results-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "gen…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Results Analysis
Run strict, evidence-first experimental analysis for ML/AI research.
Use this skill to produce a strict analysis bundle:
analysis-report.mdstats-appendix.mdfigure-catalog.mdfigures/
Do not use this skill to draft a paper Results section or a full experiment wrap-up report. Those belong to ml-paper-writing or results-report.
Core contract
This skill is responsible for
- validating experiment artifacts and comparison units,
- running rigorous descriptive and inferential statistics,
- generating real scientific figures when data/logs are available,
- writing figure purposes, caption requirements, and interpretation checklists,
- surfacing limits, blockers, and missing evidence explicitly.
This skill is not responsible for
- paper-ready
Resultsprose, - manuscript narrative polishing,
- project-level experiment retrospectives.
If the user wants the complete post-experiment summary report, hand off to results-report after this bundle is ready.
Non-negotiable quality bar
- Prefer real figures over figure specs.
If the data can be read, generate real figures. Do not stop at “recommended visualization”.
- Never fabricate statistics.
If sample size, seeds, or raw metrics are missing, state the blocker clearly.
- Report complete statistics.
Do not report only best scores or only p-values.
- Interpret every main figure.
Every major figure must have purpose, caption requirements, and post-figure interpretation notes.
- Separate evidence from prose.
This skill produces analysis artifacts; it does not write manuscript sections.
Standard workflow
1. Inventory and validate artifacts
Start by identifying:
- metric tables (
csv,json,tsv, logs), - training curves and checkpoints,
- seeds / repeated runs,
- baselines, ablations, and comparison families,
- evaluation protocol metadata.
Validate:
- metric direction (higher/lower is better),
- unit of analysis (run, subject, fold, dataset, seed),
- number of runs / seeds,
- missing values or silent failures,
- comparability across methods.
If the comparison is not statistically valid, say so before continuing.
2. Lock the comparison questions
Before running statistics, define the exact comparison questions:
- Which method is compared to which baseline?
- What is the primary metric?
- What is the repeated-measure unit?
- Which ablation or robustness questions matter?
- Which findings are decision-changing?
Do not mix unrelated comparisons into one undifferentiated table.
3. Run strict statistics
Always produce:
- descriptive statistics:
mean ± stdwhen appropriate, 95% CIor another clearly justified interval,- run/seed counts,
- significance tests with assumptions stated,
- effect sizes,
- multiple-comparison handling when several contrasts are reported.
Default expectation:
- check parametric assumptions first,
- use non-parametric fallback when assumptions fail,
- state exactly what was tested and on what samples.
See:
references/statistical-methods.mdreferences/statistical-reporting.md
4. Generate real scientific figures
Produce actual figures whenever artifacts are available.
Minimum expectation for a non-trivial analysis bundle:
- one main comparison figure,
- one supporting figure (training dynamics / ablation / breakdown / error analysis),
- one exact numeric summary table in markdown.
Every main figure must define:
- figure purpose,
- plotted variables,
- error bar meaning,
- caption requirements,
- interpretation checklist.
See:
references/visualization-best-practices.mdreferences/figure-interpretation.md
5. Write analysis artifacts
analysis-report.md
Summarize:
- the analysis question,
- key findings,
- strongest supported comparisons,
- main caveats,
- what changed in the experimental understanding.
stats-appendix.md
Record:
- descriptive statistics,
- test choices,
- assumptions checked,
- effect sizes,
- confidence intervals,
- multiple comparison corrections,
- explicit blockers and limitations.
figure-catalog.md
For each figure, record:
- filename,
- purpose,
- data source,
- caption draft requirements,
- key observation,
- interpretation checklist,
- known caveats.
6. Final QA gate
Do not finish until all are true:
- [ ] the primary comparison question is explicit,
- [ ] sample size / seed count is stated,
- [ ] inferential tests are justified,
- [ ] effect sizes are reported for major contrasts,
- [ ] real figures exist when data exists,
- [ ] each figure has an interpretation note,
- [ ] limitations and blockers are explicit,
- [ ] no manuscript-style
Resultsdraft is included.
Output structure
analysis-output/
├── analysis-report.md
├── stats-appendix.md
├── figure-catalog.md
└── figures/
├── figure-01-main-comparison.pdf
├── figure-02-ablation.pdf
└── ...
Figure interpretation rule
For every major figure, answer all three questions:
- Why does this figure exist?
- What exactly should the reader notice?
- What does that observation change in our belief or next decision?
If a figure cannot answer question 3, it is probably decorative rather than scientific.
Failure mode policy
When inputs are incomplete, say so explicitly.
Examples:
- no seed-level data -> descriptive summary only; inferential claims blocked,
- no comparable baseline outputs -> no significance claim,
- no readable logs -> cannot generate dynamics figure,
- too few runs -> effect size may be unstable; report this limitation.
Never replace missing evidence with confident prose.
Reference files
Load only what is needed:
references/statistical-methods.md- test selection and assumptionsreferences/statistical-reporting.md- minimum reporting standardreferences/visualization-best-practices.md- publication-quality figure rulesreferences/figure-interpretation.md- how to explain figures with evidencereferences/analysis-depth.md- move from observation to mechanism and decisionreferences/common-pitfalls.md- common analysis and reporting failures
Example files
examples/example-analysis-report.mdexamples/example-stats-appendix.mdexamples/example-figure-catalog.md
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
skills/33-Galaxy-Dawn-claude-scholar/skills/results-analysis/SKILL.md同一个仓库里的其他技能
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill-R
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill-Stata
- auto-empirical-research-skills
- StatsPAI_skill
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill-Stata
- Full-empirical-analysis-skill-R
- academic-paper-composer
- academic-paper-strategist
- medical-imaging-review
- paper-slide-deck