跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

scenario-war-room

Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity ac…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中alirezarezvani/claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少3 个文本文件,33 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Scenario War Room

Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.

Keywords

scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem

Quick Start

python scripts/scenario_modeler.py   # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling

Or describe the scenario in natural language:

> "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?"

> "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?"

> "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?"

What This Is Not

  • Not a single-assumption stress test (that's /em:stress-test)
  • Not financial modeling only — every function gets modeled
  • Not worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels
  • Not paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers

Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model

Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)

State each variable with:

  • What changes — specific, quantified if possible
  • Probability — your best estimate
  • Timeline — when it hits
Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice
  Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days

Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close
  Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3

Variable C: Lead engineer resigns
  Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown

Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping

For each variable, each relevant role models impact:

| Domain | Owner | Models |

|--------|-------|--------|

| Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options |

| Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline |

| Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk |

| Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk |

| People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications |

| Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk |

| Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk |

| Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure |

Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping

This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:

TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)
  ↓
CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months
  ↓
CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)
  ↓
CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips
  ↓
CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk
  ↓
CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk
  ↓
CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]

Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.

Step 4: Severity Matrix

Model three scenarios:

| Scenario | Definition | Recovery |

|----------|------------|---------|

| Base | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan |

| Stress | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response |

| Severe | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention |

For each severity level:

  • Runway impact
  • ARR impact
  • Headcount impact
  • Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)

Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)

Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding before it's confirmed:

Trigger for Customer Churn Risk:
  - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks
  - Usage drops >25% MoM
  - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1

Trigger for Fundraise Delay:
  - <3 term sheets after 60 days of process
  - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD
  - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)

Trigger for Engineering Attrition:
  - Glassdoor activity from engineering team
  - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers
  - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months

Step 6: Hedging Strategies

For each scenario: actions to take now (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.

| Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline |

|-------|------|--------|-------|---------|

| Establish $500K credit line | $5K/year | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days |

| 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days |

| Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters |

| Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate |


Output Format

Every war room session produces:

SCENARIO: [Name]
Variables: [A, B, C]
Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]

SEVERITY LEVELS
Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no]

CASCADE MAP
[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]

EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]

HEDGES (take these actions now)
1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]

RECOMMENDED DECISION
[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]

Rules for Good War Room Sessions

Max 3 variables per scenario. More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.

Quantify or estimate. "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain.

Don't stop at first-order effects. The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.

Model recovery, not just impact. Every scenario should have a "what we do" path.

Separate base case from sensitivity. Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen."

Don't over-model. 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.


Common Scenarios by Stage

Seed:

  • Co-founder leaves + product misses launch
  • Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable

Series A:

  • Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed
  • Key customer churns + competitor raises

Series B:

  • Market contraction + burn multiple spikes
  • Lead investor wants pivot + team resists

Integration with C-Suite Roles

| Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To |

|--------------|---------------|------------|

| Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) |

| Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) |

| Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) |

| Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) |

| Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) |

| Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) |

References

  • references/scenario-planning.md — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks
  • scripts/scenario_modeler.py — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

它属于哪个仓库

星标★ 26,030
本站分层T1
该仓技能数846
原文件路径c-level-advisor/skills/scenario-war-room/SKILL.md

同一个仓库里的其他技能

看这个仓库的全部 846 个技能

同名技能的其他版本

有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 scenario-war-room 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: