Draft structural revision |

| DISAGREE | → User (mandatory) | Draft diplomatic pushback, flag for review |

| MINOR | → Writer agent | Draft fix directly |

Step 3: Build Tracking Document

Save to quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md with:

  • Summary counts per referee
  • Action items by priority (HIGH: new analysis, MEDIUM: clarification, FLAGGED: disagreements, LOW: minor)

Step 4: Dispatch Agents

  • CLARIFICATION/REWRITE → dispatch Writer with specific instructions
  • NEW ANALYSIS → flag for user approval before dispatching Coder
  • DISAGREE → draft diplomatic response, flag prominently for user

Step 5: Draft Response Letter

Generate LaTeX response letter with:

  • Summary of major changes
  • Point-by-point responses with exact referee quotes
  • Color-coded responses
  • Page/section references for each change

Step 6: Diplomatic Disagreement Protocol

When DISAGREE: open with acknowledgment, provide evidence, offer partial concession, NEVER say "the referee is wrong." FLAG for user review.

Step 7: Save Outputs

  1. Tracker: quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md
  2. Response letter: quality_reports/referee_response_[journal]_[date].tex
  3. Revised sections: paper/sections/ (for CLARIFICATION/REWRITE items)

Principles

  • The response letter is the user's voice. Match their tone.
  • Never fabricate results. Mark NEW ANALYSIS items as TBD.
  • Flag all DISAGREE items. These need human judgment.
  • Track everything. Every comment appears in both tracker and response letter.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。