跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

dependency-verification

Verifies a package exists before install, defending against hallucination and slopsquatting. Use when adding, recommending, or installing a package.

执行命令联网无严重或高危命中athola/claude-night-market

它会碰到什么

扫了多少2 个文本文件,7 KB
它会碰到什么执行命令联网
命中总数2 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

> A package name the model produced is a claim, not a fact. The

> registry is the fact. Verify before you install.

Dependency Verification

Overview

Code-generating language models recommend packages that do not

exist at a measured rate of 5.2% (commercial models) to 21.7%

(open models) across 576,000 samples (Spracklen et al. 2024,

arXiv 2406.10279). Worse, 58% of hallucinated names recur across

reruns, so an attacker can predict them, register the empty name,

and ship malware. This is "slopsquatting." A proof-of-concept

package (huggingface-cli) drew over 30,000 downloads after being

registered against a commonly hallucinated name. Package

hallucination is also inversely correlated with coding-benchmark

score, so a better model does not make this go away.

The defense is cheap: confirm the name exists in its registry

before installing or recommending it. This skill defines that

check and is enforced by the guard_package_hallucination.py

PreToolUse hook.

When To Use

Apply before any of these:

  • Running pip install, uv add, npm install, pnpm add,

yarn add, cargo add, poetry add, or pdm add.

  • Writing a dependency into pyproject.toml, requirements.txt,

package.json, or Cargo.toml.

  • Recommending a package to the user in prose.

When NOT To Use

  • Bumping versions of packages already known to exist (use

sanctum:version-updates)

  • Auditing a dependency's supply chain (use

leyline:supply-chain-advisory)

The Two Signals

A package fails verification on either signal:

  1. Nonexistent: the name is absent from its registry. This is

a likely hallucination. Do not install it. Search for the

correct name or confirm the package was renamed or removed.

  1. Typosquat / slopsquat: the name is one or two edits from a

popular package (for example reqeusts versus requests).

This is either a typo or a deliberate impersonation. Confirm

the exact name you intend before proceeding.

A name that is unknown to the bundled popular-package set but

present in the registry passes. A name that cannot be checked

because the registry is unreachable is reported as unverified,

never blocked: the guard does not fail closed on a network error.

A Confidence Signal, Not a Gate

Registry existence is the pass/fail check. Real-world usage is a

separate, softer signal that builds confidence on top of it. Once a

package clears the two signals above, cross-checking that it is

actually used by other projects raises your confidence that the name

is the established one rather than a freshly-registered impostor that

happens to exist.

Useful confidence signals, none of them blocking:

  • GitHub dependents or code search hits for the exact package name

(an established package is imported across many repositories).

  • Repository stars, recent commit activity, and release cadence on

the package's source.

  • Download counts and publish history on the registry (a popular

name registered yesterday is a red flag; a modest name with years

of releases is reassuring).

Treat low usage as a prompt to look closer, never as a reason to

reject on its own. New, niche, internal, and private packages are

legitimately low-usage, so a missing GitHub footprint must not block

an install the registry already confirmed. Use this signal to build

confidence and to disambiguate between two similarly-named packages,

not to gate.

Verification Procedure

  1. Extract the exact package names the command or manifest edit

would fetch (strip version specifiers and flags).

  1. For each name, confirm existence in the registry. See

[registry-checks.md](modules/registry-checks.md) for the

per-ecosystem endpoints and the offline-degradation rule.

  1. For any name close to a popular package, restate the intended

name and confirm it is the one you meant.

  1. Capture the verification as evidence (the registry URL and the

HTTP status) when the install lands in a PR, per

imbue:proof-of-work.

Relationship to the Guard Hook

The guard_package_hallucination.py hook runs this check

automatically on every Bash install command. Shadow mode (warn

only) is the default; set VOW_SHADOW_MODE=0 to block

typosquat and nonexistent installs. Disable the network lookup

with IMBUE_PKG_REGISTRY_CHECK=0 to rely on the offline

typosquat signal alone. The hook is a backstop, not a substitute:

verify deliberately when you add a dependency rather than waiting

for the gate.

Related Skills

  • imbue:proof-of-work: capture the registry check as evidence.
  • leyline:supply-chain-advisory: broader dependency supply-chain

auditing (lockfile drift, artifact integrity, bad versions).

Exit Criteria

  • [ ] Every package in the install command or manifest edit is

confirmed present in its registry, or the install is

abandoned.

  • [ ] Any name within two edits of a popular package is restated

and confirmed before install.

  • [ ] A name that could not be verified online is reported as

unverified and not silently installed.

  • [ ] For PR-bound installs, the registry check is captured as

proof-of-work evidence.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。