obsidian-literature-workflow

Obsidian Literature Workflow

Handle the literature sub-workflow inside the filesystem-first Obsidian project knowledge base.

Role in the workflow

This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.

Use it when the user says things like:

• “My papers are in Obsidian”
• “Read papers from Zotero and create notes in the vault”
• “Review the notes under Papers/”
• “Generate literature knowledge notes from this project vault”
• “Connect paper notes to project knowledge”
• “Show me the literature structure as a map/graph”
• “Check whether all papers already have detailed notes”

Assumptions

• The project is already bound through .claude/project-memory/registry.yaml, or can be imported with obsidian-project-bootstrap
• Durable paper notes live under Papers/ inside Research/{project-slug}/
• Obsidian note writing is done through the filesystem; no Obsidian MCP is required
• Zotero may still be used as the source of metadata/full text; use $zotero-obsidian-bridge when the source corpus is in Zotero

Default workflow

1. Read bound project memory and locate the vault root.
2. If the source papers are in Zotero, explicitly use $zotero-obsidian-bridge to pull them into canonical Papers/*.md notes.
3. Scan Papers/ and adjacent synthesis notes using filesystem tools.
4. Normalize note metadata and structure using $obsidian-markdown.

• Prefer the standardized review schema:
• Claim
• Method
• Evidence
• Limitation
• Direct relevance to repo
• Relation to other papers

1. Query narrowly first:

• read the relevant paper notes,
• then the linked Knowledge/ notes,
• and only then open Writing/ if the user asked for a review or comparison deliverable.

1. Prefer updating existing paper notes and literature synthesis notes over creating sibling notes.
2. Default literature synthesis should land in Knowledge/, not Experiments/ or Results/:

• update Knowledge/Literature-Overview.md
• update Knowledge/Method-Families.md
• update Knowledge/Research-Gaps.md

when the synthesis is stable enough to deserve canonical notes.

1. If the source is a named collection and the user cares about completeness, maintain a collection inventory note with explicit coverage mapping.
2. Refresh Maps/literature.canvas after major paper-note changes or batch note creation.

• Prefer argument-map structure over dense all-to-all links.
• Prefer semantic filtering and edge thinning.
• Create Maps/literature-main.canvas only when a lightweight presentation graph is needed.

1. Update the daily note and project memory with what changed.

Default outputs

• Papers/ remains first-class: one durable paper note per paper whenever possible
• Knowledge/ holds durable literature synthesis notes
• Maps/literature.canvas is the default visual graph surface
• literature work should usually produce at least one of:
• new or updated paper notes,
• new or updated knowledge notes,
• literature-canvas refresh,
• optional writing synthesis when requested

Default stance

Do not assume by default:

• Concepts/
• Datasets/
• .base views

The literature workflow may create Maps/literature.canvas by default. Other artifacts still require explicit justification.

References

Load only what is needed:

• references/PAPER-NOTE-SCHEMA.md - detailed paper-note frontmatter and sections
• references/CANVAS-WORKFLOW.md - how and when to refresh Maps/literature.canvas